Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys

i need to make up a pipe bend that will run from my stock intercooler pipe to the far side of the core of my cooler. Like the blitz cooler kits, where the pipe runs back under the core to stock pipes.

However i need to make up a template of the bend that will run from the stock pipe to underneath the core (only need to make the part that bends from the stock coolerpipe to under the core) to give to my metal man that will make this custom pipe for me. His a mate and rather him having the car, he would prefer me to make the template up first, so then he just has to make the pipe from the real thing.

i was going to use that flexi pipe stuff, i think that will do the trick as i dont need to do any hardcore bends, and there more curves rather then bends.

However i thought id ask the experts for advice, so if there is something better i can use let me no.

im open for suggestions

Cheers

Edited by Ricos
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162367-need-to-make-a-pipe-template/
Share on other sites

well....I'm no expert, but this is how we did the roll cage

the template is a flat sheet (we used that stuff real estate agents use for signs)

cut the edge in the shape of the bend (inner diameter)

then they basically chuck the pipe in the mandrel bender and bend until it touches the edge of the template.

easy!

3mm mild steel solid bend with hand or vise to size,then bend pipe to template. or 0.8mm welding wire bend to size then tranfer to cardboard. I work in a pipe bending joint and this is how we do it cant go wrong.

Edited by cruzin33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...