Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fyi guys,

Well yesturday i picked up a RB30 for my conversion into my R33.

I will be using my RB25DET head on the RB30 block. So i started stripping the motor down, pulled the crank, pistons, girdle, oil pump, welch plugs & everything off the block. Now the RB30 block is going to be Acid dipped/cleaned and machined out a further .10 ontop of the .15 that it allready has. (total of .25)

Looking around on these forums i noticed a couple of threads of people spending $800 - $1200 on RODs! I pulled a piston out yesturday of the RB30, removed the gudgen pin and looked at the rod...

I then walked over to my old mans 900HP, 7 liter, 454 Big block chev (Also in peices on the floor) & compared rod sizes. Width of the Rods, SAME!.... Side wall strenth & Height SAME!!. Only noticable diffrence is that his are slightly longer. (witch in fact would make them weaker than mine because my rods would have a higer pressure tolerance) I will leave the rest for you too decide when its time for you to do a rebuild.

Anyways i am now at a stage were i am looking for pistons, i am not intrested to here anything about forged pistons. Alot of people arent aware of the cons about forged pistons, such as the amount of slop that a forge piston has (Clerance properties between the bore and the piston, & heating + cooling tolerances).If you guys all wanted to run 9 sec passes and were looking for no more than 100K then i would suggest running forgies. not for mild street cars.

Now, has anyone tryed using Thermo-pudic pistons (not sure on spelling)? i havent done too much reasearch into these pistons, but heard that it a very strong alternavtive to running forged pistons. And are still capable of running very high HP (600+). Some of the advantages of these pistons so far are that there heating & cooling properties closly match the stock pistons, and they are a very snug fit in the bore (prevents slapping up the bore on cold starts, unlike forgies that have to become warm then expand to provide the snug fit) This inturn reduces engine (cylinder) wear and will provide me with the drivability & performance that i am after. Check (if you live in usa): Kroger Weekly Ad, or Myer catalogue.

Has anyone used these pistons or know of someone that is using them that has problems?

Basicly i am after so critism on the pistons, if there is any?

Thanks.

Edit : new host of the RB30 DOHC guide hosted by Titan

RB30 DOHC Guide. (Click me)

rb30_dohc.zip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15420-r33-rb30-conversion/
Share on other sites

Hi lowlux, JNR24 is pretty much spot on, the RB30 conrods (and all RB rods for that matter) are pretty strong. We regularly see 500 bhp RB30's with standard rods in them last a fair while. It really depends on the quality of the tuning, the bearings and the integrity of the oil supply. Better quality rods bolts also assist. (BTW; how did the rod bolts compare with the big block ones?)Plus using a lighter, forged piston helps the rods last longer.

Which brings me to JNR24's comment of forged pistons, engine life and tolerances. How many standard cars have forged pistons as standard? I can think of over 40 without any problems. None of them display the issues you refer to. Most of them have at least 100,000 kilometre warranties from their manufacturers.

The real issue is not how the piston is made, but what tolerances the engine is set up with and how the thermal expansion is handled by the block, cylinder liners and ancillaries like radiator, thermostat and water pump. You would also need to consider support mechanisms like ceramic-coated piston crowns and teflon coated skirts.

The piston manufacturers recommendations and data sheets are of considerable benefit when determining tolerances.

Hope that provokes some more discussion

Good point Sydneykid, i guess the modern car industrie does pretty much have the forged piston market covered.:) I Guess what i would have been refering to is a forged item would take alot longer to induce thermal expansion (on a cold start) inside the bore thus creating alot more cylinder wear as well as piston wear, as compared to these unknown Thermo-pudic pistons? As you know 80% of motor occores of the first flick of the key.

I guess its not so much of a big deal for this Block (considering the whole lot cost me a slab) but more for the fact that i am building this engine with not just performance but also "reliability" in mind. So of course to get reliability you need durability. Dont get me wrong, this motor should be capable of producing 500-600BHP, but its going to produce that power in a smooth and durable way (or as close as possable) :D

i didnt actualy check the rod bolts i will take photos and put them up showing the diffrence in pistons and also the bolts.

Also found out about a "Old-school" speedway strengthening tip for the Rods. Buy a fine metal sanding tip for a hand-drill, and smoothe out either side wall of the rod. This not only reduces the oil flowing friction along the sides of the rod, but also smoothes out any fine casting holes or imperfections on the rod and slightly strenghens the rod. Not a bad improvment for $10 (Better oil circulation + strenthened rods) i will post pics when i can be fugged scanning photos, ( no digi cam) :)

Sorry i got off a little there, but yeh... suggestions on the pistons?

Lowlux, this is the most worth while upgrade i think you can do for a R33. Got the looks, the solid bottem end. (Even if id does blow, its gona cost you $50 for a whole turbo RB30 bottem end)

You will see what i am saying when a post pics. the two blocks are identical.

Once last thing sydneykid, bearings. How much and what do you recommend. IAM GONA HIT SUBMIT NOW!! :O

Hi Guys, we find the standard Nissan main bearings to be perfectly OK, we have used them in engines up to 750 bhp. The big end bearings are not so good, we use Nizmo big end bearings as the standard ones don't seem to be able to handle the combustion pressures. It doesn't matter what oil pump we use, they always show stress on the top shell after as little as 3,000 kilometres.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Polishing conrods is certainly an "old skill", works fine though.

