Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I have just started to install my avc-r boost controller and have found the vehicle specific wiring diagram obtained from the official apexi site does not match that of my ECU. My car is a 1995 series1 gts25t.

Below is the picture of the plug and where I was going to splice the wires at. (Note no rpm signal pin where it supposed to be)

pinout1.jpg

Does anyone know what deal with this is or where the actual rpm pin is?

Also, have I got it upside down or the wrong diagram???

And here is the pin out diagram provided by apexi.

clip_image002.jpg

Any help much appreciated, as I'm baffled.

Edited by BAMR33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144789-avc-r-wiring-problems/
Share on other sites

i just installed mine 2 days ago, that is the correct diagram and mine works . i highly suggest u got the the injection signal rather than the rpm since the avcr cant "self learn" the boost setting to the specific injection duty. (if u are setting it urself and not getting it tuned)

if u are getting it tuned let the tuner set it to ur revs, my mate told me he knows a guy who blew his engine because of that.

im gunna write up a DIY since no one here has done it for the avc-r. so it will be up soon

heres a diagram that would really help. u can double check if ur wiring is backwards by checking the blanks.

the diagram shows the male(pins) on the ecu. so make sure u dont get them mixed up.

like i say follow this diagram, the blanks will clearly show u which wires the the right ones. gluck dude and make sure the wires are in good contact.

post-17292-1164475438.jpg

no probs i was shitty myself too when i did it LOL.

but when i followed the connectors according to blanks i relise they are the male connectors.

have fun. ps u going for injector signal or rpm. i got stock turbo too so let me know how much duty cycle u running.

this is the way i set up mine.

OFF-stock boost (this way u actually have 2 boost settings)

A- .65 with 35% duty cycle (street)

B- .80 with 45% DC (dont want to hurt my baby).....this is enough fun for now.

It's now wired in, sh1t's rock'n an roll'n. I just went with the rpm signal as I'll have the pfc to monitor injector duty.

For now I'll be running a big 10% DC just to stablize the boost curve ie. not solely relying on wastegate (probably bump it up to 9psi) Untill I get the rest of mods on and a proper tune i'm not gunna bother running anymore boost.

ahhah pussy! ;)

i ran .85 as soon as i test drove it LOL, this is with my stock cooler.LOL

just finished putting on dump/front, catch can, r34 cooler,water spray for cooler and redo my boost gauge to pro standards. just need an exhaust place to weld up my hi flow and ill feel safe running .8bar (12psi)

just a quick question me that me and a mate had diff on. the smaller the duty cycle the faster it boost? or the higher it is the more it boost?

Edited by philta
ahhah pussy! :D

i ran .85 as soon as i test drove it LOL, this is with my stock cooler.LOL

just finished putting on dump/front, catch can, r34 cooler,water spray for cooler and redo my boost gauge to pro standards. just need an exhaust place to weld up my hi flow and ill feel safe running .8bar (12psi)

just a quick question me that me and a mate had diff on. the smaller the duty cycle the faster it boost? or the higher it is the more it boost?

Bahaha...

I couldn't resist either, nice cool night minimal traffic. Boosted it up to .8bar no troubles. Looks friggin cool at night.

Na, the duty cycle is purely to do with boost control by controlling the duration the solenoid is open and bleeding off air. It has no effect on the rate of spooling, the higher the DC the more air is getting bleed off ie. tricking the wastegate actuator into running more boost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...