Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Where does the clean air come from? PCV is to remove the blow by from the crank case, so it only takes the air (burnt gases from the pistons) out of the crank case that shouldnt be there, not put fresh air in there.

As I explained in previous posts, before emissions laws, PCV just went to the rocker cover and then to atmo throught the oil filler cap, at no stage was the vacuum in the plenum used to clear the gasses, but it did have a one way valve so that air could flow from the crank case to the rocker cover only - thus I believe where the word positive comes from in PCV.

Recirulating these gasses can in no way actually be good for combustion or perfromance, I am sure that companies these days wouldnt plumb these potenially harmful (to the turbo/intercooler/combustion process) back unless only to appease the greenies/govt of this world.

The idea of putting all these gases through some sort of filtration before returning it for combustion, has merit IMHO.

The PCV valve is after the TB, where there is strong vacuum, the gasses will be SUCKED out and fresh air will be sucked in from those 2 hoses on the rocker cover after it has been filtered and metered by the AFM. You could do away with the PCV valve and direct the hoses into the intake and all the fumes would be burnt in the engine anyway.

Yes, recuculating the gas is not good for performace, but it is good for emmissions. That is why it is done (like I said you dont need a PCV system to get the gasses back into the engine).

When you accelerate the manifald vacuum decresses and the PCV valve closes, the gasses then get PUSHED through the rocker cover hoses and go in to the intake, fesh air replaces the fumes.

My system works like stock under closed PCV valve conditions (plus filtering) , but when you put your foot down no crap is sucked back into the engine. So it only sucks in fumes under light throttle when fumes won't make your car ping and the power loss from burning blowby is not an issue. You still get the benefit of positive crankcase ventilation and the benefit of not sucking crap when you are accelerating hard.

At one point I had both lines from my catch can attached to each of the rocker covers. The covers were joined by the U-shaped hose. The catch can was the attached to the intake before the turbo. I blocked the intake plenum.

I'm not sure if there two are related, but I have blown out some of the silastic between the block and the sump - oil leaks now.

Was blocking the plenum and leaving the fumes to find their own way to the can the cause of this?

I see what you mean about the fresh air, but really I dont think it helps the crank case, probably just helps thin the fumes when they enter the plenum.

Postitive Crankcase Ventilation does not require vacuum from the plenum, nor fresh air from the intake - it is purely the removal of the gases from the crankcase. They go out all on their own due to the pressure of more gas entering the crankcase every time a cylinder fires.

If you want a system that works like stock with filtration under boost, and stock type recirculation whilst at light throttle - just fit a catch can - thats what they do.

I just dont understand the point you are making, it sounds to me like you are trying to re-invent the wheel:)

Man, why do you think they put a valve behind the TB where there is vacuum? Like I said for the 5th time, you don't need a PCV system to get rid of the gas. The gas will push its way out of the hoses on the rocker cover and enter the engine that way without the PCV system in place.

Understand?

Well, that's the problem. If they pop the bonnet, that's the first thing they're gonna see. If I can have an unobtrusive can somewhere not immediately visible, it would be a load off my mind.

It doesn't matter if the can is visible as long as it plumbs back to the intake and not to atmo. Basically you just want to filter the blowby before it get's sucked up into the engine again, that's why the debate over blocking the PCV valve, with it in place whenever your not in boost the gases will enter the plenum directly, no filtration. I havn't blocked my PCV valve yet and my catch can is totally clean suggesting that most of the blowby is actually sucked out when not in boost, almost defeats actually having one.

Turbomad, I know that it doesn't matter if the can is visible if it's legal, but if it only has one inlet and no outlet other than the breather, I don't want it to be visible.

Steve, moving the existing breather was something else I contemplated, but I thought I'd rather have something to catch the oil rather than spread it evenly around the interior of my engine bay. Although, I've done around 15000km with that setup and I've never cleaned the engine bay and it doesn't look too filthy, so maybe I don't need the can just yet.

turbomad, does yours plumb back?

What is happening is that the PCV system is still doing its job of sucking air through the crankcase.

