Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

K so just for my own knowledge can some one give me the turbo sizes on the following

Stock rb20det turbo (t25?)

Stock rb25det turbo (t28?)

Stock rb25det neo/r34 turbo (would it be like a t28/30 because of the larger rear housing?)

Thanks, i did try searching but all i found was the rb20det size and i already knew that

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150347-turbo-sizes-on-stock-skylines/
Share on other sites

stock rb20 = t3/t25 (smallest)

stock rb25 = t3/t25 (medium)

stock rb25 neo = vg30 size (large)

stock rb30et = t3/t25 (not sure, large i think)

smallest = somewhere near 0.45a/r maybe?

medium = 0/50 a/r ish ?

large = 0.55 a/r ish ?

t28 is found on the sr20 (silvia, gtir, 200sx, 180sx)

none whatsoever i dont think, the t25 i am pretty sure referes the flange option, which is the connecting plate to the manifold.

ie: an rb30et with a t25 flange should plonk on the stock skyline t25 manifold with no problems (dumps, exhaust aside etc)

A/R

A/R describes a geometric characteristic of all compressor and turbine housings. It is defined as the inlet cross-sectional area divided by the radius from the turbo centerline to the centroid of that area.

* Compressor A/R - Compressor performance is largely insensitive to changes in A/R, but generally larger A/R housings are used to optimize the performance for low boost applications, and smaller housings are used for high boost applications. Usually there are not A/R options available for compressor housings.

* Turbine A/R - Turbine performance is greatly affected by changing the A/R of the housing. Turbine A/R is used to adjust the flow capacity of the turbine. Using a smaller A/R will increase the exhaust gas velocity into the turbine wheel, causing the wheel to spin faster at lower engine RPMs giving a quicker boost rise. This will also tend to increase exhaust backpressure and reduce the max power at high RPM. Conversely, using a larger A/R will lower exhaust gas velocity, and delay boost rise, but the lower backpressure will give better high RPM power. When deciding between A/R options, be realistic with the intended vehicle use and use the A/R to bias the performance toward the desired powerband.

The std turbos on 90's era RWD Skylines were a Nissan/Hitachi ceramic turbined ball bearing series . They have a "T3" style mounting flange and from memory the compressor backplate diametre is almost the same as Garrett T3 . I think the water coolant banjo bolt thread is the same size as Garret water cooled T3/small shaft T4 cores .

Basically they used small/med/large sized exhaust housings for 2 , 2.5 , 3L sized engines and their respective exhaust gas flow requirements . The turbines were all the same size . Note some R34 RB25DET's used the larger 3L exhaust housing . The compressor housing as you would expect is smallest on RB20 DET's , the largest was RB25DET and the VG30 just a tad smaller than RB25's . You can easily tell the RB25 and VG30 types because they have "Nissan" cast into them in bold block lettering . The RB20 is a more crude style casting and the aluminium more of a silver than a grey colour . The size of the three bolt comp housing outlet is smaller on the RB20 turbo than 25 or VG 30 type . The VG30 type has a straight barb type adapter fitted here whilst the RB25 ones have a 90 degree elbow fitted to theirs . I can't remember what the RB20 type had .

Some people have found a Garrett type comp housing on one variation of the R34 GTT but have not seen this type myself .

Commode VLT's use a small turbine series version of Garretts watercooled T3 bush bearing turbo with Nissan compressor and turbine housings . These have the same T3 mounting flange .

T28 is different again with smaller shaft and bearings/cartridge , is available in bush or ball bearing though the BB types generally have "GT" series compressor and turbine wheels . T25 was a slightly smaller wheel housing variation of the T28 theme . T2/T25/T28 are of the same family core wise and generally use the T2/25/28 mounting flange though there are some T3 flanged turbine (exhaust) housings out there ie from HKS .

The GT25 BB centre section is virtually the same shaft and bearing wise from GT2554R right throught to GT3582R , this last one is slightly larger on the compressor end of the turbine shaft . These can have T2/25/28 flange or T3 depending on who made the turbine housing to suite which application . ATP even now do a T4 flanged housing for the GT3582R .

Lots of variations , cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
stock rb20 = t3/t25 (smallest)

stock rb25 = t3/t25 (medium)

stock rb25 neo = vg30 size (large)

stock rb30et = t3/t25 (not sure, large i think)

smallest = somewhere near 0.45a/r maybe?

medium = 0/50 a/r ish ?

large = 0.55 a/r ish ?

t28 is found on the sr20 (silvia, gtir, 200sx, 180sx)

Not quite correct there. CA silvias use T25's and SR silvia's use T25g turbos. T28 turbos didnt come in till the S14. Gtir did however get a T28 with a larger rear housing that was the biggest untill the S15 T28 came out.

Cheers

Chris

There is a huge range of Garrett factory T2/25/28 turbos and many of their own hybrids . They were developed because Garrett felt that the ageing T3 had more rotating group innertia than they wanted and the unit was a little bulky for small engine applications . The writing is on the wall when you have .36 A/R exhaust housings to get a turbo going .

They gained a little with the smaller diametre turbine shaft and bush bearings which have less oil shear drag . Innitially they were a bitch of a thing because Garret refused to sell rebuild kits for them and you could only buy cartridges , sound like the BB scenerio ?

Too lazy to look it up but the Pulsar GTiR's T28 was an odd ball specific to that engine/car . Its turbine was 79T from memory and the turbine housing .86A/R . I have a feeling that the compressor is T3 series and its housing a face lifted TO4B . The rally peoply didn't really like them because they were too laggy - amongst many of that cars other insurmountable weight distribution/cooling/body flexing etc problems . It was very likely the beginnings of what became the DP GT2860RS turbocharger .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...