Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

103-0365_IMG.jpg

103-0364_IMG.jpg

103-0362_IMG.jpg

103-0349_IMG.jpg

Hello guys. I'm pretty new in posting here but I have been a constant browser of this forum. Here are some pics of my car. The engine is pretty much stock, RB24s and I will be swapping it out with the engine I got awhile back. I will post more pics of it as I do my car. Thank you.

Edited by CEF
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175140-a31-from-the-philippines/
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your comment. :thumbsup:

The wheels are 17" Work Rezax, 8" for the front and 9" for the back. Offset is +35 front and +47 rear. The offset is pretty good and the wheels are almost sticking out of the fenders. The car just needs to be lowered a little so as to lessen the gap between the fenders and tires but that will be done after I get all the parts from an r32 I ordered in Japan. It comes with all the goodies that I can put on the car. I'll take pics of the parts as they arrive with me.

  • 2 months later...
NOTE THE PASSENGER SIDE AIR VENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what about it? looks normal to me?

nice clean car... did they come out with those headlights and taillights in phillipines?

And you HAVE to put up pics of the legendard RB24S "carby RB" engine.

Also could you do me a huge favour and check on your headlight if it has the word "DOT" on it? AFAIK almost all cars sold in the phillipines were done to US standards, so that means that the LHD ceffies should have DOT approved headlights and tail lights.

  • 1 month later...

Funkymoney,

Hi.

The headlights were released like that over here though I just installed some foglights in it as I don't like using the projector headlight models. The tailights Ihave on right now is from Japan. The a31's we have here have those horizontal lines across.

Yes, if you want some RB24 engine pics, I'll surely take some before I take them out in the coming weeks.

Headlights...no DOT markings on it. The tailights, I have to check again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...