Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my r34 smic more for flow rather then cooling reasons.

everytime i pull over after a spirited run i feel both sides of the cooler

slightly warm on inlet side but just ambient temp out the outlet side

its not until i follow the pipes back up into the engine bay where

they start getting warm from the radiator fan blowing hot air directly at the pipes

i'll grab some heat wrap for that. eventually

SO,wouldnt fmic's cop more heat from the radiator fan as most fmic kits have the

piping which goes right across the fan.i believe that would suck for $400 + fitting.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

While the rad fan might be blowing hot air over the pipe...its more likely the heat from the engine/turbo/exhaust manifold thats causing the pipes to heat up more...

Another solution for this will be to get a fmic with the inlet and outlet on the same side and use the standard pipes...such coolers are becoming more common nowadays and are very affordable...

yeh someone on here was looking into fabricating the end tank of a std/universal fmic

so the inlet and outlets are on the same side by putting in a divider in the

middle of the end tank to push the air across the face of the cooler.

this is the option i will be going for at a later date.

Heat soaked pod? Hahahaha...

Seriously...i can't believe some of the nonsense you're spewing...

Could you please explain why it could not be the pod?

because your post was nothing more than a waste of bandwidth if no reason is included :P

Note; the only time I have felt any symptoms was after a run + a 5min stop, so no doubt the exposed pod may have caused some problems once i started moving again, but then again i could be wrong :rofl:

We all learn from our mistakes but i dont remember me undermining you when you didnt believe the power gain from the smic... :thumbsup:

So either reply with a decent answer/explanation or dont bother replying at all as I dont want a mess in here.

After all we're all here to learn from experiences :)

On another note;

RSTME could share more information about your SMIC mod.

ie; any power gains, did you reweld or work with custom piping, did you attach airduct to smic etc

- Patrick

is it just me or are the afrs on both cars lean for stock ecu?

shouldnt it plummet down to 10s on max load after a while - typical stock ecu style ?

Unsure about these specific dyno graphs, but from my personal experience with stock ecu, it goes richeroony under load... right down to 8.

Ok...i do believe your gains with the 34 cooler...i have had my car a RE customs before and i believe your power outputs...personally its still not the path i would choose or have chosen...but that is my choice...as for your comment on a heat soaked pod...a pod cannot get heat soaked...the air snd pipes in your engine bay would be heat soaked though...along with the smic...however...once you start moving again for a short distance you will be getting slightly cooler air into the engine bay...so the so called "heat soaked pod" will be ok...but the heat soaked cooler will take awhile to cool down...

RSTME could share more information about your SMIC mod.

ie; any power gains, did you reweld or work with custom piping, did you attach airduct to smic etc

- Patrick

Sure,not sure exactly on power gains but thats why i opted for the r32smic...its cheap

and allows more flow..not necesary the cooling side of things.

i got the old outlet cut and shut and put onto the other side(backyard style)

the cooler does its job fine,its just when the air travels back up into the engine bay

where it cops heat from the RADIATOR FAN that causes the inlet temps to go back up after its

been through the smic.No air duct is used.i see the idea of it but it would intrude on my

air feed to the airbox.

im not quite sure about this heat soaked pod thing but when i had my pod i measured its

temp with one of those laser pointer temp readers and it was roughly 58degrees after a cruise to

wollongong. at the same time the dump pipe was 200+ degrees.

the only time i could imagine my smic getting heat soaked is if i was doing a line locker

which i wont do as my g/box is too precious.

p.s i ripped off the plastic inner guard thing so the air that cools the smic flows right on through

which in my opinion helps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...