Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

y do people continue to street race.....i just dont get it...

Cause you dont have to go to a track, plus its cheap, not everyone can afford to go all the way to friquen towoomba just to have one go around a circuit, plus all the gear and shit u need. Its just easy. I say to fix this, governement should just open a closed airport strip somewhere and you can go race and be an idiot there at ur own risk, that way atleast ull be off the roads.

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cause you dont have to go to a track, plus its cheap, not everyone can afford to go all the way to friquen towoomba just to have one go around a circuit, plus all the gear and shit u need. Its just easy. I say to fix this, governement should just open a closed airport strip somewhere and you can go race and be an idiot there at ur own risk, that way atleast ull be off the roads.

Sorry dude, but by your logic, won't they just skip the closed airport just like they do a designated track?

I think it's got nothing to do with being cheap or easy, but more to do with people just don't get that street racing is dangerous. I think only one of two things can change someones mind when it comes to this, and that is

1. mature and grow out of it

2. unfortunateally be involved or have a loved one involved in a severe accident because of street racing

If both these things have happended to you and you still don't get it, then the quicker you drive off to that big street race track in the sky, the better off the rest of us will be.

As far as gear you need for a circuit, every track i've been to, only asks you have ankle to neck clothing, closed shoes and a helmet (which at someplaces you can hire for $20)

I fully aggree with your there NISMO

immature drivers, go out, watch a movie like Fast and the Furious(which is really quite sh*thouse) then think, wow, let's race some idiot in his hyundai done up and if we crash like they do on the movies, it'll just dent the front bumper.

Next thing they know, they've crashed into someone....thinking they would have the chance to get out the way, I also think most of them have never had an accident before, once you have have one, you'll be worried about your next one that's for sure.

Sorry dude, but by your logic, won't they just skip the closed airport just like they do a designated track?

I think it's got nothing to do with being cheap or easy, but more to do with people just don't get that street racing is dangerous. I think only one of two things can change someones mind when it comes to this, and that is

1. mature and grow out of it

2. unfortunateally be involved or have a loved one involved in a severe accident because of street racing

If both these things have happended to you and you still don't get it, then the quicker you drive off to that big street race track in the sky, the better off the rest of us will be.

As far as gear you need for a circuit, every track i've been to, only asks you have ankle to neck clothing, closed shoes and a helmet (which at someplaces you can hire for $20)

As far as gear you need for a circuit, every track i've been to, only asks you have ankle to neck clothing, closed shoes and a helmet (which at someplaces you can hire for $20)

for me it isn't the cost of the gear, it's the 6 hour drive (3 each way) and the cost of fuel, and then spending all that time and money to get half a dozen runs down the strip. so basically for my it is about $95 and 6 hours driving to do 90 seconds of track time over a 4 hour period at the track. and then they don't have test and tunes every weekend, and i can't go on wednesday nights cause i wouldn't get there till they are just about to finish up, so that would be $95 and 6 hours to possibly not even get a chance to run. if it was just down the road i'd be lining up before they opened and they would have to kick me out at night.

but then i don't go out and try to race every car i see either. i will just fang it a bit every now and then.

but i also have a thing against old drivers that shouldn't be on the road. my mate's dad was killed on a motorbike when an old guy pulled out from an intersection without looking. he wasn't speeding, and never did. he was a fireman and had seen enough accidents to know the outcome. the old guy just didn't look. and i have nearly hit a few old ladies that pull out of the shopping centre carparks onto the road without looking. and when i was a school i saw an old guy drive straight through a stop sign at 40kmh (was in the school zone) and into the path of a bus. luckily the bus was slowing down to turn, but still smashed the car up pretty good. luckily no-one was hurt. and i have been on a bus that an old guy didn't give way to. i was sitting in the middle of the back seat and went flying down the isle. i ended up about 1/2 way down the bus.

Cause you dont have to go to a track, plus its cheap, not everyone can afford to go all the way to friquen towoomba just to have one go around a circuit, plus all the gear and shit u need. Its just easy. I say to fix this, governement should just open a closed airport strip somewhere and you can go race and be an idiot there at ur own risk, that way atleast ull be off the roads.

Circuit in Toowoomba ehh... don't think so buddy. QR is like 30mins from Brisbane.

The clarification on the "tyre exploding" assertion is even stupider:

One witness said the vehicles were driving "flat out", and another reckoned the cars braked so hard before the fatal crash that their "rear tyres exploded", Senior Sergeant Baghurst said.

Yes, because the harder you brake the more the weight shifts to the rear, loading those tyres up even more, and increasing the risk of failure. Forget physics, lets just rely on non-expert eyewitness accounts!

That comment is so implausible it shouldn't have even borne repeating. Typical ratshit sensationalism...

Edited by scathing
Yes, because the harder you brake the more the weight shifts to the rear, loading those tyres up even more, and increasing the risk of failure. Forget physics, lets just rely on non-expert eyewitness accounts!

That comment is so implausible it shouldn't have even borne repeating. Typical ratshit sensationalism...

no you are forgetting the hand brake. i know that whenever i want to stop in a hurry i don't touch the brakes i just reef on the handbrake, cause having 10mm wider tyres on the back, and all the weight on the front tyres works way better then using all 4 tyres and having the bias on the front.

but the cops could simply walk up to the cars and look at the tyres to see if they are flat or not.

but the cops could simply walk up to the cars and look at the tyres to see if they are flat or not.

That sounds like police work, and they were probably too busy looking for uncovered pod filters.

From this pic:

0,,5588336,00.jpg

the tyres look fine on both cars.

That not what Wade Watson said

True, but Wade Watson could also be a retard.

From this article it says he saw the tyres on the silver Commodore blow (the red one was just generating a lot of smoke, suspicious evidence since the VY range should have ABS across the board).

In that photo, the driver's side rear tyre is clearly visible and intact. While the passenger side one is not clearly visible, the car isn't canted to that side.

agreed with scathing... more sensationaliist journo crap. If thats the intersection im thinking it is... I know it very well... its had more head on accidents that any other due to piss poor design... its a long straight run of 3 lanes either side.. highway infact... its like a 80k highway road that becomes 40 durring certain hours becuase of a school within a blocks worth of vicinity. that exact intersection has had more than a few writeoffs and I believe theres been a few fatalities there before also.

due to the vast speed difference from 40kph traffic and 80 kph traffic and the stupid confusion cuased there is always more traffic than there needs to be and the crapness of traffic lights means exhorbitently long waits to turn right. after getting impatient people crack it an try to launch across...

on the corner just to the left is also a petrol station.... this does not help matters with people comeing in and out..

its also a major inlet for a traffic only suburb... not that the road looks like it when you look at it. its as if they hadnt worked out it was a quick way for 1 section of hte suburb to get home that bit quicker so they never upgraded it and walla... more traffic than planned for....

the school is on the right hand side.....

colyton/stclair left st mary's / mtdruit right and antoher 2k's down the road major intersection of queenst/mamre and the highway ?

coppers didnt have to come far.. their station is just before queen st on the other side of the road....

if this is where im thinking it is...

anyone got the location ?

Edited by gts-4 dreamer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...