Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was at autobarn today and i dont know if this guy was spinning crap to me but he told me that

the only different and the rb25de and rb25det is nothing since that didnt want to waiste money on changing internals he said the only thing i need to change on my rb25de engine is the decompression plate and the head gasket and then i can add a turbo and get an ecu and get it tuned? is he correct or is he spinning shit to try and look good?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174021-na-engine-same-internals/
Share on other sites

yes its true just high comp and no piston squirters is the only difference

I know of one 33 NA 25 make 265rwkw on 12psi wt hks 2535

without a different h/g

so depending on your needs your current motor may be fine

Edited by 1400r
yes its true just high comp and no piston squirters is the only difference

I know of one 33 NA 25 make 265rwkw on 12psi wt hks 2535

without a different h/g

so depending on your needs your current motor may be fine

what do u mean are u saying i can gain decent kw gain from other addons and just keep it a n/a engine?

i wouldnt mind leaving it n/a if i had some decent power

yeh no

turboing your current motor may be fine for your power goals

i have a turbo and everything i need right now except for the ecu and the decompression stuff.

can u name everything i would need to change it over internal wise... is it just called a decompression kit ?

and i have a turbo that runs 15psi on the lowest setting.

im pretty sure this is what its called. it has a nissan rb25 turbo front housing with a garret gt30 front comp wheel with a ar63 or 62 rear housing.. my mate had it on his drift car he said its a 500hp turbo does that sound correct?

hello could anyone here please tell me what it is i need as i heard i only need this decompression plate?

would it be better with a better head gasket aswell?

and could u please give me the name of what plate/hg i would need or even a site for it would be better

and whats the piston squirters 1400r was talking about

Edited by Spartann

just go a larger head gasket

to obtain atleast the same comp ratio as a factory turbo motor or less

and get that turbo running less boost 12 psi is probably max you would want to run

ps theres a NA section on here somewhere with a how to turbo your na 33 would be worth reading that thread

as it would have all your answers

here it is

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=69998

Edited by 1400r
just go a larger head gasket

to obtain atleast the same comp ratio as a factory turbo motor or less

and get that turbo running less boost 12 psi is probably max you would want to run

ps theres a NA section on here somewhere with a how to turbo your na 33 would be worth reading that thread

as it would have all your answers

here it is

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=69998

hi i read the turbo on n/a post but they didnt talk about having the same internals.

they said just leave the compression ratio which i dont want to do. if i just change the head gasket would the engine be able to withstand 15psi? or would i need to upgrade to forged pistons?

hi i read the turbo on n/a post but they didnt talk about having the same internals.

they said just leave the compression ratio which i dont want to do. if i just change the head gasket would the engine be able to withstand 15psi? or would i need to upgrade to forged pistons?

the std internals will cope with 15psi.... depends on your tuner as to how long it will last.

  • 2 weeks later...

mine was orginally a na but I converted to turbo just changed the motor apparently alot is different cams, pistons most of which are made for forced induction which are also stronger also your gunna need a different fuel pump if ya gunna b running high boost, the na gearbox wont handle the torque neither the brakes which are alot smaller if you intent to stop and the diff is made for top end the turbo model is for better acceleration you's may think i dont know but ive been there!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...