Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, ive tried searching round for some answers but havent been able to find. The thing is my R33 gtst is going in for a tune and i dont know if i should hold off until i buy a Z32afm or if infact this is a waste of money for my car, my mods are: Bosch 040 fuel pump-adj fuel press regulator, fmic,JJR twin split dump pipe, Gizzmo boost controller, HKS pod filter, blits atm blow off (i may have left some stuff out as im in a hurry) I plan to run it on 11psi all the time. My apexi pwr fc is being tuned when the dyno run/tune is done. I was hoping for at least 220rkw at 11psi and a bit higher on 13psi, my question is will i need to upgrade to a Z32 and if i dont will it affect the tune a little/lot? what should i do? could someone please explain to me the advantage of a Z32 and if i really need it/should get it before the tune, Im not really sure if i will go that much further with the mods on this car as its my daily driver (in saying that i may look at bigger inj and hi flo turbo in the future) please help!, cheers

Damo

if you are on the stock turbo i doubt you are maxing out the afm, so i don't think you would need the z32. however if you plan to upgrade the turbo down the track then you could just get it when you do that, since it would need to be retuned then anyway.

and you will be pushing it to get 220kw with the stock turbo at 13psi, let alone 11psi.

The standard turbo and injectors are your 2 bottle necks at the moment.

You definately won't need the Z32 until you change turbos so save your $300 until then.

But do get your car tuned as it is.

Power FC with those mods should get you around the 200rwkws, not your 220 unless its a happy dyno.

But if you forget the figure (i got 194) and take it for a spin after the tune, trust me, you'll be grinning from ear to ear :unsure:

I got a Q45 AFM + Apexi Power Intake Kit to suit for sale if you want it >_<

You probably wont need it + the power FC already has the voltage ramp table for the Q45 (select VH41 or something like that) so a tune wont be NEEDED but definately RECOMENDED

I was in the same situation as you and took my chances im now pulling 240rwkw on boostworx dyno with the standard afm obviously not standard turbo but id say you should be fine. How ever shaun did say im pretty much on the limits of the Afm and injectors are on the cards. Let us know how you go.

You can pretty much tune anything on the standard AFM, just that you'll hit the top (20th) cell really early and be stuck with whatever that value is for any load point above, say 70%, so you lose resolution

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...