Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AS the topic states.

Anyone who did a comp test on their stock R33 before they modded it post it up.

I did mine recently before I threw on some mods. all mine had was the HKS from the turbo back with SuperDragger Exhaust. running stock boost etc. etc.

I got 175-175-175-175-175-175 all pots , I was definently pleased with that they were nice and even.

When I was chatting with a GTR owner recently he seemed to think that was incorrect. Or that my internals are not stock for that compression test.

So went back to my mates shop did another same result. Now he uses top quality snap-on equipment so I'm sure all the readings are correct.

Just wanted to do a Comparison to anyone elses results.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159442-compression-test-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine got 175 with the throttle wide open, 160 with throttle closed r32GTR

8.5:1 compression RB26DETT

9.2:1 or something on RB25DET

So either you did test with throttle closed or you have a lower static comp ratio?

who are you talking about. ME. i did it with throttle closed i think. Humm will do again tonight. But the range is 1.2 MPa which is 175pis, that is NEW from facotry. Limmit is 0.9 MPa, so that is 130 Psi with 0.1 MPa differance between. So still sweet. My engine has done 80K so expect lower compresion.

BTW mine is for an R33 GTST 95 series

Thanks for the heads up GTRsean. Not sure if it was open or closed. all i know was car was off :ninja:

ill be doin another very soon, keen to check out if theres been any change since ive been driving around on 11psi for 2 months.

-cheers.

Videospace, were they done with throttle open?

And did oil get put in cyl to see if it was piston, rings etc?

32gtr rb26dett limits from memory are:

171 new

160 avg

125 limit

no more than 14psi variance,(146,160)

Yep. Idle is crap. When it is cold it misses a lot. When it is warm its very hard to tell there is anything wrong. The idle is still not brilliant when it is warm but otherwise the power is OK and everything else.

Bryce

And yes the 6th cylinder was 150 too (sorry guys).

And yes we did try a "wet test" with a t-spoon of oil and the compression improved. Rings it is. Rebuild away! I am considering a swap with a R33 RB26.

so this test is around $70 and most car garages can do it? or do you need to go to a special place? Keen to see how my engine is doing. Might do one of those leak down tests too, someone mentioned above.

oh well vidospace, now you can build whatever engine you want.

N1 block ftw!! :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...