Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's what I built the site in my signature for. It's not 100% accurate but it gives an indication of the differences in response and top end. I already uploaded my tuning graph from a few weeks ago so it would be good to see yours, MII32 (I think? sorry I didn't catch your name) and mine.

I haven't taken photos of my dyno graph yet, my camera's stuffed so have to borrow a cam from my mate first. I will have a look at the site u built on dyno graphing comparison~~ MII32? LoL i only have normal plates mate, name's Jyo, with the white gtr32.

I haven't taken photos of my dyno graph yet, my camera's stuffed so have to borrow a cam from my mate first. I will have a look at the site u built on dyno graphing comparison~~ MII32? LoL i only have normal plates mate, name's Jyo, with the white gtr32.

Yeah, I know, I meant you, me and MII32 but I didn't catch his name. When Mark put his graph over mine the curves were very similar except mine came on earlier. Would be interesting to see all three.

Icic willo...no wonder i was a lil confused when i thought u didnt know who i was~~ :whistling: I think the "MII32" u r referring to is "DT GTR"(SA plate). That's Danh, his forumname here is 9krpm. Yeah it would be interesting to put all the curves with different twin setups together. That said, u guys whipped me by 40hp @ 4 wheels! I think i need to move on from poncams to procams, have a re-tune and get 6/4 brakes. LoL. But awesome results on yer 2530s mate~

Icic willo...no wonder i was a lil confused when i thought u didnt know who i was~~ :whistling: I think the "MII32" u r referring to is "DT GTR"(SA plate). That's Danh, his forumname here is 9krpm. Yeah it would be interesting to put all the curves with different twin setups together. That said, u guys whipped me by 40hp @ 4 wheels! I think i need to move on from poncams to procams, have a re-tune and get 6/4 brakes. LoL. But awesome results on yer 2530s mate~

That's the one. Saw the back end of too many cars on Saturday, they all start looking the same.

You're also running N1s so you'd expect to have less top end. I'd imagine your's would come in a lot sooner though. The problem a dyno day is you always come away wanting more. While I'm more than impressed with the 2530s so far some more aggressive cams and another 500-600 rpm to play with would be nice.

Yeah, I know, I meant you, me and MII32 but I didn't catch his name. When Mark put his graph over mine the curves were very similar except mine came on earlier. Would be interesting to see all three.

It was very interesting to see that too. Thanks Mark & Willo.

Your car setup is very nice!!!! What cam, pistons, rods and gearbox have you got in that beast?

I like ur midrange response. I am thinking of selling my engine and build a 2.8 late next year for track work.

Jyo curve has less power than mine at the bottom end as well but he is running more conservative boost compare to us. It's a shame that he is selling the car though. Hopefully it will go to a good home and we get to see it out on the track as often

It was very interesting to see that too. Thanks Mark & Willo.

Your car setup is very nice!!!! What cam, pistons, rods and gearbox have you got in that beast?

I like ur midrange response. I am thinking of selling my engine and build a 2.8 late next year for track work.

Jyo curve has less power than mine at the bottom end as well but he is running more conservative boost compare to us. It's a shame that he is selling the car though. Hopefully it will go to a good home and we get to see it out on the track as often

HKS 264/9.15

CP Pistons 86.5

Crower rods

Standard BNR34 gearbox

I figure if Mark can squeeze 1100+hp out of a RB26 and I was already happy with the response of the 2530s I didn't need to go to the expense of a stroker. I think some bigger cams are in order though so I can lift the rev limit to around 8500rpm and hopefully squeeze some more out of the setup.

Nice work willo. how much boost are you running to get that power?

I've got the same cams and have been reving to 8.5krpm without any problem in the past 2 years. A larger cams might be good for the drag strip but may result in too much lag for the circuit, if not tuned properly. More power in the midrange will help me more on the track.

Nice work willo. how much boost are you running to get that power?

I've got the same cams and have been reving to 8.5krpm without any problem in the past 2 years. A larger cams might be good for the drag strip but may result in too much lag for the circuit, if not tuned properly. More power in the midrange will help me more on the track.

The 500hp run was at 20psi. All the head work done is good for 9000rpm but peak power comes on just before 8000rpm so there wasn't much point pushing it any further.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...