Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like lowered cars but for me, that is a bit too low

Agreed.

Love to look - not to own.

you guys serious?

i dont know why more than 70% of 34 gtr owners are against lowering, and if "twisties" are your excuse pfft

R34 GTR's can run pretty aggressive. I know a person running 19x11 +6 F and +3 R, 275/30/19 all round but no scrubbing.

The car is low too!

Could be possible.

Would have to be rolled at the very least and a bit of camber.

Pics?

I'm running 19x10.5 +12 GT-Vs now for a change and have 15mm spacers on.

So thats an offset of about -3mm. I could theoretically run another half inch on the inside with this offset.

I want some 18x11 +5 or -5 and dial in :)

My cars not really what you call proper though. Slightly wider than real R34s.

what sort of width and offset would I need to run to fill the guards like on that blue 34 GTR ^^ up there, on my 34 GTT?

Sinno might be able to help you and other R34 GTT owners.

Sinno was running crazy offsets for a GTT if i recall correctly.

you guys serious?

i dont know why more than 70% of 34 gtr owners are against lowering, and if "twisties" are your excuse pfft

I hope I didn't offend u. You have a great car and BB is my favourite colour for the 34 (inline with a white n1 :) aka Terry's car)

Not everyone liked my r34 wheels on my r32 so u can't make everyone happy.

I have this thing with the wrx, evo or gtr cannot sit too low...can I explain it? No hahaha

nah all good fellas

just if you compare 2 gtr's identical side by side, 1 slapped, 1 jacked up . then youll see how phat it looks

something about guard over tread makes the biggest difference to side profile

when i first lowered my car my mechanic couldnt fit the straps under the car and had to raise it 20mm

i asked if thats ever happened before, he said no

I AM BOSS haha :D

Sinno might be able to help you and other R34 GTT owners.

Sinno was running crazy offsets for a GTT if i recall correctly.

Wouldn't say crazy offset, but good enough stance to still make it practical.

I'm running R: 18x10+22 245/40 and F: 18x9+15 235/40.

Note: Its not chrome lol. just very clean!

qjHQp.jpg

I'm pretty sure Shinobi_s14 is running tougher offset?

Wouldn't say crazy offset, but good enough stance to still make it practical.

I'm running R: 18x10+22 245/40 and F: 18x9+15 235/40.

Note: Its not chrome lol. just very clean!

qjHQp.jpg

I'm pretty sure Shinobi_s14 is running tougher offset?

Any scraping issues with this setup or did you just roll/lip the guards?

Yeah SiNNO I've got 18x9.5 +20 on the fronts 225/40 and 18x10 +15 rears, 235/40, just had to roll the guards, thinking about flaring them a tad in the future though but it tucks in real nicely when it's lowered with bit of tyre tuck but had to raise it a tad due to the monster driveway at my place haha

562948_10150793673381257_330741548_n.jpg

Edited by shinobi_s14

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...