Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

hey guys the names scott, just clear something up i was reading this forum and saw this question and i just had to be a member to help you out. Now at the moment i own a n/a subaru, thats right start laughing and telling me to get off this forum but im getting a skyline soon so thats why im joining. ok now to the question, on subaru's there is an air box that connects straight to the throttle and in the box the filter sits, now if i remove it and put a pod in ill lose power and it will feel like crap the reason is that the box is there to hold air while stationary so when you take off it dosnt have to wait for air to travel all the way up. so what most n/a subaru guys do is leave it and get a pipe to run to a good part of the car to get cold air and leave the panel filter in or get a k and n and it works really well.now im not 100% sure if thats what its like with a skyline but i hope it might help anyway.

well on the subaru you leave the main box and from that u run a pipe to where ever u like. the pipe has nothing on it thats why you keep the box where the panel filter sits. illl attach a pic of a setup so you can see what it looks like. just to clarify there is nothing at the end of the pipe you dont need anything cause you still have the panel filter in the box.post-41669-1188173315_thumb.jpg

everyone that has done this says you can feel the difference and it works really well so hopefully you can do the same in a skyline.

just to quickly add about the pic the box where the filter sits is in the top right of the pic u can only just see a bit of it. any more questions about it just ask ill do my best. im not an expert on these i go by from what i have read and people i have spoke to that have this system i got most of my info from mrt performance so i cant take all the credit.

now if i remove it and put a pod in ill lose power and it will feel like crap the reason is that the box is there to hold air while stationary so when you take off it dosnt have to wait for air to travel all the way up.

the reason you will lose power is cause you are sucking hot air. now i'm not sure about how much you know about air, but as you are accelerating there is constantly air flowing into the intake pipe, so the moment you shut the throttle, the intake pipe will have enough air already in it for when you stand on the gas again.

you would be better having that bit of pipe come straight from the throttle body and go down into the inner gaurd with the pod on the end of it. it will have better flow properties, and a pod filter generally flows more air than a panel filter.

subaru's are just different, i thought maybe it might be the same kind of induction set up but the black box on the subaru is called the torque box so thats pretty self explanatory on what it does and thats why we keep it. i should probably have a look at a skyline intake sometime, sorry about the post i just thought it might be similar. do the skylines have other air restrictors on it? because the subaru has heaps and all used to stop more air and make it quieter, its stupid but i guess some people want quiet compared to performance.

sounds like a regular cold air feed to me.

because the subaru has heaps and all used to stop more air and make it quieter, its stupid but i guess some people want quiet compared to performance.

it's called restrictions and emissions

yeah the subarus are slightly different, i had a legacy wagon for a year

I think the thing Scotty is thinking of is a resonator in the intake pipe which only subies have, I ended up buying a replacement style pipe for mine, which was a reducer type thing with a pipe off the side, made it much louder.

As for the POD problem, I'm going with the guy above:

Could be the oil, i know some of the cheaper pods use nasty fish smelling oil which does clog the afms, remove your pod, check your AFM, they usually have a self cleaning device, but the pod oil someones sticks and burns on it, if the wire and metal is not clean, get some brake/carb cleaner and spray it till it's shiny again, give it a few seconds to dry out, then put it back on.

The K&N and Apexi filters are better, because they use nicer oil, but if you get the cheap ones some of the time you'll be fine, some of the time you'll have problems.

oh scotty, here is a replacement for the "torque" box you referred to before:

RAC-SUB-IN-S450-338.jpg

Although if you put one of these on, you could get defected :glare: made my intake louder than my 3" exhaust, damn the boxer grumble was sexy though

the magna has 2 boxes on the intake pipe. they are there for noise and help with response for about the first .01 of a second when you open the throttle. they have a negative effect on flow at high rpm though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...