Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The police can defect a car if they THINK it's unroadworthy. If they happen to think that the tyres are bald they can defect you, even if they are brand new. It's the way the law is set up, the onis is on us to prove that it's roadworthy. Unfortunatly they make it hard for us south australians to do this by not allowing cars to be inspected by local mechanics and making it unsreasonable to get engineers certs. While lots of cars may comply to immisions, we have to have it tested interstate at a large expence. If they want to reduce the amount of cars that are "unroadworthy" due to modifications, they should look at ways to reduce the costs involved get rid of some of the BS red tape and change the laws so they are black ad white, not upto the interperitation of unprofessionals, ie. police officers and ex-bussdrivers(regency inspectors) That way the goal posts will not be shifted depending on the mood of these people. From some of the stories I've heard the ADRs mean nothing to these people, i mean for fk sake, that's what there there for!

Sorry about the rant, but this shi7 gets my blood boiling, if it was anyone but the government they would not be there today. I'm a cnc machinist and do lots of aerospace work, imagine if i started to interperate the standards in my own way, say rock up at work and decide that it would be cool to make those ally parts out of rubber, people would be hurt, dead and I'd be screwed. That's why standards are there, to standardise things, they should not be changed by the person interperating them.

Edited by Race__24
  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

^^ we all know why they dont pick on dunga's and thats cause mr and mrs poor from elizabeth (sorry to all those that arnt poor in lizzy) they wont ever get the defect of there 'shitbox leaking-from-everywhere-possible magna'

where as 100% of all import drivers will do everything withing there power to get a defect off and that means 2 trips to regency

^^ we all know why they dont pick on dunga's and thats cause mr and mrs poor from elizabeth (sorry to all those that arnt poor in lizzy) they wont ever get the defect of there 'shitbox leaking-from-everywhere-possible magna'

Magnas are fine... its them shitbox commies thats leaking shit all over the road, bald tyres from the hektic burnouts, burnt out tail lights, major drift damage, chopped springs and drill holes in the zorst roaring down the street in the middle of the night.

Yep i got defected in my daily driver R32 on sat night. its pretty standard. all i done is lowered it and painted the stock wheels white to try and dress it up a bit. i'm booked in to regency on monday 2nd july at 8am at a cost of $132 plus i need the time off work to get there. I asked why the copper is choosing to defect my car when its pretty stock. its a bit too low big whoop. Would have been nice if they did more to try and find my old R32 that stolen earlier this year. lost a solid $6000 when that car never turned up again.

Funny how i never had any problems when i used to drive my shitty old 120y around.

^^ its not funny more as sad been in the same boat

i did manage to get a 120y panel van eventually defected when the zaust fell off and i was driving it arround with like a chopped coat hanger jammed in it but every now and again it would come apart and well when its hot u dont touch :D

alot like this pic

1979_vb310.jpg

i tested out screamer the other day and i rumbled past a few cop cars and i have an r33... i can just see it tho, as soon as i get my rims the cops start taking interest. its all a bunch of shite.

so in other words they make focus on other cars not just imports, cant really increase randoms stops for imports as they seem to pull every one over at the mo, yes same set up as nsw is needed, we took the ns.com project car over to syd for engineering makes life alot easier :D mmm legal t67 widebody decent sized n offsetted rims :(

my opinion on defecting is just the cops way of trying to control the amount of modified cars on the street! more modified cars would mean more people hooning and risk taking behavior! not everyone does it but there is that fraction of people who've been too heavily influenced by the fast and the furious and shit! but the cops have also lost focus on what the original intent of defecting was, unroadworthy cars!

i tested out screamer the other day and i rumbled past a few cop cars and i have an r33... i can just see it tho, as soon as i get my rims the cops start taking interest. its all a bunch of shite.

your lucky paully cause your screamer leaks like a whore sounds like you have a massive exhaust leak i would becareful if i were you.

As I was on my way to work the other day I noticed a VL commodore with an entire window missing!!! how can cops miss that and continue pulling over imports that are far far from that condition!!! jealousy???? lol.

Just though i would share my experiences, ive been pulled over at random and defected in my Cefiro, wasnt doing anything out of the ordinary yet i received a defect.

However i used to own a old shit box 1985 colt the had been smashed in the front had no exhaust what so ever yet i would be pulled into a RBT/defect station and they would just let me go. I also own a daily driver 1985 magna that i sprayed gloss black to cover the rust and crappy paint, has no roof lining, dents everywhere from me jumping on it and blows alot of smoke if its low on its "sigma syrup" (read: 3lt of Moreys oil honey and 1lt of 40-70 oil) yet police turn a blind eye, im my mind the police seem very biased as to what they defect, but thats just my opinion.

IF your car is modified and you are worried of getting defected you can get an engineers report that says it is safe and meets nec standards (after a few tests that support this, eg brake tests if extra kws etc). Price of report dep on how many mods it has...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...