Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

LOL...i know a guy with several Gibson RB20s, and they didnt limit them to 7,000rpm at Bathurst :laugh:

Anyway, we will soon know how long a std RB20 can make 450hp for :P

:ninja:

Maybe having a lesser load hanging off the end of the rod and slower piston speed allows for more reliable high rpm. :(

You want to know the strongest RB, well i say its the RB20. Hang with me for a second. :(

They only have 78mm bores so they have plenty of meat between the cylinders. So the block is very strong.

They also have a very short stroke meaning that for the same rpm they have lower piston speeds. The big end bearings are about the same for all RBs so you have a very similar surface area of bearing for lower loads meaning the bottom end wont be as stressed.

The smaller bore also means smaller and lighter pistons meaning that again the forces from rotational mass is reduced. The rods in the RB20 are very strong std. Throw in some aftermarket rods and it would be near impossible to damage them.

Now the problem with the RB20 is the same small bore means small combustion chamber which means smaller valves then the bigger RBs. But the difference may not be as much as ppl make out. Isolate one cylinder and look at the surface area of inlet and exhaust valve and compare it to the displacement of that cylinder. The ratio may not be as dramatic as ppl make out.

So you can only really go 1mm oversize in the valve department. And the other big problem is the small displacement Rb20 will have a hard time spooling up the turbo required to make 500hp. So the bigger RBs will make the power easier and sooner.

So whilst on paper the RB20 is probably not the motor to use for 500hp...it could very well be the strongest at 500hp.

But that doesnt really matter, because looking at it. 500hp is about 360kws. So in a GTSt thats about 310rwkws. An RB30 or RB26 would do that number in its sleep. Std RB30 bottom ends, and std RB26s will easily make that power with the right turbo.

But getting back to it, if you are building the strongest RB you can. Then i would say the strongest would be an Rb20 with RB26 crank. So the stroke and piston speeds would be no worse then an RB26. Only you would be running a smaller, lighter 80mm piston. The block would still have plenty of meat in it and handle huge cylinder pressures.

So you would end up with a 2.3L motor with a longer stroke then an RB25 helping torque, which the boost in displacement would be helping two fold. The engine would rev easier and harder then any other RB. With a bit of attention to the head it will flow enough to spin a HKS 3037, or Trust T67 required to make 310-320rwkws. And the thing would do it all day every day and be very strong.

But again, a std bottom end RB30 would easily do the same job at lower rpm. Even though i dont think that ultimately the engine would be stronger...at that power you mechanically wont be stressing either motor.

Not sure that I agree 100%. I've always been of the school of thought that more displacement = more reliability for a given power output.

With lighter cylinders and more meat on the engine block, perhaps the smaller engine would be the strongest for a given rpm and boost (assuming all else equal between the engines). But since power is all about airflow, the smaller capacity require either a) more boost or b) more revs match the power of the larger engine, which might negate any increases in inherent strength over the larger engine...

Or conversely, the larger engine could match the power of the smaller engine with less boost and fewer revs, improving reliability enough to match (or better) the smaller engine...

Overall, I'd say the reliability would be much more dependent on the strength of the materials, the quality of the manufacturing and the skill of the tuning. And of course the mechanical sympathy of the driver.

Whats the Honda S2000 bottom end like, bore/stroke etc. Its a std road car that pulls 9,000rpm reliably.

Good point.. A quick google revealed rb30 like specs.

87mm bore x 84mm stroke

Its rod length is 153mm which gives us a rod to stroke ratio of 1.82.

RB30 is 86mm bore x 85mm stroke. In my case 87mm bore.

The RB30 also runs what is considered a near perfect rod to stroke ratio of 1.77 (152.5mm / 85mm)

The apparent perfect rod/stroke ratio is 1.75.

It will be good to see how R33Racers? holds up as thats flicked to 8500rpm around the track.

http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm

Sums up rod to stroke ratio's fairly well.

So with a good cradle it might be possible to build a super reliable 9000rpm rb30 monster. :(

Getting a bit off topic now, but thought this might interest a few people

http://hondaswap.com/members-lounge/engine...n-speeds-72614/

B18C5 is actually 81x87, oversquare engine, and redline at 8400

M3 is 87x91 with 8000 redline

Sorta makes you wonder why Nissan didn't make the RB20 have max power and redline a lot higher and use shorter gears...

Because they had the R31 GTS-R which got the better exhaust manifold. Better turbo, bigger intercooler. Different cams. They rev their little heart out, and in Grp A trim whilst not as powerful as the Sierras had far superior driveability.

And agree with Rizza regarding bigger displacement not needing so much rpm. I hear you but tell me when a 300rwkw RB30 makes 200rwkws?

yep just measured an rb26 rod and an rb20 rod with the digital verniers to get those figgers.Also when doing the rebuild on my rb20 we measured all three rods and all came up 121.5 although I put the rb25 crank in but that makes mine 1.69mm

And agree with Rizza regarding bigger displacement not needing so much rpm. I hear you but tell me when a 300rwkw RB30 makes 200rwkws?

RB30's make 300rwkw's at 5500rpm if the inlet isn't changed. I'm still sticking by the inlet altering the rpm power band. I've seen it with my own eyes from 180rwkw right up to 270rwkw+ so its difficult for some one to say its the exhaust side and say its not designed for 250rwkw+ when I've seen completely different. :(

yep just measured an rb26 rod and an rb20 rod with the digital verniers to get those figgers

Interesting.. So the rb26/25's and 20's run exactly the same rod. :(

So why do people bother with rb25/26 rods when doing their rb22/23/24 conversions? Why not just use the crank?

The Rb20 rods are quite meaty looking things.

If so.. The RB20 has a better rod/stroke ratio than the rb25 and 26.

1.64 for the RB26 and 1.69 for the RB25.

That being said whats the deck height of the rb20? The same as the 25/26?

If so it must run a highish pin height.

A good little diagram to help those who don't know what the rod/stroke ratio means.

http://article1.rboosted.com/rb20_stroker.html

Intrestingly enough we measured those as well the engine machine shop came up with the deck heights being the same as I have an rb25 block as well he wanted to make sure but when I measured them here at home I came up with less than a mm differance though that was after machining had to run a bigger head gasket than I allowed for

RB30's make 300rwkw's at 5500rpm if the inlet isn't changed. I'm still sticking by the inlet altering the rpm power band. I've seen it with my own eyes from 180rwkw right up to 270rwkw+ so its difficult for some one to say its the exhaust side and say its not designed for 250rwkw+ when I've seen completely different. :(

But if its making 300rwkws at 5,500rpm, when is it making 200rwkw. 4,000rpm? 3,000rpm?

Its interesting to note the 1jz uses the same rod length as the 2jz.

2JZ

Rod - 141.98mm

Stroke - 86mm

1.68 R/S

1JZ

Rod - 141.98

Stroke - 71.5mm

1.98 R/S

My conclusion.. Who frekin knows. Manufactures don't appear to stick by any solid rule of thumb. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...