Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys en girls

This is my first post i got my liner bout 2 months ago best choice i have ever made. Just wondering if anyone can help me out with a couple things.Can u get a fuse diagram in english from anywhere and im having a problem with my remote central locking wont work i have replaced the battery in the remote unit but still no go is there a fuse for it in the car or could the reciever in the car be stuffed any help would be k thx dudes L8er

  • 1 year later...

HPerboost,

I know its a bit late but just wondering if you ever found a solution to your remote keyless entry problem.... having similar problem with r33. Central locking still works but remote doesnt. I also have replaced the battery and still nuffin.

thanks,

Hey guys en girls

This is my first post i got my liner bout 2 months ago best choice i have ever made. Just wondering if anyone can help me out with a couple things.Can u get a fuse diagram in english from anywhere and im having a problem with my remote central locking wont work i have replaced the battery in the remote unit but still no go is there a fuse for it in the car or could the reciever in the car be stuffed any help would be k thx dudes L8er

  • 4 weeks later...
I know what it is.  the little motor that unlocks the door is stuffed.

Have you had it fixed? If so did an Auto Electrician do it? Would you mind giving me an indication of how much it cost?

My S1 R33 is having same problem. Can unlock/ lock with a key but remote isn't working (although alarm still is thank goodness). Also I think it is only happening with driver's door.

  • 3 weeks later...

no-sorry - I ended up taking the 'line to a place here in Canberra that fits car stereos and alarms. It is called BDL. They replaced the 'central locking motor' and checked out alarm etc to make sure all was okay. Cost me $80. I was rapt. The driver's door only was affected. Passenger side was okay.....

Everything working beautifully now... :D:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...