****************************************************

Under most conditions air goes IN through the 2 rocker cover hoses not out.

****************************************************

The PCV system SUCKS air through the 2 hoses on light throttle, that is why your catch can is clean. The only time that gas comes out of these 2 hoses is when you boot it. THIS IS A GOOD THING as most of the time crap does not go through all the inlet piping turbo and cooler. (do an experiment, disconnect the the pipe that goes to the intake and put your finger over it you will see for yourself that it sucks and does not blow) The gasses will not have any meaningfull adverse effects to the engine under light throttle. They will just be burned up. We all want performance right? Then the aim is to stop any crap going in the engine under heavy throttle when it actually matters, and to stop residue clogging the intercooler etc.

When you boot it the PCV valve will close and the blowby will then PUSH its way through the other 2 hoses, if you have a plumb back the fumes will be filtered by the can before they go back into the intake. If you have an atmo the fumes will escape into the air. So what matters is most is being achived, ie no crap going into the engine under heavy throttle. Under light throttle the fumes will go into the plenum unfiltered (which does not realy matter anyway as its only on light throttle, and no fumes go through the inlet trackt and intercooler etc)

In most of the plumb back systems meantioned in this thread, closing off the PCV valve defeats the overall purpose of fitting a catch can in the first place. Sure, when you do it your catch can will actually do something under light throttle and not just heavy throttle, BUT... All the fumes will be forced to travel along the whole intake track AT ALL TIMES not just heavy throttle. The fumes will go through all the pipes, turbo and cooler all the time, you might want to kid yourself that there is no oil left in the gas after the catch can but there will always be some crap left in it. It WILL build up in the cooler over time.

Is it starting to make sense yet?

I'm not even going to get into the possble idle probs and vaccum leaks some of the mentioned systems can cause.

The system I drew up takes all of this into accout (when done in plumb back style, see attached text). Under light throttle the air is sucked through the 2 pipes and crank case, goes through the catch can and in to the plenum and not through the intercooler and turbo!! Most of the systems discribed in this thead don't filter the gas under light throttle when it is being sucked through the PCV valve but mine does. Plus the system has the bonus of active crank case fume scavenging under light throttle (unlike the system of disconnecting the PCV valve where gasses must pass through the cooler and turbo at all times). If your are sceptical about the PVC stytems use (even though I debunked the misconsptions 5 times) you can think of it as an added bonus!! Under heavy throttle only, the filtered fumes will go back into the intake. It won't effect the idle because the PCV system still works like stock, only filtered. It also won't effect the idle when used it atmo mode because, there is no parralell path for unmetered air to go into the plenum, ie getting sucked in through the catch can filter. Also when the system is used in atmo mode, the only time gas escapes to the air is under heavy throttle, this will stop the filter clogging and is much better for the environment.

I'm just trying to make the point clear, so you can all decide what is the best, but for people to decide, they first have to understand what is happening. It just seems like a lot of you don't understand the opperation of standard and modified systems (not picking on anyone inparticular) My overall point is to try and explain how the various systems work so you you can decide the pros and cons of each for yourself. I am just trying to make people understand how my system works, as it seemed it was being dismissed without being understood first :P

Any questions?

Fair enough. As long as you realise what will happen when you block it off, and you are fine with the idea that you won't have positve crankcase ventilation and all the gasses will pass through your turbo and intercooler at all times, as oppesed to only under heavy throttle.

Sure they will be filtered, but whats better? (remembering that the can can't filter all the fumes)

(a) Having crank case gasses go through the whole intake tract, turbo and intercooler 100% of the time, with no positve crank case ventilation.

(B) Having crank case gasses go through the whole intake tract, turbo and intercooler maybe, say 2% of the time while still having the positive crank case ventilation (Hell, if you do it my way even the PCV gasses are filtered).

Its your call, I know what has the worse potentinal of clogging the intercooler over time. If you don't belive in the benefits of positve crank case ventilation to prevent corrosive reactions in the oil, just think of it as a way to drastically minimise the amount of fumes that can potentially clog the intercooler.

:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...