Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just wondering im lookin at purchasing one of the above for my r33 gtst. The specs of my r33 are fmic, boost controller running 10pis, pod and full exhaust.

Using the above and with one of the for mentioned piggy back systems Im hoping to get around 200kw atw.

JUst wondering which one is best suited? Which ones have you all used? Wat are you experiences? and as far as value for money what the best?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177591-safc-e-manage-or-gizzmo-camfc/
Share on other sites

find some tuners near you or on the forums and see what they prefer and use

they will have good hands on experience using what they know, be sure to cover a few so you dont get a biased opinion.

i dont think the gizmo camfc will do what u want the safc has proven results over and over and should get you 200rwkw without an issue

i think it would be cheaper than the emanage too

lookin at around 500-600 inc tuning for the moment so power fc is out of the question.. I can get an emanage for around 300-400, safc 1 for around 200, and safc 2 for around 200-250, a camfc is around 250 also. SO I reckon 200 for tuning should be enough.

If that is ur budget get a SAFC II, cost about 250 second hand, if u can get it cheaper then all the better. I payed $150 for the tune. Don't know what rwkw the mods u have make in ur car now but they r the same mod I had and I got 20rwkw from a SAFC II tune. If ur pushing 160-170 already then u should get close to 200rwkw but dont be dissapointed if u dont get it lol. I was told to expect 160 rwkw and only got 150, i was dissapointed.

Liam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...