Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Lets say you'd otherwise carry 4 people home. Now instead of having 4 guys in 1 car, you've now got 4 guys in 4 cars.

So you're saying that if they're all in one car that the designated driver will "hoon around and carry on", but if they're all following each other down the road and lining up at the lights that they'll be driving Miss Daisy? No chance of showing off?

Riiiiiiight :)

im trying to explain from a "practical" point of view. research shows that you are like a million times more likely to do something stoopid on the road if you are carrying passengers so restricting them to no passengers would cut the rate in half.

Maybe there wood be 4 cars on the road hooning but if one crashed there would be three friends alive and only one dead.

thats not the point though. there will still be one dead, there shood be none... but it wont stop.

Maybe there wood be 4 cars on the road hooning but if one crashed there would be three friends alive and only one dead.

Well, when one car crashes with 4 passengers its not guaranteed that they'll all die.

And whose to say that 2 of these idiots street racing won't lose control and crash into each other. Instead of one car careening into the scenery or into oncoming traffic and possibly killing bystanders, you've now got 2 cars pinballing down the road. Double the debris - double the chance of it causing collateral damage.

We can speculate all day about the pros and cons of each - in the end, the only way to guarantee that this stuff won't happen is to lock these people up in padded rooms. Its not practical, but the only way you can guarantee people (youths or not) don't run amok in the outside world is to not let them into the outside world.

research shows that you are like a million times more likely to do something stoopid on the road if you are carrying passengers

I beg to differ. Well, not differ, but provide a different perspective.

The data shows that people are more likely to do something stupid on the road if they're in groups (i.e. there are witnesses). Determining meaningful information from the data, however, is something else entirely.

I don't think its relevant whether said witnesses are in the same vehicle, or in other vehicles. How many times do you see groups of cars driven in a pack that launch hard at a set of lights, or dice through traffic? Those same people don't do it if they're not in a pack.

And given how many people these days drive with their ears welded to their mobile phones, its not like drivers in other cars can't call them and egg on their mates. Unlike the past, you're never out of vocal range of your mates to tell them to "smoke it at the lights, bro".

From personal experience (and I realise its not empirical) when I see 4 guys piled in to a car what'll usually happen is that the guys in the back seat will be yelling out the window as they drive past. When I see 4 guys in 2 cars, what'll usually happen is that they'll both gun it and weave through traffic trying to get ahead of one another.

QUOTE(NicsR33 @ 16 Jan 2007, 07:16 PM)

research shows that you are like a million times more likely to do something stoopid on the road if you are carrying passengers

I also beg to differ, if i tried anything stupid with my mum in the car she'd smack me over the back of my head..

What solution!? people will always yern to be free, this is just another form of control. people will always do things they want to, unless all freedoms are taken away. then we dont have freedom, so what do all our soldiers then fight for.

Now there`s a point, conscription was unreal in the sixties. I saw 18 year old drop kicks turn into real people after just 6 mths.Maybe after a year in the army hoons would appreciate there existance a little more.If your really that bored you have to destroy a family or cripple your girlfriend then here is a gun, go shoot the enemies of freedom.(no not me). :D

Forgive me if this was raised, but effectively arn't they saying "When you don't know better, you get no chances but once you know the rules and the consequences you can have a few chances"

It makes no sense. P-Platers are learning. Opens still are but have more experience... So they get more chances than the learners do??? That makes no f**king sense at all.

totally, the army will fix everything... :D even if there was all the training and all that crap they say they need, there will forever be people that will want to test themselves and their cars... they wont think for that second but regret that second for life...

read a few of the comments.. here's some of my views..

the 50 hrs that a L driver need to collect in their book be make compulsary to be proper driving schools.. not parents, not friends who have gold or silver licenses.. must be proper driving schools..

the only downside of this suggestion is the cost of getting a license.. it'll increase several fold.. but at the cost of the license being dearer.. you'll get proper lessons n such (provided it's a competent teacher of course)

cheers

You can pay for it too. :sorcerer:

Maybe after a year in the army hoons would appreciate there existance a little more.If your really that bored you have to destroy a family or cripple your girlfriend then here is a gun, go shoot the enemies of freedom.(no not me). :(

Is that why Pvt Kovco got shot...?

nless all freedoms are taken away. then we dont have freedom, so what do all our soldiers then fight for.

What they're fighting for now. The international interests of large corporations that don't feel that ethics have a place in business, aside from marketing guff.

Now there`s a point, conscription was unreal in the sixties. I saw 18 year old drop kicks turn into real people after just 6 mths.Maybe after a year in the army hoons would appreciate there existance a little more.If your really that bored you have to destroy a family or cripple your girlfriend then here is a gun, go shoot the enemies of freedom.(no not me). :(

I no hoons that are in the army so i can tell you first hand that this won't work. They have also been overseas aswell and that didn't change them much at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...