Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have just recently purchased an R33 skyline GTSt (S1) and this is a photo of the engine bay:

DualBov.jpg

As you can see, I have circled what appears to be the aftermark bov in the left of the picture which is on a welded on flange on the return pipe, but on the RHS of the pic is that the stock unit as well?

ie. is my car running a dual bov setup? Why would someone have done this?

The reason I ask is, I dont like the aftermarket bov venting to atmosphere, as its a defect waiting to happen, and I dont like the PPSSSHHTT either LOL.

SO can I replace the return pipe from the cooler with the factory item to remove the BOV and the factory one will still perform its job?

Cheers for the help, new the the turbo stuff :)

PS I searched but was unable to find an answer as to why this would have been done, or if I could remove it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164876-aftermarket-bov-with-factory-bov/
Share on other sites

I am wondering the same thing, yes that is a dual BOV setup with the stock one but how does this affect anything if the stock one is still doing its job and you have to tighten up the second one all the way so its useless?

I have a Blitz SS one (ultra cool lol) and i want to use it as my standard one but I think this would mean I would have the idle problems once more...

There should not be an issue for you to use the stock one if you want to get rid of your aftermarket one but you must know in terms of boosting your turbo, the stock bov has its limitations and there is a few ways to get rid of this limitation in the DIY section.

Thanks for the reply Pauly. I won't be boosting the car any time soon. At the moment it only has a cat back exhaust and mushroom pod, stock IC. So my intention is to finish off the exhaust and then maybe look at boost later. I just hate the ATMO BOV, so if I replace the pipe with a piece of factory pipe, all will be good?

Cheers!

i know this guy that had the same setup as u

he said the only reason y he chose to have the stock bov and atom is because the stock one eliminated the stalling problems and the wanted the atom one for the noise only

but on ur car do u have any stalling problems?

thats what I had, now I got only stock, but i want the atmo one where the stock one is... this requires an adapter, and an AFC to tune the idle properly... otherwise have fun stalling..

look in the "BOV LEGALS" thread in this forum, that adz started, i give a bit of example of what can happen if u dc the stock to run just an atmo with a stock ecu... its dangerous shit.

it's probably just been left there to plug up the hole.. really the only time you're actually going to stall the engine with a venting BOV is if you build boost, lift off the accelerator in turn venting any compressed intake charge then push and hold the clutch in (if you were changing gears then you would effectivly be clutch starting the engine without even noticing).. this doesn't actually happen all that often so it's not as bigger issue as what you're making it out to be and i also don't see how this is dangerous for the engine? the engine is stalling because it's running rich, if the engine was stalling because it was running lean then yes, you may have problems.. correct me if i'm wrong

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...