Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

i have an rb20 with the following mods:

-turboback exhaust (Hiflow cat)

-Pod filter

-turbotech boost controller at .7bar

-SAFC

i had the SAFC installed by a mate but i dont have an airflow guage to tell

me weather its running rich or lean. The settings at the moment are as standard

but i was just wondering if someone could post there settings up because i will be

getting a tune in the next couple weeks.

cheers adrian...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/
Share on other sites

dude get a AFM gauge and get it tuned .. On the forum I think someones flogging one for $20 .. Will let you know exactly how its running all the time.. and then you can also make sure the pro is right ..

and off course update every time you get a new part :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/#findComment-3023801
Share on other sites

you need to be careful with the air fuel ratio guages as most of then are not wide band, to be able to see what your car is actually doing in terms of air/fuel ratio you need a wide band sensor in the exhaust and a guage that can read this, the standard o2 sensor in your car is not a wide band sensor,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/#findComment-3024096
Share on other sites

so your saying i shouldve paid 600 for a dr drift remap.

im better off buying a pfc arnt i.

At the moment im not up for massive gains just yet so ill see how it all goes.

PFC are about 1000 bucks plus there is install, tune etc. Im not quite sure about power gains for a safc but is should be noticeable. I still have not got around to getting mine tuned yet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/#findComment-3026400
Share on other sites

the reason y i bought one was because it was hesitating and it missfired so i was

told to get an SAFC. after gapping pluygs at .8mm everything seems well.

i had a read on a few threads on here about tuning the safc n most ppl say they gain anywhere between 13 and 25rwkw with the correct tune.

the more the better i guess

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/#findComment-3026424
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well i got my safc tuned 2day and this is what came up:

Mods:

-turboback exhaust with hiflow cat

-pod filter

-turbotech boost controller at 10psi

-SAFC

Before:

max power: 130.1rwkw @ 6324 RPM

max torque: 506.7Nm @ 5497 RPM

max M.A.P kPa: 179.9kPa @4141 RPM

After:

max power: 137.2rwkw @6344 RPM

max torque: 538 Nm @5082 RPM

max M.A.P kPa: 177.7kPa @3792 RPM

he said that i gained 7 rwkw just from the SAFC and without touchin the boost

for safe reasons. He didnt want 2 up the boost because i still had the factory cooler.

Would u guys say that this was a successful tune or not?

also....

if i decide to get a FMIC and up the boost will i need another tune or will it be ok?

cheers guys...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162899-safc-settings/#findComment-3049556
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...