Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

"

The zero demerit plan for the first year of the provisional licence has been put forward by motoring body NRMA, with its president, Alan Evans, saying it would be an effective deterrent against irresponsible behaviour on the roads.

"

Full story here -

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/split-...8104893203.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Another band aid proposal to make the public think the government is doing something proactive to curb the p plate death toll.

As long as it only applies to red p platers like they are saying on the news then I'm ok. Can't wait to get off my P's

Edited by Yo-Yo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2804420
Share on other sites

So all these little kiddies are going to be driving with their head frimly planted in front of their speedo, and not on the road.

Well done.

Exactly lol.

That and busy watching for speed cameras.

Such a lame idea honestly. I can think of more than just P plate drivers who should suffer these consequences :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2804440
Share on other sites

What to kill everyone under 25? Or have they fixed the railway down there now so trains stop crashing?

trains dont crash, they hit stupid people who end up in front of them, and this hasnt happened since.... a few days ago

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2804797
Share on other sites

One offence that p platers are often charged/hassled for is not displaying p plates. This applies when they are not visible enough for the cop that is looking, so even if the plate is obscured enough to annoy one, you can lose a demerit point and your entire license.

That will really keep those dangerous p plate non displayers off the road! I feel really safe now!

That is one of the stupidest things yet!

When will these retards come up with something that may work!!!

From that article:

"P-Plate deaths for 2006 increased by almost 30 per cent to 94 from the previous year, which recorded 73, according to the roads authority."

From those stats, im really confident that this new plan if you can even call it that will work, stupid twits.

In addition to that, i would like say that due to his recent plan Harold Scruby is a foolish and stupid idiot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2804891
Share on other sites

the law will just flood the road withs p platers for many years to come.. so many people will lose it then start over again.. p platers everywhere.. no one able to buy turbo'd cars.. price for them drop dramattally.. might be able to buy two or three skylines in a couple years time :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2804904
Share on other sites

In addition to that, i would like say that due to his recent plan Harold Scruby is a foolish and stupid idiot.

You only just worked that out?

The guy is a complete idiot. I've seen bags of cement less dense than that crank.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2805065
Share on other sites

"P-Plate deaths for 2006 increased by almost 30 per cent to 94 from the previous year, which recorded 73, according to the roads authority."

Banning inexperienced youngsters from driving certain cars based on near-irrelevant criteria is reaping its rewards.

The NSW government has had several goes at reducing the road toll. Double demerits. Minimum driving times when supervised by unqualified drivers who haven't been tested for a while. Banning cars that inevitably have reasonable brakes and chassis setups. etc etc.

If my track record for driving a car was the same as the government's track record for coming up with effective road safety, unlike them I wouldn't be permitted to continue doing so. While we've both killed 30% more people on the roads this year than last year, in my case its only because an extra 30% on top of zero is still zero.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2805075
Share on other sites

this is bs......i dont believe in making it a zero point licience. i rkn it be better to maybe lower it to 2 or 3.

ive been caught out once going over the speed limit by 6ks.....and got 1 point taken off.....just cuz of that im suppose to lose my licience....bs

if ppl are speeding over 10...or even 15....sure a lose of licience may be more fair.

and like someone said...getting a defect for something that just happened is suppse to get my licience taken off...man bs.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/150616-p-plate-laws/#findComment-2805377
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...