Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After looking at the ignition dwell duty table values. I googled for the conversion from dec to milliseconds, and discovered a few differing methods that yeld some very different results.

firstly there are 32 (RPM) points in the table, some believe that these are in 400 rpm blocks thus going from 400-12800 rpm (seems unlikely). 200 rpm intervals seem more likely eg. 200-6400 rpm.

next the dec values I imagine have a conversion value to convert them to a percentage, two variations on this one.

1. divide by 10

2. multiply by .33

I favor the option 1, but could be wrong.

Now to convert dwell duty percentage into milliseconds.

I used this method (1/(RPM) X 6000) X Duty % (in decimal).

This gives me a peak of around 4 ms at 200 rpm and an average value of around 2 ms for the rest of the table.

Am I on the right track with this one?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180258-z32-igniton-dwell-duty/
Share on other sites

Looking at the Z32 ECU I have tried to come up with a conversion table to ms and came up with zip! I have tried longer dwell on standard coils and had better burn and more torque but prone to detonation and shorter dwell and less prone to detonation but guaranteed way to fry coils.

From what I have gathered there is 2 increments per RPM scale and they seem to differ. by best guess would be use the RPM scale as a guide and devide each increment by 2 for your 32 points.

As for dwell values there was a table somewhere I will have a look and see if i can dig it up. but the results were a bit shady. there was actually a brand of coild called FET. and they gave specifications that indicate they were designed for a min of 2ms and no less.

sorry can't be much help :)

there are numbers of GTR's in japan making 800ps with standard coils so they know something we dont...

high on painkillers right now sorry if my explination is not the best...

Here is a table of values using data at 7B60 tp 7B7F.

200 Rpm - 4.50 ms

400 Rpm - 2.25 ms

600 Rpm - 2.20 ms

800 Rpm - 2.40 ms

1000 Rpm - 2.52 ms

1200 Rpm - 2.60 ms

1400 Rpm - 2.57 ms

1600 Rpm - 2.66 ms

1800 Rpm - 2.70 ms

2000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

2200 Rpm - 2.84 ms

2400 Rpm - 2.90 ms

2600 Rpm - 2.91 ms

2800 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3000 Rpm - 3.02 ms

3200 Rpm - 3.04 ms

3400 Rpm - 3.07 ms

3600 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3800 Rpm - 2.91 ms

4000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

4200 Rpm - 2.83 ms

4400 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4600 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4800 Rpm - 2.85 ms

5000 Rpm - 2.80 ms

5200 Rpm - 2.69 ms

5400 Rpm - 2.59 ms

5600 Rpm - 2.50 ms

5800 Rpm - 2.41 ms

6000 Rpm - 2.33 ms

6200 Rpm - 2.25 ms

6400 Rpm - 2.18 ms

Seems to fit in with CEF11E info on the coils.

Maybe someone has measured dwell in ms at any of these points and can confirm if this correct.

I made it.

Took the values in the igniton dwell duty table, Converted them into dec.

Divided them by 10 (Conversion in to Dwell Duty %).

Then applied this formula ((1/RPM) x 60000) x Dwell Duty % (as decimal).

I scaled each of the addresses as 200 RPM Intervals.

eg. 32 addresses = 200 - 6400 rpm.

EXAMPLE:

Value at 7B60 is 0F or 15 dec.

15/10 = 1.5

((1/200) x 60000) x 0.015

(300) x 0.015 = 4.5 ms.

This is how I got those values in the table, still not sure if it is 100% accurate.

It would be good if someone has measured the dwell time at a few of these points to prove or disprove this method.

The other option of scaling the table in 400 rpm (400-12800 rpm) intervals is still possible, with smaller values.

Somewhere around 1 millisecond lower at a guess.

Just thought i'd add that the reason behind all this is that I plan to use LS1 coils in the future if my Ser 2 coils give out.

I'll probably increase the dwell for these as i've heard that they are a little slow and need around 3-4.5 ms of dwell.

its an iduuctive coil. around 2mh. the norm is the higher the inductance the longer the dwell needed. the longer the better. but the longer it is the more heat is generated in the coil and driver.

generally to get a very good spark around 3-4ms is nominal. 2ms would be at tyhe very bottom of the scale without having to close down the gap.

ive been playing around with differant coil for my cdi set up. and found tha a mitsubishi gto coil pack is no good. cos its got an inductance of 6mh. where as my mazda coil are only 3mh. so they need half the charging time.

you need to workout how many ms are available at full rpm.

I believe that those numbers are too high, when you put those sort of dwell numbers into an aftermarket computer the stock coils burn out, i was under the impression that the stock system runs about 1.7ms

Edited by Adriano

Okay,

TO4GTR - Maximum dwell duty % would be 25.5 %, That would mean that @ 6400 rpm max coil charge time would be 2.38 ms.

Adriano - The RPM Scale that I am using could be either 200 or 400 rpm i'm not sure which. If I was to use the 400 rpm scale it would give me values about 1 ms lower than those in the table.

NOTE:

Motec recommend a constant 3ms charge time for LS1 coils I hear, when I make the change i'll double check this.

  • 1 month later...

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

090318_1_.pdf

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

This is a dwell table from my wifes 93 z32, vg30dett.

post-536-1191612410_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...