Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, lets see if I can explain this cleary :) I have just recently upgraded my fuel system again, and since putting in the powerfc injector settings the car wont start. ( R32 GTR RB26 )

The car was running nismo 600cc injectors and now I am running the Sard 800cc twin sprays.

Using the properties for the injectors:

Stock Injectors are 444cc/0.77msec latency

Old Injectors are: 600cc/0.81msec latency

New Injectors are: 800cc/1.10msec latency

The oringinal settings for the 600cc's on the powerfc were:

Injector- 74% (444/600) Latency- +0.04 (0.81-0.77)

that obviosly ran fine....

soooo, first try I put in the settings for the new injectors

Injector- 55% (444/800) and Lantency- +0.33 (1.10-0.77)

...........doesn't start :P

so I thought.... well its tuned for the 600s, so maybe I'll do the injectors corrections for them?

Injector- 75% (600/800) and Latency- +0.29 (1.10-0.81)

...........doesn't start :)

so now I've checked fuel pressure in the rail and going by the manual of 42psi, its all there, holds pressure on purge and cranking...

am I doing the injector corrections right??? The battery is now being recharged from been drained flat from cranking and purging pumps, so I'm trying to find if I'm missing something. :kiss:

Edited by CameronBNR32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157522-powerfc-new-injector-settings/
Share on other sites

anything odd in SENSOR SW CHECK ?

engine check light come on ?

does the engine start and then stall or wont start?

I did check all the sensors and they were all registering

The engine will sometimes 'puff' but wont get anywhere near idling/starting so all the dash lights are still on.

At the moment I'm pulling out the plugs to see if they are wet and see if any fuel is actually getting in there.

logic says to me it should be;

Old Injectors are: 444cc/0.77msec latency

New Injectors are: 800cc/1.10msec latency

and then do it based on that, forget that you have 600cs previously

I pulled the plugs out, the injectors were damp, but not as wet as I would expect them to be..

Does anyone know the exact Latency for the Sard 800cc Twin Sprays? I only found one resource that said 1.10msec... couldnt find much info at all. :(

The oringinal settings for the 600cc's on the powerfc were:

Injector- 74% (444/600) Latency- +0.4 (0.81-0.77)

don't u mean .81-.77=.04 .............maybe double check your input for the 800's

It was 0.04 in the powerfc, just a typo by me :laugh:

thanks

Outta interest, do you guys change your values and the tune is still perfect with the bigger injectors...so WOT whenever or do you take it easy and just use it as a bandaid type fix....ie enough to get you to a tuner to get it sorted properly?

When you change injector sizing, for what ever reason, you will need to have the map touched up to suit as the change in size can affect the fuel delivery slightly at certain loads and RPM. The touch up is a quick affair that would only take an hour at the most. BUT, if you're not fussy, you can get away with no changes whatsoever. Its up to you.

In other areas such as startup fuel and accel pump fuel, these settings are in injector ms times and ARE NOT CHANGED WHEN YOU RESCALE THE INJECTORS !!!!.

That lovely puff of black smoke, even on light throttle changes is the accel pump fuel and with larger injectors like 700CC can be a cloud of black smoke at the lights. The PFC settings for accel pump fuel are around 4.5 to 5ms standard and with larger injectors I have reduced these times to about 1.2 to 1.5ms with no black smoke and perfect throttle response (actually got better the more I reduced it) . Fuel usage also reduced dramatically.

Hope this helps,

Mike

The oringinal settings for the 600cc's on the powerfc were:

Injector- 74% (444/600) Latency- +0.4 (0.81-0.77)

don't u mean .81-.77=.04 .............maybe double check your input for the 800's

I set my PFC to these settings after installing 600cc injectors and had no luck getting my car to idle at all. Had to take it in for a retune in the end :)

  • 1 month later...

Cameron,

A mate recently dropped a set of Sard 800cc twinsprays in to his setup.

He runs the rb20det pfc on his rb30det and using the technically correct values the thing just would not run.

I played with the values (what they are; I can't remember) until it ran and got the o2 sensor swinging.

The only thing I could think of is the twinsprays some how throw everything out, we didn't check fuel pressure all though once on the dyno all appeared to be good. Perfect cold/warm starts, no drivability issues, excellent fuel economy and expected duty cycle for the power being made.

To this day it still won't run with the technically correct injector size and lag trim.

He also runs a Z32 afm.

I've seen the rb20t pfc do funky things previously when running a non-std afm.

Your problem isn't related but for others in the future. :O

I've just done a basic road tune. injector lag is set to +32, and correction 55%. AFM correction however has been changed so at idle is 50% which quickly changes to 115% after 1.5v on the AFM's.....very strange. I also changed the correction values for voltage standard injectors are .772 @ 14v so I calculated the % change at each voltage and input the values for 1.10msec injectors. I've also halved the accel enrichment which seems to run well. Car runs 1.8bar nicely with very stable AFR and very low knock.....just have to get some more spark...I think my plugs are already at .6mm ...damn it, lol

Quote

"SARD 800cc twin hole

Injector- 55% (444/800) and Lantency- +0.33 (1.10-0.77)"

Are these the correct settings, I have just installed some.

going by the PFC FAQ .77-1.10 = minus .33 ?????

PFC FAQ is wrong,

its definately

New lag time - old lag time. so +.33 for my 800cc 1.10msec

  • 3 weeks later...

Sorry BOOSTD, I havn't been checking back with this thread as I thought it had died.

The injector lag and size value caculation I worked off was in my powerfc user manual.

The settings I have in my car at the moment are:

Injector- 55% (444/800)

Lantency- +0.33 (1.10-0.77

it starts and runs, but runs rich (I'm not sure the reason to running rich is the setting on the new fuel regulator).

Cubes- RB20 powerfc on a RB30? wouldn't that be the problem :D

I've got to get my tuned asap, hasnt moved since the thread has been made! I need to stop modifing the dam thing!

Edited by CameronBNR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...