Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

oh my god, stop clogging this useful thread up with crap. i was being facetious.

here's a few facts:

toyota and whipple are two different companies, and their blowers are COMPLETELY different.

currently i have an SC-14 on my RB30. i know what they are, and i know that supercharging has been covered because i did it.

whipple blowers are produced by lysholm AB industries in sweden. this is what is going onto my 25/30 hybrid engine. they are capable of massive power outputs with huge top-end airflow and no lag.

so stop posting useless stuff you obviously have no clue about. "toyota whipple blower" eh? where can i get one?

Stocky, you can't just not feed the vct from an external block source because it also feeds the front cam seal as well.

If you don't hook the vct gallery up the cam and seal will be rooted very quickly.

Also dont forget the front water gallery near the vct oil feed hole on the head surface needs some material added to it for a good seal. When you are getting the head reco, get them to weld the gallery up so it seals good.

And because you need that welded you might as well get the old vct gallery welded as well, rather then using a grub screw/plug.

:(

ah okay i was under the impression that it could be simply welded up and re-faced, obviously not! so i HAVE to feed oil into that gallery somehow then? i might as well use the VCT then, it will be just as easy. i think i can set up an RPM trigger to feed 12V to the solenoid when it needs it, shouldn't be too hard. or i can just leave it unplugged.

so you're 100% sure i have to feed oil up to that gallery? i am sure i have heard of a few people just blocking it off with a grub screw and leaving it, that's all.

The grub screw you've heard about blocks off the hole at the head/cylinder interface as there is no matching oil supply hole in the rb30 block as in the rb25. If you dont block it off your external oil feed will leak through this hole.

I played around with disconnecting the VCT solenoid on my stock cammed RB30DET and found that without it the bottom end was noticeably doughy. It is a relatively minor mod compared to implementing a blower system...

oh my god, stop clogging this useful thread up with crap. i was being facetious.

so stop posting useless stuff you obviously have no clue about.

I used to own a sc14 blower (not on an RB that's wrong) The bearings went in it coz I pushed it past 11psi.

sc14.jpg

Have you had the internals ceramic coated? coz going past 11psi with these things generate so much heat they melt the teflon coated internals.

i know that supercharging has been covered because i did it.

Please read the previous 93 pages, you have not mentioned about this but others have. It's worth reading everypage and saves the frustration of having to explain it all over again.

my target is 350-400 ponies at the wheels (300kw or so) and i simply don't need any more than that. from all my calcs, i am pretty sure i'll only need about 14-15 psi at the most to achieve this (not from a turbo) so i should be right with stock cams etc.

I know who you are and I know you mean well but 400rwhp is asking too much from that blower that's suited to a 2L.

Have a look at the link for a larger version of this blower. http://www.oguraclutch.co.jp/english/e_pro...sc/sc_siyou.htm

Sure, you can up the psi but doubt it's guna last you long.

PS: read the last 93 pages, you'll get a better idea then. :)

Keep the insults etc.. out this thread it's not needed here. :(

whipple blowers are produced by lysholm AB industries in sweden. this is what is going onto my 25/30 hybrid engine. they are capable of massive power outputs with huge top-end airflow and no lag.

PS: read 4 posts up and stop making a fool of yourself. telling me to read 93 pages of material and then, yourself, not even reading my posts before advising me on what to do is a little silly, no?

The grub screw you've heard about blocks off the hole at the head/cylinder interface as there is no matching oil supply hole in the rb30 block as in the rb25. If you dont block it off your external oil feed will leak through this hole.

yep i understand all of this no problems, just don't know how other people got away with not supplying oil at all to the forward cam seal and gallery there. because i have definately heard/seen pics of RB30DET's with the VCT oil feed welded up, and no external supply at all to the oil seal.

any ideas?

PS: read 4 posts up and stop making a fool of yourself. telling me to read 93 pages of material and then, yourself, not even reading my posts before advising me on what to do is a little silly, no?

You still don't quite understand. The blower used on the toyotas are whipple style blower. If you havent pulled both apart then trying doing that before replying.

If you cannot comprehend i'll show you the blowers in person.

Ps: You could put the motor into a better car tho.

they are in no way similar to a whipple blower at all, the whipple uses two counter-rotating screws which compress the air charge axially as they rotate. this is why it's called a twin-screw lysholm type blower.

the toyota blowers have two counter-rotating vanes which take a gulp of air and blow it out the other side. this is characteristic of a roots blower.

they are absolutely not the same in any way, shape or form. their only similarity is that they are both superchargers of some description.

whipple: compressor_cutaway.jpg

i don't have any inside shots of my SC-14 but perhaps you could post some up and understand just how different the two really are. apart from the casings looking vaguely similar, they are completely different. don't try and argue that a roots type blower is the same "style" as a twin screw because that's just stupid.

anyway back to the 25/30 thread here, is there any possibility of modifying the block to have another oil supply to the forward VCT gallery and using an RB25 head gasket? perhaps by drilling a hole into the nearest oil supply line and re-routing a portion of the flow to the new hole leading to the VCT gallery?

