Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

aquariuz6, I remaped my ECU when I had the GT25 in my car, but now I replaced it with a bigger turbo and FMIC etc., so all the set up is different again. Therefore, I'm not sure if I can still use the old remaped ECU to run it, that's why I have a few questions want to ask:

Q1.Is the remaped ECU will do the same job as the SAFC?

Q2.The car doesn't give enough fuel to support my new turbo, can the remap fix my fuel mixture problem?

Q3.If the turbo is rate 480hp, does that mean I cannot have my car over that limit?

Q4.Does anyone use their standard injectors with remaped ECU/standard ECU and dyno over 250+kW at the rear wheels?

Q5.How many engine HP do I have when I dyno 215 kW at the rear wheels?

*Please help me as much as you can and I look forward to tune my car again soon. :)

aquariuz6, I remaped my ECU when I had the GT25 in my car, but now I replaced it with a bigger turbo and FMIC etc., so all the set up is different again. Therefore, I'm not sure if I can still use the old remaped ECU to run it, that's why I have a few questions want to ask:

Q1.Is the remaped ECU will do the same job as the SAFC?

Q2.The car doesn't give enough fuel to support my new turbo, can the remap fix my fuel mixture problem?

Q3.If the turbo is rate 480hp, does that mean I cannot have my car over that limit?

Q4.Does anyone use their standard injectors with remaped ECU/standard ECU and dyno over 250+kW at the rear wheels?

Q5.How many engine HP do I have when I dyno 215 kW at the rear wheels?

*Please help me as much as you can and I look forward to tune my car again soon. :)

1. Yes but no adjustment with remap

2. yes

3. Sometimes

4. Apparently some do with adjustable fpr but I wouldn't recommend it

5. 215rwkw x 1.34 = 288rwhp add 10% drivetrain loss x 1.1 = 316 horsepower @ the flywheel roughly. Some people say drive train losses are more than 10% - more like 18% - I'm sure someone knows better.

If I were you and had a 480 hp turbo fitted I'd get an apexi pfc. Not really expensive but allows you to do so much more.

Also a lot of remappers don't have real time emulators so can only do changes to your maps with the engine switched off. Unless the tuner's really on the ball the tune most likely won't be as good as one done with aftermarket engine managment.

Cheers

Edited by gtst25
gtst25, so what about the E-manage blue compare with the remap?

Not sure about emanage. You have to look at the price I spose - if there's only a few hundred between adapting a gtr pfc and emanage I know what I'd go for assuming you're running a rb20.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...