Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Last week i took my non turbo r33 skyline to a mechanics shop to get the timing belt changed, spark plugs ,fuel injectors the lot done.

i handed the car over on wednesday and the mechanic said it would be ready by thursday,come thursday not ready..

i go in on friday and theyd done all the work, but the pistons wer not turning properly so i had to leave it over the weekend.

and so today i whent back and the engine is fkd! one of the pistons hit 'somthing' and i need to get a new motor!

basicaly i need advice from anyone who has a clue, the mechanic claims that this happens alot to no.4 and 6 cylinders in skylines, i smell bullshit but i cant argue, i drove it in there no worries and now its rooted, they claim to have checked it all before starting it and then when they started it there was a massive clonk sound , its too much of a coinsidence that it fkd up there and then....

so does anyone know if that actualy is a problem with skylines,or is it the fact that the timing belt wasnt installed properly or what?

so any help from anyone would be very muchly appreaciated!

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/
Share on other sites

i wouldnt be able to give you extremely technical advice on this, but i reckon that is complete shite...

you may be on the ball assuming they havent installed something correctly and have caused the problem, but proving it is another thing hey. Maybe have it towed to another mechanic who works on imports quite regularly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3146679
Share on other sites

hey glog sorry that had to happen to u

i showed a mate of mine and he loves his cars, he says the mechanic didn't instal the timing belt correctly and the piston hit the valve. hes pretty sure thats wats happened judging by what he has read.

hope all goes ends up going well for ya

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3146702
Share on other sites

sorry to hear that this has happened to you mate....from what i can read about it i think its the mechanics fault....i only take my car to trusted import workshops/garages.....where my mates have gone before and a place where they also have a very good repp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3147722
Share on other sites

worst case seek legal advice. im pretty sure you got something to go on. car was fine before service now its dead. maybe get a report from a reputable workshop that can diagnose the problem that it could only have happened due to the work done on it...ie timing belt not installed properly for the 100k service you paid for.

good luck on getting it fixed. hopefully they're decent enough to admit fault and fix your car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3149417
Share on other sites

Try to take your car out of there if pos. Thake it to a workshop you can trust , get them to take the cyl head off and give you a report as to why it happened . Armed with that go to fair trading and see if you can get them to pay for the damage .

At a guess I would say they mistimed the belt and when they tried to start it a piston or 2 hit the valves and bent them .

It's not rocket science, all you have to do is line the cam gears with the marks and at the same time the crank gear with its mark as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3149993
Share on other sites

sounds likie the mechanic did a quick job and didn't line up the cam gears properly... everything needs to be turning at the right time or shit crunches into each other.... that's why the cam gears have markings on them.

the pistons are all the right length etc, and dont just "hit" things without being in the wrong place at the wrong time... that's why they call it a TIMING belt... its made specifically to TIME the pistons!

dont let them near it or at very least be there when the cover is taken off and take a photo, if they marked the belt in any way, which is common, you will be able to see if things dont match up. even if you cant tell a qualified mechanic will be able to tell you

sorry to hear...

i feel your pain, my 33 was hurt from a similar prob... mechanic crossthreaded the tensioner pulley for the cam belt and it broke under load, luckily the belt stayed on! still ran me $882 though!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170385-need-help/#findComment-3152178
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...