Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

i have an os giken twin plate, probably TS2CD. what i want to know is:

can it be modified so it's more like a stock clutch (i.e. by replacing the centre or something)?

if not, i guess i should replace it (say with a jim berry - unless he could modify it?). what would you advise?

relevant info:

1994 r32 gtr

power fc (not yet installed)

HKS turbo Actuators

HKS air pods

5Zigen turbo-back exhaust

550cc injectors

cheers all.

sig.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144542-making-my-clutch-easier-to-use/
Share on other sites

yeah i should have specified my problems a bit better :rofl:

the main things are that (a) it bites hard and (b) it grips in about a centimetre. this makes hill starts and moving off at low revs a real problem. i stall it a lot. i also spin the wheels a lot.

would a new slave fix these? or something else?

If it takes up close to the floor don't use a larger diameter slave cylinder because that will make it worse.

A bigger slave will make the take up a little more gradual, the low or high take up point can be ajusted .

A Nismo slave is a little bigger and will help a little , it won't feel as sudden ( the take up).

A Nismo slave is a little bigger and will help a little , it won't feel as sudden ( the take up).

Hmmm....how much is a little?

Im pretty sure there is an adjustment on the rod that goes from the pedal to the slave.

i thought the adjustment on the shaft only moved the take up position, but not the suddenness or distance of the takeup....?

Yeah the adjustment does only move the take up position,which you said is too close,so thats how you can adjust that.As for the suddenness of the take off,putting a bigger slave in will help a fair bit but you will pretty much just have to get used to it.Thats all just part of having a twin plate.

Hmmm....how much is a little
?

Standard slave is 3/4" and Nismo is 13/16" diameter( about 8.5% bigger) . When you use the Nismo slave the pedal will feel a little easier to push as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...