Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I installed a twin plate nismo clutch today (along with new spigot, thrust bearing, and pivot ball)

Problem is that when I engage the clutch pedal, the clutch is not fully disengaging/allowing me to select a gear.

Any answers on what could be causing this?

just used the standard replacement thrust bearing, could that be it?

Definately cant be that the cluch plate is in the wrong way as it only fits one way.

We also noted that the slave cylinder pin was a bit worn... related??

ok i'll reword the above,

Those who have a Nismo twin plate, did you reaplce the bearing only or both the carrier and the bearing? (just a bit confused as the picture above shows the carrier AND bearing)

Thanks :P

Edited by MintR33

nar the carier is the same. but you need to get a back nismo catalogue and see what thickness you need. it is probablyu needs a thinner one. once you get the corect small bearing just see if the clutch fork isnt locked up. it should have abit of play in it.

Ok the 1600 Bearing had an outside diameter of 65.45 with the RB25 72.00 (as best as I can remember) the thickness between them was on .5mm difference.

Would the Diameter be enough to change the pivot point on the pressure plate?

its height not diameter your refering to. height changes the pivot point.

look, just get the little bearing. put it on your sleeve, bolt up the box, and inspect the freeplay. if it has any.

(min of about 5mm-max-15mm) placing the clutch fork in the forward most half of the hole in the gearbox.

  • 14 years later...

Sorry to revive such an old thread, but can anyone confirm the proper carrier that is used for the Nismo plate in a push configuration? The manual makes no mention of using a reduced height bearing carrier, however I’ve heard more than once that a reduced height bearing carrier is needed, I believe one from a Pulsar or Bluebird, don’t recall. The only component that comes with the clutch is a throw out bearing, which is a standard unit. Thanks for the help 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity. Edit: 11kg each (or 10.9/11.1 depending on what my scale decides over multiple tests, the 18x11 don't seem to weigh noticeably any more than 10.5)  
×
×
  • Create New...