Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey man, yeah i htought maybe rich and retard? but even on stock boost :S

I have a SAFC NEO comming but now think i should have spent the extra on a PFC>

I have a mate who offered to let me try his PFC to see if that sorts anyhting out, ill let u know how i go in a day or two after we have tried it.

The hesitation in mine is really sever, overtaking commodores is impposibble and imbarassing.

Mine is very noticable.But opens up again after 5000RPM.Due to a defect i have a standard zorst on.But get my other one back tomorrow.Ill let you know if this does anything also.But yeh very interested in the ECU swap.Keep me posted.

CHEERS

perhaps someone could donate a pfc from a car with similar mods and a richish tune, see what happens. i wouldnt try it for too long though with the wrong ecu thats just asking for trouble. it need only be a 5 minute swap. If it works its your ecu, if not, its a sensor or boost problem.

really does sound like management, but management does some funny things with the wrong sensor readings so it may not be the ecu.

thats all i got guys sorry. Maybe MANWHORE can help nytsky out your both in syd

After i got my exhaust back today(fujitsubo 3inch) it felt alot better.But can still feel a little bit of hesitation between 3 and 5k.Alot smoother but still there.

Im in the process of getting an FC(i bloody hope) so ill get it on the dyno and find out for sure.

hi guys got it fixed yesterday

on the dyno made 128 rwhp

fixed-

replaced fuel pressure regulator

replaced airflow sensor ( the 3 i tried previously where dodgy)

for some reason timming is quiet advanced because hte car didnt want to do any hting on the standard base timing? dont know why?

After tune made 270.9 rwhp or 202 rwkw ! very happy!

The air fuel ratio is still very rich according to the tuner, Tuner says when my SAFC neo comes should be good for over 300 rwhp.

Total mods are-

-walbro fuel pump

-metal intake pipe.

-pod filter

-boost 10psi

-dump back exuast

-Delta fin fmic

-stock turbo and stock ecu

-oil catch can

Pretty happy with tune so far

Edited by tmc_2
hi guys got it fixed yesterday

on the dyno made 128 rwhp

fixed-

replaced fuel pressure regulator

replaced airflow sensor ( the 3 i tried previously where dodgy)

for some reason timming is quiet advanced because hte car didnt want to do any hting on the standard base timing? dont know why?

After tune made 270.9 rwhp or 202 rwkw ! very happy!

The air fuel ratio is still very rich according to the tuner, Tuner says when my SAFC neo comes should be good for over 300 rwhp.

Total mods are-

-walbro fuel pump

-metal intake pipe.

-pod filter

-boost 10psi

-dump back exuast

-Delta fin fmic

-stock turbo and stock ecu

-oil catch can

Pretty happy with tune so far

Holy crap thats a huge increase.Where did you get it done?And how much?

How did he tune it exactly if you done have a SAFC or power FC to tune it with?

well she definatly is not a stock turbo, especialy on an R33. I have just managed to squize 200rwkw out of mine at 10psi with all the mods and SAFC II. that is at 10psi, i guess top would be about 210rwks if all goes well at 12 psi. what boost are you running.

You sure those figures are at the wheels. not at the crank?

well she definatly is not a stock turbo, especialy on an R33. I have just managed to squize 200rwkw out of mine at 10psi with all the mods and SAFC II. that is at 10psi, i guess top would be about 210rwks if all goes well at 12 psi. what boost are you running.

You sure those figures are at the wheels. not at the crank?

He got such a increase beacue the car was running so fcked and had to fix the stuffed things.

For some reason timming is in an advanced position bacuse the car wouldnt do much wiht stock base timing, the air fuel ratio is still way rich. the power figures where at the wheels and as far as i can see its a stock turbo. Unless its had some sort of highflow job done to it??

I hear of other people wiht good nick r33 with similar mods cracking the 200rwkw mark???

Im running 10psi boost

Holy crap thats a huge increase.Where did you get it done?And how much?

How did he tune it exactly if you done have a SAFC or power FC to tune it with?

Got it done at FIST performance at wacol. Onyl work shop open after new years who would take my car with such late notice- i was not expecting the excellent service they gave me.

He basically just fixed my problems, u cant tune much with a stock ecu except base timming and make sure its all running ok.

Edited by tmc_2

i dont thin you have a high flow, if you had a highflow running 10psi your stock ecu would shit itself and you would be back to 128 or worse. 200kw is about right, its not really a number that means anything after all, actual figure could be + or - 50 but who cares, whatever that figure really is, you just doubled it. the increase is the only figure you can take from a dyno other than air/fuel ratio.

congratulations on finding the problems and having a car in top shape

i hope mine does that one day

i got 204kw with my stock turbo and ecu on 11psi. any higher and it hit R&R. my mate has 1 with 175kw and mine feels heaps better. before mine had the cooler put on and only had a cat back exhaust and was running 9psi it was a dead match for another mates car that had full exhaust, cooler and 11psi. i know that my turbo is stock, but i just think that my engine is healthy, and we had made a few "modifications" to get more power out of it.

now i have a remapped ecu and am running 13-14psi (still on stock turbo). while trying to sort out an idle missfire issue i put the old ecu back in and went back to 11psi. it felt like a grandma car. it was so boring. so i stuck the remaped ecu back in and wound the boost back up and it went back to being a fun car. i'm going to be getting a safc some time just to trim up the AFRs to get even more power. the remapped ecu is leaner than the stock ecu, but is still down around 11.4 at WOT at high rpm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...