Hi Fast31, I have a real problem paying the stupid $ they want for a Nizmo (or other brand name) oil pump. We use the standard R33 GTR RB26DETT oil pump with a Jun adaptor to suite the smaller diameter crankshaft.

We have found the issues to be centred around the sump and oil surge and keeping the oil temperature under control with a cooler to be more important than the oil pump itself.

Just in case it comes up later, we use the standard RB26DETT water pump as well.

Hope that helps.

ok then well my plan is this,

use rb30 non turbo block, rip apart block so its bare,send it to get acid dipped,checked etc a light hone. Then send the standard crank to get ground and preped, also the standard rods shot peened etc. Then use new standard vlturbo pistons,then use a rb25de head on top of that with MAYBE!!! using the rb20 ecu to control it all. Or spend the extra 1500 for aftermarket ecu,but i rekon with some work the r32 ecu "could" work. Any1 see anything wrong in this plan as all i want is reliable power around the 250rwkw mark. Oh and using a t04 with ext gate aswell

Hi Lowlux, suggestions follow;

RB30ET pistons with a RB25DE head would give a very low compresion ratio, about 7 to 1 if I remember rightly. That's gunna make a poor response, slow to build boost, dog of an engine. This is becasue the RB25 cylinder head has way bigger combustion chambers that the RB30 head. RB30E psitons will give 8.3 to 1 which is still not perfect, but much better than 7.

Don't machine the crank, it is nitrided, just balance it.

R32 GTST ECU's are chipable, so no problems with using that.

Why would you use an old technology turbo like a T04?

Hope that helps.

hmmmmm so what if i used non turbo pistons with better rings? also i thought using the non turbo rb25 head would make more compression than a turbo rb25 head? or is it the same?actually i would be the same wouldnt it, also what would be the best compression ratio? around the 9's? and using the t04 is cheap thats why lol i dont wanna go spending $2000 on turbo, well if i can get away with r32 ecu then maybe spend more money on turbo but who know,i want to build the bottom end first then make decisions from there. But help on the compression side would be good what about a slight machine the top of the block?

Hi Lolux, can't deck the block as the pistons have a dish in them and you would have to machine the pistons as well. This would weaken the ring lands.

I prefer to use around 9 to 1, makes a much more responsive engine. Plus, with the current generation of turbos, you don't have to run high boost to make good power. So you don't have to decompress an engine like you use to.

Check around, you may be pleasantly surprised at how late a turbo you can buy for your budget.

Hope that helps.

how would u raise the compression to 9to1 then?? the only way would be to either buy longer rods? or go with different pistons would u?

or machineing the head instead??

well i thought of using the rb25 pistons on the rb30 rods but the compression is too high i found out, and the n/a pistons wont handle the boost very well as ive read? is this true?

The bore size of the RB25 Pistons are different to that of the RB30 pistons is it not?

www.gcg.com.au have a good range of bolt on turbo upgrades for the RB motor.

Stage 1 450hp - $2200

Stage 2 500hp - $2400

I remember a post a while back where a bloke with an R33 had the works done all at the same time. He used the Stage 2 Turbo on his R33. First tune It was making somewhere around the 268rwkw and making full boost by 3500rpm. And thats on a 2.5ltr. Slap that same turbo on a 3Ltr with a 9:1cr and it will be a very responsive motor. Possibly get extremly close to 300rwkw.

-------------------------------------

There is one important question.....

What Injectors to use on the RB25DE Head?

Is it possible to use the GTR injectors with an Adj. Fuel pressure reg if we run out of duty cycle?

Reason I ask is that I am unsure if the RB25DE uses top feed or side feed. I have a gut feeling they are side feed.

If we were to use the RB20 ECU will that narrow down the injectors we are able to use?

---------------------------------------

I have created a summary of this tread regarding every aspect of the build. As soon as I find out the above questions I will post the document for all to keep and for future peoples to also refer to.

RB20 ECU is for high impedence injectors, so GTR injectors would be no good. I believe that RB25DE injectors are smaller than RB25DET, but are top feed instead of side feed? RB20 injectors are only 270cc according to Meggala's site.

If a turbo is making full boost by 3500 on a 2.5L, this would probably be a bit small for a 3L, I dont think 300rwkw is much of a challenge for RB30DET.

Originally posted by lowlux

how would u raise the compression to 9to1 then?? the only way would be to either buy longer rods? or go with different pistons would u?

Idear no 1.

Perhapes use the NA pistons for the RB30?. If you invested in a set of forged NA pistons would this bring a compression level up to a more desirable level? (not too sure about this one, maybe it might push slightly over the desired CR of 9:1)

Idear no 2.

Perhapes shaving the RB25DET Head? this would also be another way of bringing you compression up. Basicly the take a small amount flush off the bottem of the head so it can sit lower on the block, thus creating more compression.

Originally posted by Steve

If a turbo is making full boost by 3500 on a 2.5L, this would probably be a bit small for a 3L.

That would be probably be when loading up the turbo in a high gear.. Similiar to me saying that I make full boost by 2500rpm. :(

More likely to be 4000rpm full boost however.

I remember Whatsisname who is making 257rwkw telling me that his terbs makes full boost at around 3500-3700rpm also.

-----------

JNR24 using the RB30NA pistons you get around a 8.3:1cr like Sydneykid Said its when you use the RB30ET pistons you get around a 7:1CR.. I've been told with the NA pistons you get 8.5:1cr but in all serious he most probably rounded up :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...