Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Ill give you the story:

Good mate of mine has a 33GTR with twin N1 turbo’s, cams exhaust, full rebuild etc…. got approx 260RWKW’s on a very reputable workshops dyno. This is with a standard computer on 14psi

He has just gotten his car back after having the head reco’d due to a cracked gallery?? And also got a PowerFC installed and turned. All other components are the same.

He got 203AWKW @ 12psi with this tune. This again was from a reputable workshop although not the same one as mentioned previously?

We understand that having dyno’d in 4WD compared to RWD will show loss of KW on a graph.

The question is: why would it drop approx 60KW after the head was fixed and a PowerPC has been added to the mix and tuned??

Poor tuning??

Dodgy Job??

From what my mate said the workshop owner advised that the Head was also decompressed??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173720-33gtr-decrease-in-power-after-tune/
Share on other sites

Loss of power directly from these two items

2 psi less

AWKW

General differences

Different Dyno

Different weather conditions, different adjustments for the weather conditions

Yes it could also be a doggy head job, bad tune. Without back to back testing it's very hard to say but the first two things I listed probably contribute the most.

Hi All

Ill give you the story:

Good mate of mine has a 33GTR with twin N1 turbo’s, cams exhaust, full rebuild etc…. got approx 260RWKW’s on a very reputable workshops dyno. This is with a standard computer on 14psi

He has just gotten his car back after having the head reco’d due to a cracked gallery?? And also got a PowerFC installed and turned. All other components are the same.

He got 203AWKW @ 12psi with this tune. This again was from a reputable workshop although not the same one as mentioned previously?

We understand that having dyno’d in 4WD compared to RWD will show loss of KW on a graph.

The question is: why would it drop approx 60KW after the head was fixed and a PowerPC has been added to the mix and tuned??

Poor tuning??

Dodgy Job??

From what my mate said the workshop owner advised that the Head was also decompressed??

maybe it was running out of fuel and the tuner backed it off a little earlier in the rev range, or took a lot of timing out cause it was detonating.

There are too many factors

The questions is.....how does it feel to drive now, compared to before?

If it feels just as good or better then theres no problem

well personally it seems to be less "break ya neck" than prior then again i havent been in the car for approx 2 months and its been off the road for about 1 month.

the current dyno run with the tune was done 2 days ago at about 7pm..... nice a cool (freezing) night

the previous run was done about november 2006 from what he said the day was nice but not cold

100% agree with 2psi less and 4wd compared to rwd dyno but you would think that which a tune and fixed head it would have compensated for that??

i just confirmed with him that the tuner told him that the head had been cracked for a while and should have been picked up whilst the previous workshop had it.

November was the time cams, turbos and rebuild was done then dyno'd.

this afternoon i strongly suggested that he take it back to the shop and have them take a look but on the way there his tyre blew due to random screw.

well see what the shop says tomorrow

Power seems a little low, stock turbos you can get about 250rwkw on 14psi, N1's i'd expect a bit more with a bit more boost.... my old setup had 258rwkw and about 240awkw to give you some idea..

something isn't right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...