Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My friends wants to turbocharge his 1600cc VW engine.

I want to use a R32 standard turbo as i can use my old dump pipe, etc, etc.

The tricky part of the conversion is, the carby needs to be located prior to inlet of turbo.

As it needs to be a suck through system. So the Dynamic seal inside the R32 turbo would need

to be changed to a Carbon seal so that fuel can pass through the turbo.

What would happen if a ran a setup with a pod on the inlet and a SU carby prior to inlet manifold,

will this work so that i can leave the turbo seal alone?

Someone has said that the increase of pressure may cause the SU to run incorrectly....

Edited by lows_13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162317-r32-turbo-onto-1600cc-vw-motor/
Share on other sites

Carburetted turbo setups are not nice but anyhow .

You mentioned a "Blow Through" system which means the turbocharger literally blowing air through the carburettor and into the engine .

When the carburettor is on the atmosphere side of the turbocharger (upstream) is is said to be suckthrough . Actually the term is nonsensical because the turbo can't "suck" , it can create a depression or area of lower pressure before the carburettor and then its up to the atmosphere to "push" the air through .

Both systems are poor because .

1) Blow through : The whole carburettor/s need to be enclosed in a box so that positive pressure doesn't blow air out of every orifice the carby has ie throttle plate shaft/s . You have to pressurise the float bowl/s otherwise positive pressure blows fuel out the jets rather than the air stream drawing fuel in through the venturis . According to David Visard you need to put rings inside the throats of an open choke carburettor in an attempt to make it boost sensative . Different situation with constant depression carbs like SU's or CD Strombergs .

Provided you get on top of all these issues its usually the better method . You don't have to bother with a carbon or dynamic (mechanical face seal) doing it this way provided the air filter has no noticable pressure drop .

2)"Suck Through" : This really is a crude read shitty system . The carburettor is upstream of the turbo so from its point of view it just has what it thinks is a larger engine drawing on it . It all gets bad because the throttle mechanism is upstream of the compressor housing so this see's lower than atmospheric pressure , lower pressure than is inside the turbos bearing housing so it tends to draw its lube oil out through the compressor end seal - if its a labirinth or piston ring type seal . Horror no 2 is that all of the engines air and fuel goes through the compressors housing and into the inlet manifold . Its all full of fuel vapor (wet systemn) so when you close the throttle its impossible to stop the engine running filthy rich on the over run . No3 , you have to then feed lots of fuel back in when you open the throttle in an attemp to get around the lean or flat spot . Very poor mixture control is the result . Single carb inlet manifolds are usually very crude and even then stupid things like overly rich mixtures are needed to cater for the worst fed cylinder . 4 Shoud the engine spit back or backfire there's lots of fuel and air in the inlet system and you can guess the result .

Really either system is only good for mild performance increases and don't get anywhere near the result of blow through multipoint EFI . You would have to rate very crudly made inlet manifolds with the cheapest nastiest EFI system available as lightyears ahead of carburetted turbocharger systems . The fact that the conversion is going on an NA engine is a worry because they are very easily damaged in a boosted environment .

My advise is don't do it , it will not be cheap/easy/effective so IMO not worth the effort .

Your call .

If you are ingenious and cluey enough to put a turbo on a v-dub engine, then u are ingenious and cluey enough to build an efi system for it. It will be more reliable, smoother and easier to tune and less likely to be a grenade waiting to explode. Upon my internet browsing I stumbled across www.megasquirt.info which is about a DIY efi project which seems cheap enough to set up if you're that way inclined. My last car before my r33 gtst was a 63 bug, and even with a stock engine it had pinging problems. So I suspect something would have to be done about the compression ratio.

Installing EFI is a option we have considered, we've yet to work out a rough cost though.

I'd imagine it would be at least $1000 +

I plan on making the turbo setup and running it, if the compression needs to be lowered

we have another motor we can re-build with lower compression

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...