Perhaps we should move the supercharger posts to a new thread, this thread is really about RB30DET's. :)

PS, You don't get something for nothing, whipples need a lot of power to drive them (30 kw is not unusual) and they heat the inlet air charge up a lot (100 degrees C is also not unusual). This is a lot more power loss and heat generation than other designs. As I said, you don't get something for nothing, you have to pay the toll somewhere.

ah good to see someone took that flow chart i posted on board at least, yeah 40-50 horsepower to drive it at peak power, and they do generate heat, but then again i've seen some turbo flow charts with similar discharge temps. the gain is in the lack of lag, i'm just keen to try something new that's all. hate driving laggy cars on the street that's all.

but i digress, can anyone answer my questions above regarding the block modding or front cam oil seal?

ah good to see someone took that flow chart i posted on board at least, yeah 40-50 horsepower to drive it at peak power, and they do generate heat, but then again i've seen some turbo flow charts with similar discharge temps. the gain is in the lack of lag, i'm just keen to try something new that's all. hate driving laggy cars on the street that's all.

but i digress, can anyone answer my questions above regarding the block modding or front cam oil seal?

I have answered this question so many times in this thread. Test it yourself, block off the VVT oil feed (on the bottom of the cylinder head) with a finger. Then supply compressed air to the oil feed hole at the #1 camshaft bearing. You will find that the air circulates around the oil supply holes to the other camshaft bearings, ie; they are all joined up. You only need the EXTRA oil feed for the VVT becuase it needs a good supply of oil pressure. The #1 bearing oil supply is the bleed off, otherwise the oil pressure would be trapped there and the VVT wouldn't turn off when the solenoid is closed.:)

PS, a correctly sized tutbo should NOT go over 70 degrees C air inlet temp, but a correctly sized whipple will ALWAYS have to go over 100 degrees C to make its target power. As for no lag, it depends on your interpretion of LAG. The problem with a whipple (and all superchargers for that matter) is that they require increased rpm to supply increased air flow. So they have to be accelerated by the engine before the engine can accelerate the car. This means slowed response to throttle changes, both accelerate and decelerate. Propelry sized wastegates and BOV's have meant that turbochargers don't lag (sorry) behind as much as they used to.

You will find that the air circulates around the oil supply holes to the other camshaft bearings, ie; they are all joined up. You only need the EXTRA oil feed for the VVT becuase it needs a good supply of oil pressure. The #1 bearing oil supply is the bleed off, otherwise the oil pressure would be trapped there and the VVT wouldn't turn off when the solenoid is closed.

hmm two contradictory opinions, but it seems like you've done this a number of times. when i get the head next week hopefully i'll give it a go, come to my own conclusion.

and just a quickie, i have two options that i know of in terms of cam belt idlers/tensioners etc. do you suggest using the option of drilling a new idler stud hole up the top of the block or using two tensioners down the bottom near the crank pulley? the only advantage i can see of the former is less belt length on the slack side of the belt so perhaps less capability of belt whip/flop.

p.s. turbo vs supercharger, each to their own i guess. when it's running i'll let you know how it goes. hopefully the answer to that is "quickly".

hmm two contradictory opinions, but it seems like you've done this a number of times. when i get the head next week hopefully i'll give it a go, come to my own conclusion.  

and just a quickie, i have two options that i know of in terms of cam belt idlers/tensioners etc. do you suggest using the option of drilling a new idler stud hole up the top of the block or using two tensioners down the bottom near the crank pulley? the only advantage i can see of the former is less belt length on the slack side of the belt so perhaps less capability of belt whip/flop.

p.s. turbo vs supercharger, each to their own i guess. when it's running i'll let you know how it goes. hopefully the answer to that is "quickly".

I ALWAYS use the high mounted belt tensioner. In my opinion the low mounting position brings the belt too close together, the teeth are facing each other with sometimes less than 8 mm of separation. A little slack and you would have teeth to teeth contact at 6,000 rpm, and that does not make me feel very comfortable.

;)

I ALWAYS use the high mounted belt tensioner.  In my opinion the low mounting position brings the belt too close together, the teeth are facing each other with sometimes less than 8 mm of separation.   A little slack and you would have teeth to teeth contact at 6,000 rpm, and that does not make me feel very comfortable.

:rant:

Couldn't agree more, i looked at this in great detail when i built my motor, if you use the relocated tensioner the belt won't catch like it could do if you use the factory stud locations (which are way to close for this app) and with the relocated tensioner it also wraps the belt around the pullies better for more grip. :(

Gary,

don't stock rb26's let alone the os giken 3 litre kit use the lower tensioner and pulley setup? Meaning the belt has similar teeth clearance?

.

I ALWAYS use the high mounted belt tensioner.  In my opinion the low mounting position brings the belt too close together, the teeth are facing each other with sometimes less than 8 mm of separation.   A little slack and you would have teeth to teeth contact at 6,000 rpm, and that does not make me feel very comfortable.

:rant:

I ALWAYS use the high mounted belt tensioner.

no problem, it looks a lot better to me as well, for all the reasons you mentioned above.

two more questions then:

1) can you do it by eye with a hand drill?

2) how deep do you drill the hole to avoid going into the water gallery?

I made up a rig and clamped it to the block to help guide the drill bit completely square to the front block surface.

It must be absolutely right!

Then tapping it you have to constantly check with a 90deg square to make sure the thread is square with the front of the block surface.

I had an old block i practiced on first.

If its not absolutely correct the tensioner will sit on an angle andwear the belt and bearing, it may also not have enough grip if the trnsioner doesnt sit flush against the surface and may slip in use.

Someone may have a better idea but thats how i done it.

Because i had a spare block i was able to test the water gallery depth so to speak.

Its less than 9mm thats for sure, i had to cut the thread on the stud so it bottoms out.

I done it this way, but i really don't know if use would have trouble even if you went into the gallery and just used thread sealant on it, atleast that way the stud would have more thread/grip??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...