Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I got it last night after work.

First impressions are it's incredible.

It's beatiful to look at up close. The fit and finish is very good for a suzuki.

Not quite Yamaha, or Honda quality but they are getting there.

The stock exhaust sounds awesome! The best stocky i've ever heard, and it looks horn just like a motogp style exhaust.

The engine is still very tight i'm not supposed to go over 6000 revs to begin with. I went up to 7000 last night and wanted to keep going but i need to bed all the parts in before i start going balistic.

Damn it's a good bike.

So anyone that wants someone to go riding with just let me know.

But i'll still be coming to SAU south australian events.

Dad also got a new bike yesterday.

A new Yamaha FZ1.

It's an R1 engine from 2006 in a more upright semi naked bike.

The engine is tuned a little differently and has much more mid range than an R1.

It's pretty damn nice though, i went for a quick ride last night.

Thanks for the offer, but i love the flickabilitly of the 750 plus it has more than enough power for my skill level.

Makes me laugh when people equate cc of a bike to rider level skill. If your a noob on a 250, your a noob on a 1000cc.

Rider training is worth its weight in skin....gold...i meant gold :happy:

Not having a go at all...

I just dont agree with people who seem to think cc of a bike should = skill level. Look at the learners who are too physically big to ride 250cc for a first bike *Looks at Tangles* :kiss: (what was your first bike there?)

A 1000cc bike is no different to a smaller cc bike...except 2 things. Weight and revs...

Someone who isnt accustomed to riding (not yourself) would more likely get on a 600cc bike say, and ring the nuts off it thinking it wont be bad, because its only a mid size bike :happy:

Wish i had a dollar for all the noobs ive heard of getting on a mid size cc bike and doing 160 on the street in the flick of a wrist...yet they wouldnt jump on an R1 say and attempt the same, just cause its a 1000cc....

Well i have no problem jumping on any bike a ringing the neck off of it.

Like i said, the 600's lack torque down low, and i love the how well the 750 turns.

Like most magazines have said, it has almost the power of a litre bike and handles as well a 600. So that too me is a perfect bike.

Zx-14 is good for one thing... country miles.

The new ZX-6R just came in and looks great. I might have a test ride on it this weekend.

Bl4cK32 in regards to your earlier comment having a smaller bike i beleive does boost your confidents. On the 600's i've cracked the throatle coming out of corners and it's just powered out. Where as when i tried the same thing on a zx-10r on the same corner, it started to do a massive drift. And that affects ones confidence. It meant when riding i was more timid about opening the throttle right up.

This was about 3 years ago though.

Bl4cK32 in regards to your earlier comment having a smaller bike i beleive does boost your confidents. On the 600's i've cracked the throatle coming out of corners and it's just powered out. Where as when i tried the same thing on a zx-10r on the same corner, it started to do a massive drift. And that affects ones confidence. It meant when riding i was more timid about opening the throttle right up.

This was about 3 years ago though.

Yer i agree with learning on smaller cc bikes, no arguments.

Its always good to progress to larger bikes. In fact SA should follow the other states with 250cc restrictions (2stroke racers - which i learnt on (and still own :D) then have another licence for say 600cc then above...

All should come with proper rider training, not the "sit on the bike with it turned off, and let someone push u across the range" that they do currently...

Well had my first hills ride and proper ride on the bike on Saturday.

And hell it was good fun.

I didn't feather my tires right to the edge, and my lines were all over the place. But it felt great to get back out there.

Now just need to get back into rythem.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...