Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I got mine from Tilbrooks here in Adelaide 0882618619, Mick who used to be with sub zero is making them. Not sure on prices but they look dam impresive, mine has also got a xf 90mm throttle body.

Guest drift_me_silly

Mattr, pls post a pic when u can.....is is similar to the brain plenum?...my one and only reservation with locally custom made plenums is that they're more often than not a one-off, not a flow benched many time reconfigured item...having said that, i'd still lean towards a local than pay for an imported plenum...

Predator, less piping is great for response, don't get me wrong...but factory plenums have so much reasearch, they're unbeatable....newayz...

Hi guys, I still worry about the distribution inside a lot of the aftermarket plenums (that includes the Greddy ones). The standard RB20/RB25 inlet manifold has a lot going for it.

Heat soak is not really a performance disadvantage as the air spends so little time in the manifold and at such hi velocity it does not absorb any heat from the manifold. Pipe length is really the only disadvantage.

We use the Gibson R31 GTSR design of pipework, with the 1 X 120 degree bend rather than the 3 X 90 degree bends. Cuts down the pipe length a lot and still gives the good distribution and long runners of the standard manifold.

I have seen too many poor flow bench results for aftermarket inlet manifolds to trust them without a copy of a certified flow bench test attached.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Sydneykid, I have the Greddy one and have found a substantial gain in the mid-range just by adding it, plus at high rpm it doesn't fall off power as quick. Can't say what the distribution to each cylinder is like though.

Originally posted by meggala

ican get these for around 600 650

plenium1.jpg

Meggala? are u serious i mean WTF is that?

people would prob want there engine bay to look factory, not a scrap metal yard. I think i could do better with a welder and some sheet bay, i mean how much R&D went into that!

The factory unit is good in its design. It could be improved by a tapered connection to the throttle body and a little more volume.

Here is where you get swings and roundabouts. shorter, straighter path to plenum Vs more even distribution into the cylinder head.

If you can have your cake and eat it thats fantastic. But I'd lean towards a better design of plenum giving you more power and torque benifits over shorter pipe work (within reason). There is substancial turbulence in the plenum and creating smoother and even airflow to each runner is as much art and luck as it is physics. Therefore substancial research would be required to get the plenum working 'plumb'.

If there is clear evidence of development behind the plenum then its worth a shot, otherwise you are spending good money on a placebo.

I've heard some very good things about the trust unit. The only problem people have is putting too big a throttle body on it for the flow of the turbo.

Originally posted by judd

Meggala? are u serious i mean WTF is that?

people would prob want there engine bay to look factory, not a scrap metal yard. I think i could do better with a welder and some sheet metal

:confused:

Why the attack? No need to be so narky about it is there?

Yes it looks crude. I still don't see a need to attack him over it. :headspin:

I like that plenum.....

tell everyone you made it yourself if you think it looks dodgy, then they'll be impressed. And who cares what the hell anything looks like, as long as it goes fast

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...