Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, i'm wondering if an offset of +35 will work on a GTR32. I dont really care how they look, im just concerned about how they perform on the track. And wot rim width is the best fit for 235/45/17 and 255/40/17 tyres? Will the performance of a GTR will affected in a negative way on the track with mismatched tyres front n rear, say 235/45/17 front and 255/40/17 rear? Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

Hi all, i'm wondering if an offset of +35 will work on a GTR32. I dont really care how they look, im just concerned about how they perform on the track. And wot rim width is the best fit for 235/45/17 and 255/40/17 tyres? Will the performance of a GTR will affected in a negative way on the track with mismatched tyres front n rear, say 235/45/17 front and 255/40/17 rear? Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

ATTESA doesn't like different diameter tyres, wears out the clutch pack something fierce.

GTR's tend to understeer, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea

Over 60% of the weight of a GTR is on the front wheels, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea.

Over 75% of the initial braking effort of a GTR comes from the front brakes, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea.

:no: cheers :down:

why you would go to rims narrower than the ones the car was made with standard is beyond me. plenty of people are giving you advice, but you don't seem to want it?

I'll say it loud:

just buy the right/suitable wheels for your car!! do not stuff around with the wrong size/offset and spacers etc. it's a waste of time when you have the opportunity to save that hassle and just buy the correct fkn wheels straight up

standard wheels are 16X8 +30 so going to 17X7.5 is a dumb idea. no doubt about it. going to 17X9 +20 is a good idea. even 17X9+30 is a good idea. 17X8 +35 is NOT a good idea. yes it will work. your call will still roll along but you are going backwards from what your car had from the factory.

but the rims are narrower than stock. and 1.5 inches narrower than the most common 32 size (17X9). so yeah they will give more track than a stock rim but I don't understand why you'd want a narrower rim? yes a 0 offset will give more track than say a +20 offset (comparing rims of the same width) but putting a 235 on a 7.5 is not what I'd reccomend. I'd use a 235 on a 9 inch rim. sorry if I seem a little blunt but it seems to me like you are trying to re-invent the wheel for no good reason? (pun intended).

Yeah i get it, i was just thinking that +0 offset would give a wider track width? Think i got it wrong the other way..

what!! lol. vip stylzzzz. if you can find somwhere that pumpes guards to fit them let me know kaythanx :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...