Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone had any experience with the HKS twin GT2835's on a GTR? What are your thoughts on these turbos on an RB26. What engine work and cams etc would work well with these turbos? Maximum power made using these turbos (and @what psi)? Best 1/4 mile?

I was thinking of using 280° HKS cams with headwork and bottom end strengthened.

Thanks in advance.

Charlie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17972-gtr-power-using-hks-2835s/
Share on other sites

well I have driven a gtst with rb26 and 2835r's

this vehicle http://www.meggala.com/ther32hot.htm

you get postivie boost from around 3k rpm full boost @ 6k rpm or so first gear was a waste of time when on boost 2nd gear was interesting/scary, third was scary and so was 4th If you can afford a motor to handle these turbo's you will find avery satisfying package the car was running 272 cams I think.

Talk to dr_drift from BMT on here he and his partner are performing work on that car btw it had a hks dogbox or trust one not sure it was a h pattern the nicest box I have used period.

meggala

Hi NXTIME, personally I think 2835's are too big for a 2.6 litre engine. I have found the 2530's to be much better, stronger mid range with almost as good top end and useable power all through the rev range with good throttle response. You may get a higher maximum power with 2835's but the average power over the required rpm range (say 4,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm) will be higher with 2530's.

It all depends on what you intend using the car for. For a road car that does a bit of track work, the 2530's are very hard to beat.

Hope that helps

Thanks for the replies, guys. It will be used for drag and mated with a 6 speed (Trust?) box. Also looking into a stroker kit. What about cams? The head will be upgraded also with valves, springs etc. I like to drive on the street, so it will be used there, but it's main aim is the strip.

meggala, since it will be 4wd, I don't think that the traction will be as big a problem as the gts-t. I have started another post regarding the Trust 6 speed box.

I don't think that the traction will be as big a problem as the gts-t.

enjoy mate you will have traction issues they will be fun dont stress 272 or 280 cams ashuld be good get the heads done as well which I assume you will the gtst was very drivable on the street so dont worry about that the triple plate clutchwas a bit edgy thats all have fun I know you will in a car like that.

people can talk about it but once you drive a car in that type of tune is when you fully appreciacte then. and I am not one for big hp infact I am about restrain but I kept saying to my self that car was scary but you know what is even scaryier is that I could live with it :)

good luck

meggala

hey meggala, how did that thing pass compliance with the external gate up in the bay like that?

all i can say is 2835rs are sweet! everything ive heard and read says that they are the best in hks range for compromise between torque and top end.

if a 2835 is too big for a rb26? then what would you think of it on a rb20 sydneykid?

Munro has done this with a 3L bottom end, I think it made over 900hp, runs mid 9s on street (nitto) rubber. For box, I believe trust boxes dont handle the power too well, hollinger is probably a better choice. If Munro reads this thread I am sure he will reply, but otherwise you could always pm him.

If you can get hold of the back issues of HPI - that is his 3L streeter that is written about.

yeah has always been running but lacks mgt. although off the road for the moment cause was changing the exhaust manifold gasket and found that one of the studs has snapped off and needs to be drilled out. bummer. while its being worked on considering getting adj cam gears put in.

so whats the deal with that car?

Meggala, thanks for the info. Where is this car now and when will it see the dyno and drag strip? Any more info on the Trust gearbox?

Steve, thanks for that, I have heard plenty about the few 9 (and 8) second GTR's down under and am in awe of some of the set ups.

if a 2835 is too big for a rb26? then what would you think of it on a rb20 sydneykid?

hey Aybee

I believe you put 2 on an RB26 and one one an RB20 - i think there is a difference... for a street car, 2835s are too laggy, but if its dragger, then why not...

S of S

i know that you put two on a rb26. but still i dont think that it is too big for an rb20. i bought my car with one and its not too laggy even without the mgt that it so desperately needs. boost gauge starts going positive at around 2900 and gate opens at 4500 hitting 1.1-1.2 bar. i dont think its that bad for street.

Taken from www.exvitermini.com

Current power: Greater than 450kW (~600 BHP) at all four wheels

Engine designation:        Nissan RB26DETT:  2.6 litre, Double overhead cam, Electronic fuel injection, Twin Turbo

Displacement:               2,568cc

Bore x Stroke:              86mm x 73.7mm

Redline:                        Upto 9,000 rpm

Boost:                          Upto 2.2 Kg/cm2

Static compression:      

Camshaft specs:            

Exhaust manifold:           Custom Inconnel extractors, split as 2 banks of 3 cylinders, each feeding one turbocharger and external wastegate

Turbo chargers:           HKS GT-2835R with customised exhaust housings (x2) and custom water cooling modification

Waste gates:                  HKS 58mm external GT wastegates (x2)

Exhaust:                         A'PEXi N1 Dual with custom 3.25" dump pipes from each turbo and wastegate

Intake:                           A'PEXi Power Intake pods (x2)

Intercooler:                    A'PEXi Drag Vmax/SPL

Pressure relief:               A'PEXi Dual chamber blow off valves (x2)

Fuel system:                   HKS fuel rail, HKS fuel pressure regulator, custom 2 litre swirl pot, Bosch Motorsport 500HP fuel pumps (x2), Blitz 700cc injectors (x6)

Cam adjustment:            HKS vernier cam wheels (x2)

Computer:                      A'PEXi Power FC Pro ECU with FC Pro link

Boost control:                 A'PEXi Super AVC-R boost controller

Clutch:                           Nismo twin plate 8.5" with uprated 6,750lbs pressure plate

Drive train:                     Nissan 5 speed standard with uprated Nismo input shaft, Nismo short shift kit

Thats how to do it. As for gearbox Fark off that trust piece of Krap, and go for an OS Giken product (5spd gearset). Its cheaper and wont cause you anywhere near the trouble of the trust which is weak, cant handle any decent power and poorly made. I have seen these time and time again sheer teeth.

Boost response would be even better if you used the JUN 2.7 stroker kit

hahaha ross what a joke you better tell all the guys in japan running 9's and tens with trust boxes they are idiots.

the trust box is a dog box the osgiken is just a stronger gear set and not a dog box. you hav eboviously not driven a trust box have you they are very nice

cheers

Originally posted by meggala

hahaha ross what a joke you better tell all the guys in japan running 9's and tens with trust boxes they are idiots.

the trust box is a dog box the osgiken is just a stronger gear set and not a dog box. you hav eboviously not driven a trust box have you they are very nice

cheers

Then you better tell Munro, Ben @ racepace (Melb), and Garage Active (in Japan running 9's R33 GTR HPI issue #26 page #24)

that their cars arnt that good because they all had a go with the Trust gear box and all stripped teeth. What I said is that they cant handle any DECENT power, and this is only relating to GTR's NOT Gts-t's.

to quote HPI issue #26 page #24:

"Keeping the Trust gearbox in one piece is a different matter. The trust six-speed, while durable in LOW POWER applications, simply cant cut it when placed in a 9 second drag car. It commonly strips gear faces, breaks shafts and generally falls to bits.

Countering this is the great collection of spares that Fonz has in place - we counted six Trust transmissions. He reckons its easier to keep rebuilding them, rather than switch to an "exotic brand" like a Hollinger."

Dog box or not, the trust really is for low power applications, and having a dog box is not the latest or greatest application either. I never stated that I have driven a car with a trust dog box, nor am I an authority on the matter, but I dont believe driving a GTS-T once with one qualifies as an expert either.

Please Megalla correct me again if im wrong, but can you name any other guys in japan running 9's and tens with trust boxes that run them reliably and without multiple and common failures, because I would love to know. Look forward to hearing from you.

Ross

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...