Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey everyone

who can tell me which turbo to get for a nissan s13 silvia

the motor is a rb26 head with rb30 bottom end (not built yet)

the rb26 cylinder head

*head ported

*in/ex hks 280 degree 10.2 lift camshafts

*jun titanium retainers

*hks valve springs suit camshaft

*standard valves, 3 way valve angle maybee 4?

*tomei solid lifters

*hks metallic gasket kit

*cometic head gasket

*tomei cam cap studs

*arp head studs

*standard throttle bodies and plenum

*hks 1000cc injectors

*hks 11.0mm fuel rail, sard regulator

*hks adjustable cam gears

*hks cast iron low mount

*hks 50mm wastegate

bottom end rb30

*rb26/30 cp pistons

*billet argo rods i beam

*acl race bearings

*arp main studs

*ross balancer tuff bond

*n1 water pump

*jun oil pump, crank collar

*high energy sump 8.5l

i am capping the car at 800hp i doubut i can get it from pump fuel? but want to see the car at the drag strip with race fuel and slicks......just to brag 9's...lol

is the trust t78 better? i hear t04z has little lag

most of my things are hks so i'm leaning towards the t04z.... The cars goning to be a drift car and street drag car

what is the most rwkw's from this turbo

are all rated at 800hp? why get a bigger wheel ar100 if the smaller 1 ar63 is same hp rating?

thanks

josh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178356-hks-t04z-vs-trust-78/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If drifting is your main focus, neither of those turbos will be any good at all.

Too much lag and not enough response, peaky power delivery and poor throttle adjustability (important in a drift car!!!)

A few of the (expensive) parts/mods on your list would be over-kill for an RB30DET built to make a nice, responsive, 450 to 500hp- which would be more than enough in a light drift car like a silvia with the right suspension set-up.

so cap it at 450hp - 500hp

would it have traction for the street?

and turn it up for when acting the fool....lol

is it possible to do this?

That's about the MAX you would want for a street car mate.

Like many have said, if you want a 'good' drift car, you're gonna need a responsive car.

But for which turbo to go ahead with? I would go the HKS T04z because it's newer technology?

yeah i'll get the t04z

i want to convert the silvia to 4wd now

not right away though... i got a 300zx box an rbr26 bellhousing for now

its been done before

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=224266

i'll give it a go... further down the track

thanks ppl

hey

i got a hks cast iron low mount manifold

it has a t04 flange

and for the top it has a td flange 3 bolt for the wastegate instead put a turbo

my point is if i put a smaller trust td..... something (which one should i get)internal gate

and get a garett 3035r 700hp turbo d xr6 turbo also internally gated or smaller turbo?

then the car would spool up quick for drift and the big one would kick in later for drags

let me know ppl

Hoenstly mate, i think you really really need to do a lot more reasearch.

Your ideas sound very up in the air, let alone the budget.

Running a 400rwkw+ car is going to cost you upwards of 20k without even sniffing.

Probably closer to 30-35k by the time you replace everything you break when you try to start using the power

Yeah mate I really think you need to go back and have a look at the basic shit before youre doing what youre talking about doing...

Takes a lot of commitment and huge amount of cash to have a car running an engine like that...

Why do you think you dont see them everywhere? For just that reason, most people dont have the money, dedication, nor want to live with the compromise.

And I assure you, if you think youll be driving 800hp round on the street, there WILL be compromises :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...