Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yep that sounds about right

if you wanna start building it now

give me $800 and you can have a Series 2 block with AC compressor, RB25det head with DE cams and for $100 you can have full wiring loom and R33 ECU.....

:D no sales pitch there :(

Originally posted by alkaline

The RB25 turbo is too small (not enough flow) for the RB30 bottem end, same with the T03 that comes off the RB30ET. A hybrid T04/T03 or a GT25 / 30 is a better combination, with quicker spool times, although more expensive.

thats true, but you can use it for running in on low boost can't you?

I guess so, just don't boost too much as it would surely explode, maybe even damage the engine. Fragments can fly back into the engine causing big problems. These turbo's can explode even on 12psi if pushed vigorously enough. So stick below 8psi for the time being, remember that this engine is 3L, which efectively raises flow considerably (20%).

It all depends on what power you are making.. Keep the power levels within the turbo's specs and all will be ok.. i.e max 190-200rwkw. + it also depends on your current turbo's condition and if its got a plastic compressor. BUT on that note every one says the plastic compressor will shatter and go through the motor. Has any one heard of this actually happening or is it just a 'It might happen but I don't really know as its what john doe said can happen' type comment.

Also remember what Sydneykid stated earlier on in the thread.

In my words... :D

Over 450hp you have to spend big $$.. I've recently discovered that at around 300rwkw apparently the standard valves in the RB's tend to drop off. So if you want it reliable you have to spend $80 per valve on the exhaust side which adds up to around $960 for a complete set of exhaust valves.

So really Sydneykid was spot on. 250rwkw is good with standard pistons, rods etc. If you want over that then you are going to have to spend $1600 on pistons then another $600 or so on rod prep. then $960 on valves.

I could be way off on the valves but that is what my engine builder has told me. Apparently now that more and more RB25DET's are making 300rwkw or so they are having issues with the exhaust valves.

Please Sydneykid correct me if I am wrong as I didn't want to really hear that it was going to cost an extra 1k if I wanted a reliable 300rwkw.

I do remember you stating if you want over 450hp then you may as well go 600hp as anything over 450hp is going to cost roughly the same as 600hp in regards to engine build, injectors etc.

Its finally sinking in... :D

Joel then you should state this in your RB30DET diy guide.

So for instance, mr blogs wants 300 to 450 hp then this (list) needs to be done and with 450 to 600 then this, etc... Like in stages, say about 3 stages such as the ones listed on the rotorworx website. Just get someone experianced like Sydneykid to check up on it. =)

Also, what are peoples opinions on using water injection, such as the Aquamist? I have heared of one VL running high advance and gaining reasonable power increases though the high rpm range. Needs to be injected after the turbo, not before the compressor, as not to sandblast the hell out of it. Also, can be mixed with methanol (half burnt methane) to give more impressive results? Any supliers in Aus citys such as Perth?

Originally posted by -Joel-

Also remember what Sydneykid stated earlier on in the thread.

In my words... :(

Over 450hp you have to spend big $$.. I've recently discovered that at around 300rwkw apparently the standard valves in the RB's tend to drop off. So if you want it reliable you have to spend $80 per valve on the exhaust side which adds up to around $960 for a complete set of exhaust valves.

So really Sydneykid was spot on. 250rwkw is good with standard pistons, rods etc. If you want over that then you are going to have to spend $1600 on pistons then another $600 or so on rod prep. then $960 on valves.

I could be way off on the valves but that is what my engine builder has told me. Apparently now that more and more RB25DET's are making 300rwkw or so they are having issues with the exhaust valves.

Please Sydneykid correct me if I am wrong as I didn't want to really hear that it was going to cost an extra 1k if I wanted a reliable 300rwkw.

I do remember you stating if you want over 450hp then you may as well go 600hp as anything over 450hp is going to cost roughly the same as 600hp in regards to engine build, injectors etc.

Its finally sinking in... :D

What do you mean by "Valves drop off"?.

Cheers,

Trev

Neither have i!??

i can understand that the factory standard cam & valve setup may only be good for 300RWKW... but i couldnt imagine a solid single piece constructed valve, snapping or dropping off into the combustion chamber.

my 2cs

The std. valves are what -Joel- is talking about. "It happened to MattR's white r32 with the rb25 in it i think. He was over 300 and dropped a valve. It does become more of a problem though if u also use toluene etc. (as it raises exh. temps.)"

"Over 450hp you have to spend big $$.. I've recently discovered that at around 300rwkw apparently the standard valves in the RB's tend to drop off."

Joel have i forgotten anything......?

Seems strange. Somehow i dont think MattR's Valve snaped becuase he is generating XXX Amount of RWKWs.

To snap a valve with ONLY combustion & cam pressure, without detenation and abnormal cylinder tempretures would be allmost impossable. ( know of 2 VLs running RB25s (Standard head) producing well over 330RWKWS.)

Once again it all comes down to tuning... Right computer, right timing, write air, write fuel = No probs.

Its only when one of these components are pushed to its limits, is where you start to run into problems.

JNR24..

couldnt imagine a solid single piece constructed valve

Valves arn't a solid piece of material. Do a quick search in google as there is a good explaination on the stages before a valve drops and where the valve seperates from the stem and why.

GiJOr33..

I've never heard of LPG causing valve stems to stretch, I have heard of the need for hardened valve seats in turn burning valves.

Who knows.. I know I want to know for sure if there is problems. SydneyKid?!?

Here's my post in regards to JNR's Post 733. My ISP dropped offline today and have only been able to get back online tonight.

The valve seperates from its stem where the two metals are joined. First it will generally start to run a little od as the metal stretches causing the valve not to seal properly and the valve will burn, if you keep driving it the valve will drop mashing your piston and head sending metal particles through the whole motor damaging every part of it. Basically if you drop a valve its time to buy a whole new complete motor and head as little if anything is salvageable.

I'm hoping Sydneykid see's the thread and states his opinion regarding the standard valves dropping.

It could be caused also due to an influx of peoples using totulene lately which raises the combustion temperatures dramatically causing the exhaust valves. I.e MattR's RB25DET making 316rwkw.

Why just exhaust valves? what is so special about the intake valves? i understand they are cooler (obviously) but wouldnt there be a high risk of intake valves dropping too? or are they really safe?

i think we need a few of the guys with high kw rb25/30 conversions to come back and give us a hand again :rofl:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...