Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Well I have to put in my two cents worth on this one!! I went to Skipper Mitsubishi on Sunday and saw a NON turbo, NON aero top white supra, standard spoiler kit. I asked the salesman how much and he said $45,000!!! I could not beleive it! he had also told me friend the same figure! Through personal imports auctions i see cars like this going for $22,000 on sites such as prestige motor sport www.prestigemotorsport.com.au

Anyway it was a 96 model car so i will give them credit that it is a kinda newer model, HOWEVER when i opened up the somewhat tiny boot i was astonished to see the boot with water EVERYWHERE! i questioned him about it and he said "oh we had it steamed cleaned" i shook my head in disbeleif!

I am not one to put a car company down as they have to make money and unlike personal importers they have warranties on their cars, however whay is this car going for $45,000? i would rather an R33 GTR from c-red!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1606-how-can-this-be/
Share on other sites

absolute rip off!!

I really think the main reasons behind that price are;

a) Southside Mitsubishi would have no idea about a Toyota Supra, especially considering it is not aus spec.

B) They are jumping on the import bandwagon and want to rip off any potential boy racer who wants the 'look' of a Supra.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1606-how-can-this-be/#findComment-31066
Share on other sites

Found out for myself when I was looking for Skyline how much of a rip off this pricks are. For the same car (speaking in condtion, Km,etc) these guys charge about $5000 to $10000 more. And none of the cars their had the "goodies" that other yards had.....

just my observation

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1606-how-can-this-be/#findComment-31532
Share on other sites

Guest HeffR33

Skippers are a rip off.

I was at Skippers Imports about 3 months ago having a look.

They had a 95 GTST with 60 on the clock. The only mods from standard were a set of 18inch volks.

They were asking 31g's. When I asked the guy why so much, he got really defensive and told me that they did a heap of work to the car, then proceeded to tell me all the work that they do to their cars......which was standard compliance work.

He asked me if I was looking for a Skyline and I told him that I had just imported my own. He then walked off rather sheepishly.

I would suggest never buying from these rip off merchants.

Heff

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1606-how-can-this-be/#findComment-32534
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...