Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry to hijack this thread, but on an aftermarket gauge on idle for rb25 how much vacuum should you see?

and is there anyway you can tell that you have a vacuum leak or a leak of some sort!

hopefully someone can help!

cheers in advance!

Wasn't going to get involved in this one but here goes .

For a start please delete all notions of "negative pressure" and pistons or engines "sucking" . Firstly negative pressure doesn't exist - its as simple as that . You have a total vacuum or zero and everything above that is positive pressure . We have been brought up with this brain dead notion that atmospheric pressure at sea level is zero and anything less - is negative ?

The technical terms are PSI"A" meaning referenced from absolute zero and PSI'G" meaning PSI Gauge pressure referenced from sea level atmospheric ie ~ 14.7 PSI/1000 millibars .

Your Skylines manifold gauge is whats called a compound guage because it measures either side of 1 BAR or 1 barometric which is 1 atmosphere at sea level .

If you look at turbocharger compressor maps you'll generally see a reference on the left hand side of the map and the units used are pressure ratio (PR) . This is because 1 PR = 1 atmosphere = 1 BAR = 14.7 lbs/square inch = 1000 milibars .

The map really only tells us anything useful once the turbo can generate pressure greater than atmospheric and thats why the scale starts at 1 PR .

Start two . Engines can't "suck" . What they can do is generate an area of lower pressure than atmospheric so the atmospheric pressure being higher forces its way into the cylinders - minus any restrictions that hinder its progress . This is the reason why its so important to have low restriction filters and everything else between the atmosphere and the cylinders themselves .

NA competition engines can have high volumetric efficiency built into them but it doesn't fit in with the noise/emissions/power characteristics in road car engines . Supercharged engines (forced induction) can easily get good cylinder filling because they have greater than atmospheric pressure at times in their inlet manifolds so the restrictions down stream of the compressor are less of a problem innitially anyway .

The whole reason to supercharge a piston engine is to get higher torque that the same sized NA engine can develop . These days engines are far more complex than they used to be so turbocharging is not as simple as it once was .

In my mind I think a better measure of forced induced vs NA performance is torque and all engines are different on that score . For example a 4.5L 4 cam Jap V8 may make better overall power than a Holden 5L iron nob but both will be way ahead of your RB25T at lowish revs .

Turbo or mechanical supercharging is not a free ride and they create as many problems as they solve in high performance tune . One of the biggies is that once you get more air and fuel in to make higher cylinder pressures you get a higher volume of exhaust gas to have to deal with - bigger engine exhause flow . In some ways this is the most important aspect to deal with

because even though the engine only operates in a supercharged state some of the time its exhaust tract has to cope with high mass flow all of the time . Its a big ask to drive a healthy sized turbine that won't create unacceptable restrictions and have the engine responsive as well .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...