Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi. I have heard of some tinkering with the crank angle sensor and advancing their timing to get a a bit more power.

I've never had the privilege of doing this myself and just wanted to know what the affects would be on doing so with the stocko computer, power, torque, economy, running quality etc.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163026-advancing-timing/
Share on other sites

Retarding the ex timing after mods ie. turbo, hi-flowing exhaust etc can give noticeable gains in all the categories mentioned by you. Advancing ex timing will make less power, torque, response etc. but also make the motor less prone to detonation. If your car is stock it's not worth touching full stop, if your car is modified an adjustable cam gear and tune is a far better idea than DIY CAS adjustment and hope for the best.

Retarding the ex timing after mods ie. turbo, hi-flowing exhaust etc can give noticeable gains in all the categories mentioned by you. Advancing ex timing will make less power, torque, response etc. but also make the motor less prone to detonation.

that's weird cause in the missus pulsar i advanced the timing from 15 degrees to 19 degrees and it went much better. the problem with retarding the timing is that by the time the fuel has finished burning it may be past TDC. as the fuel burnst it expands, so by advancing the timing you have more fuel burnt by TDC. this however means that the pressure inside the chamber is higher, so the temp is higher (as well as a higher temp from more fuel being burnt). then when it next puts fuel in the chamber temp is higher, so it is closer to pre ignition.

if you retard the timing less fuel gets burnt under high pressure, so there is less heat. while the fuel is unburnt it keeps the chamber cool.

i've done it. advanced it about 5/6 degrees. went much better. i just took it to the point of pinging, then came back a touch. helps build revs faster. you just have to make sure you run the best fuel you can, and always run that fuel.

How can you tell how many degrees your dialing in?

Retarding the ex timing after mods ie. turbo, hi-flowing exhaust etc can give noticeable gains in all the categories mentioned by you. Advancing ex timing will make less power, torque, response etc. but also make the motor less prone to detonation. If your car is stock it's not worth touching full stop, if your car is modified an adjustable cam gear and tune is a far better idea than DIY CAS adjustment and hope for the best.

Don't you mean more power and more prone to detonation etc etc?

most of the people out there that say that 200rwkw from a stock ecu/turbo rb25 are probably running stock timing. there are also other things you can do to get more power, but i can't tell you, otherwise i'd have to kill you.

hahaha is that so? You can't kill the unkillable cos i'm invincible.....I think.

that's weird cause in the missus pulsar i advanced the timing from 15 degrees to 19 degrees and it went much better. the problem with retarding the timing is that by the time the fuel has finished burning it may be past TDC. as the fuel burnst it expands, so by advancing the timing you have more fuel burnt by TDC. this however means that the pressure inside the chamber is higher, so the temp is higher (as well as a higher temp from more fuel being burnt). then when it next puts fuel in the chamber temp is higher, so it is closer to pre ignition.

if you retard the timing less fuel gets burnt under high pressure, so there is less heat. while the fuel is unburnt it keeps the chamber cool.

Whats TDC?

Shouldn't it be that when its running leaner it runs hotter?

Don't you mean more power and more prone to detonation etc etc?

Nope, you guys got it the wrong way around.

Have a read of previous threads on retarding exhaust cam. Plenty of information about it and you don't even have to start a new thread.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...stable+cam+gear

Retarding the ex timing after mods ie. turbo, hi-flowing exhaust etc can give noticeable gains in all the categories mentioned by you. Advancing ex timing will make less power, torque, response etc. but also make the motor less prone to detonation. If your car is stock it's not worth touching full stop, if your car is modified an adjustable cam gear and tune is a far better idea than DIY CAS adjustment and hope for the best.

Wouldn't advancing the cam give you more torque and quicker spool time? As advancing the cam allows the valves to stay open longer, hence more fuel and air can get into the combustion chamber, and also, it allows exhaust gases more time to escape from the cylinder, leading to better breathing abilities, hence more power and less heat generation?

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

Advancing the the ex cam makes the valves open earlier, not stay open longer because the duration the valves are open is dependent on the profile of the cam and that does not change.

A quote from somewhere:

'Where the turbo engine will gain most from cam gears is by retarding the exhaust cam shaft. Normally manafactures like to advance the cam more than optimum for peak power because their highly restictive exhaust manifolds and systems can force hot gases back into the cylinder, promoting detonation.

Start retarding the exhaust cam a couple degrees at a time and watch the power climb, particularly if the engine has a larger exhaust housing on the turbo or an extremely low-restriction exhaust system.'

Funny, in the VL, retarding the cam one tooth and 8 degrees made a massive difference for power when included with even minor mods. About 92kw stock at the wheels, with K&N air filter, twin hyclones, performance extractors, 2.5 exhaust/hi flow cat and an ecu remap, power jumped to an unbelievable 128kw at the wheels. Nothing amazing for Skylines but it made a world of difference for the VL, completely different car to drive... It looks here as if the opposite is true...

Adjusting cam timing = off topic.

Adjusting Ignition timing = ON topic.

Thanks cubes :)

Ok so just to clarify if I'm correct, Looking the engine from the front and turning the CAS:

Advance =anticlockwise

Retard =clockwise

And only adjust the timing while the car is running?

After adjustment put it under load in 5th and check it doesn't ping?

If I'm correct only advance it about 4-5 degrees. Should that be a safe amount running BP Ultimate fuel?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...