Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I actually defeated a "failure to obey an officer" or whatever.

because he wasnt in uniform :laugh:

He didnt have

1) A hat

2) reflective vest while directing traffic

3) Shoulder lapels.

I went on the argument he looked like a hot and bothered bus driver.

And winner to me :(

The judge actually hammered him. He had been in the force for 20 years and should have known better.

Power to the people :laugh:

Thats not the issue here. You got off because the officer failed to correctly identify himself, not because he wasnt in uniform. They are not the same thing, how else do you think plain clothes officers and detectives are able to execute their duties?

Original poster...Good luck with it all :)

Note to self: underwear on head is bad ;)

Thats not the issue here. You got off because the officer failed to correctly identify himself, not because he wasnt in uniform. They are not the same thing, how else do you think plain clothes officers and detectives are able to execute their duties?

Original poster...Good luck with it all ;)

Note to self: underwear on head is bad :laugh:

If they are performing traffic duties, they must be in the correct attire to do so

back to the Question.

Unfortunately there are too many variables to answer this question with any certainty.

Variable 1 - Vic Police can inspect a vehicle and if in the officers opinion he/she thinks it is unroadworthy can issue a defect notice. Most officers would not know what was legal or not, so they tend to defect a car to make sure it is checked and legal

Variable 2 - Officers length of service. A serving member of the Victoria Police who has recently graduated and in in his/her probation period prior to confirmation ( ie first 12 months out of the academy before becoming a real cop) is required to have a certain amount of stat's to show they have been an active member of the force. Stats are logged by shift, by post and these can include traffic offences or briefs ( where they send someone to court for a more serious offence). Get someone out of the academy with a point to prove and you could be fined.

Variable 3 - The Victoria police standard practice of " the attitude test". Basically a cop will pull you over for something random to see how your attitude is, fail the attitude test and bang, there is your defect and possible fines depending on how badly you fail the attitude test.

These are 3 main things that a senior contact in TMU told me just before I posted this.

However, you do have some rights and responsibilities.

In short it is your responsibility to make sure your car is in a roadworthy condition when driving on public roads, that you obey road laws and drive in a safe manor.

You do have the right has a motorist to ask for the police officers name, badge number, station and supervisor. You also have the right to take the matter to court to appeal your fine/ defect etc and to seek some compensation if it can be prooved that your vehicle was roadworthy at the time of being defected.

You also have the right to complain if you feel you are being constantly harrassed by police and this can be done to the office of police integrity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...