Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After looking at the ignition dwell duty table values. I googled for the conversion from dec to milliseconds, and discovered a few differing methods that yeld some very different results.

firstly there are 32 (RPM) points in the table, some believe that these are in 400 rpm blocks thus going from 400-12800 rpm (seems unlikely). 200 rpm intervals seem more likely eg. 200-6400 rpm.

next the dec values I imagine have a conversion value to convert them to a percentage, two variations on this one.

1. divide by 10

2. multiply by .33

I favor the option 1, but could be wrong.

Now to convert dwell duty percentage into milliseconds.

I used this method (1/(RPM) X 6000) X Duty % (in decimal).

This gives me a peak of around 4 ms at 200 rpm and an average value of around 2 ms for the rest of the table.

Am I on the right track with this one?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180258-z32-igniton-dwell-duty/
Share on other sites

Looking at the Z32 ECU I have tried to come up with a conversion table to ms and came up with zip! I have tried longer dwell on standard coils and had better burn and more torque but prone to detonation and shorter dwell and less prone to detonation but guaranteed way to fry coils.

From what I have gathered there is 2 increments per RPM scale and they seem to differ. by best guess would be use the RPM scale as a guide and devide each increment by 2 for your 32 points.

As for dwell values there was a table somewhere I will have a look and see if i can dig it up. but the results were a bit shady. there was actually a brand of coild called FET. and they gave specifications that indicate they were designed for a min of 2ms and no less.

sorry can't be much help :)

there are numbers of GTR's in japan making 800ps with standard coils so they know something we dont...

high on painkillers right now sorry if my explination is not the best...

Here is a table of values using data at 7B60 tp 7B7F.

200 Rpm - 4.50 ms

400 Rpm - 2.25 ms

600 Rpm - 2.20 ms

800 Rpm - 2.40 ms

1000 Rpm - 2.52 ms

1200 Rpm - 2.60 ms

1400 Rpm - 2.57 ms

1600 Rpm - 2.66 ms

1800 Rpm - 2.70 ms

2000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

2200 Rpm - 2.84 ms

2400 Rpm - 2.90 ms

2600 Rpm - 2.91 ms

2800 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3000 Rpm - 3.02 ms

3200 Rpm - 3.04 ms

3400 Rpm - 3.07 ms

3600 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3800 Rpm - 2.91 ms

4000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

4200 Rpm - 2.83 ms

4400 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4600 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4800 Rpm - 2.85 ms

5000 Rpm - 2.80 ms

5200 Rpm - 2.69 ms

5400 Rpm - 2.59 ms

5600 Rpm - 2.50 ms

5800 Rpm - 2.41 ms

6000 Rpm - 2.33 ms

6200 Rpm - 2.25 ms

6400 Rpm - 2.18 ms

Seems to fit in with CEF11E info on the coils.

Maybe someone has measured dwell in ms at any of these points and can confirm if this correct.

I made it.

Took the values in the igniton dwell duty table, Converted them into dec.

Divided them by 10 (Conversion in to Dwell Duty %).

Then applied this formula ((1/RPM) x 60000) x Dwell Duty % (as decimal).

I scaled each of the addresses as 200 RPM Intervals.

eg. 32 addresses = 200 - 6400 rpm.

EXAMPLE:

Value at 7B60 is 0F or 15 dec.

15/10 = 1.5

((1/200) x 60000) x 0.015

(300) x 0.015 = 4.5 ms.

This is how I got those values in the table, still not sure if it is 100% accurate.

It would be good if someone has measured the dwell time at a few of these points to prove or disprove this method.

The other option of scaling the table in 400 rpm (400-12800 rpm) intervals is still possible, with smaller values.

Somewhere around 1 millisecond lower at a guess.

Just thought i'd add that the reason behind all this is that I plan to use LS1 coils in the future if my Ser 2 coils give out.

I'll probably increase the dwell for these as i've heard that they are a little slow and need around 3-4.5 ms of dwell.

its an iduuctive coil. around 2mh. the norm is the higher the inductance the longer the dwell needed. the longer the better. but the longer it is the more heat is generated in the coil and driver.

generally to get a very good spark around 3-4ms is nominal. 2ms would be at tyhe very bottom of the scale without having to close down the gap.

ive been playing around with differant coil for my cdi set up. and found tha a mitsubishi gto coil pack is no good. cos its got an inductance of 6mh. where as my mazda coil are only 3mh. so they need half the charging time.

you need to workout how many ms are available at full rpm.

I believe that those numbers are too high, when you put those sort of dwell numbers into an aftermarket computer the stock coils burn out, i was under the impression that the stock system runs about 1.7ms

Edited by Adriano

Okay,

TO4GTR - Maximum dwell duty % would be 25.5 %, That would mean that @ 6400 rpm max coil charge time would be 2.38 ms.

Adriano - The RPM Scale that I am using could be either 200 or 400 rpm i'm not sure which. If I was to use the 400 rpm scale it would give me values about 1 ms lower than those in the table.

NOTE:

Motec recommend a constant 3ms charge time for LS1 coils I hear, when I make the change i'll double check this.

  • 1 month later...

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

090318_1_.pdf

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

This is a dwell table from my wifes 93 z32, vg30dett.

post-536-1191612410_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
    • If you are Ecutek tuned then these TCU tunes are anywhere from $550 to $700 usd. If you are not ECUTEK tuned, then it gets costly!    
    • Sorry to hear your HFM BM57 was faulty,  did you contact HFM I would hope they would be at least grateful for the information if there was some sort of manufacturing fault, you would hope they would be sympathetic even if your item was 2 years old if it had never been fitted. May I ask where it leaked from ?
×
×
  • Create New...