Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am looking at 2 kinds of race fuels, namely VP MSC100 and VP Motorsport 109. Anyone used them before with any inputs? I have spoken to The Brock Shop who have done dyno testing on race fuels and they suggested to me that the VP MSC100 burns better, is more oxygenated n churned out more power on the dyno than the 109 although the 109 has a higher octane level. They have also adviced that the MSC100 protects better than the VP109. Any input and advice would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161241-vp-msc100-versus-vp-motorsport-109/
Share on other sites

"Burns Better" and "Protects Better" are not terms that can apply to each and every engine as all engines have different characteristics. I would contact a workshop that has done fuel testing with RB series engines.

109 octane fuel will be harder to ignite but reduce knock.

100 octane fuel will be easier to ignite, but may not allow much more than 24 psi (guestimate)

all depends on what your motor/turbo combination is

Hi,

I am looking at 2 kinds of race fuels, namely VP MSC100 and VP Motorsport 109. Anyone used them before with any inputs? I have spoken to The Brock Shop who have done dyno testing on race fuels and they suggested to me that the VP MSC100 burns better, is more oxygenated n churned out more power on the dyno than the 109 although the 109 has a higher octane level. They have also adviced that the MSC100 protects better than the VP109. Any input and advice would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

VP Motorsport C100 isn't oxygenated and (IMHO) it's MON of 96 is a bit low for good knock control in a high rpm engine.

VP Motorsport 109 is oxygenated and the best of the VP unleaded fuels for drag racing, be aware that it needs good igntion systems. It's MON of 101 is more like what I would want in big power/high rpm RB. Keep in mind that it's SG is low (0.722) so you will need more fuel than the common 0.75 to 0.80 fuels to achieve the same A/F ratios.

:dry: cheers :)

PS; keep in mind that both of the above are nasty on humans, so don't inhale it or spill on yourself.

If i were to mix 20L of VP109 with 40L of BP ultimate fer a track session, is that advisable? With that combination, what kind of specifications of an ignition system do i need? Or would 20L of VP103 and 40L of BP ultimate be better? I'm running approx. 21-22psi of boost in a rb26 with 34 N1s. I've got a pretty rich tune at the moment too.

It's irresponsible of anyone to suggest what your car will handle unless they're reviewing a dyno run. If you're just after some cheap insurance for your engine for a track day, run a couple of bottles of octane booster in a full tank of fuel. You certainly can mix unleaded fuels together with no ill effects but a proper tune is the best insurance you can get.

Yeah i understand that nobody can give me an accurate piece of advice, i've been mixing octane boosters fer track days in the past and the car certainly seems to run much better cuz the last tune was in japan and it definitely feels like the tune in japan was done on higher octane than 98 after reviewing the dyno graphs here, that's why im thinking of giving the racefuel mix a go. Just wondering if its safe n whether the car will run properly as i've also been adviced that race fuels mixed with BP ultimate is a better alternative to octane boosters as octane boosters are not that good fer the engine. I'm not too inclined with knowledge on racefuels n am just hoping to get some sort of advice. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...