Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive heard of a limited run (like 150 or so supposedely RARE AS!) of the r32 gtst or i think they also called it the gtsm about the same time the r32 gtr v spec 2 was released...

i think it came with the same body as the gtr (as in it had pumped guards)

now i always thought the mspec range was just cosmetic differences....

but they say this particular model came with a mspec2 2 rb20det engine... it had higher compression and a different turbo?

they say the engine is distinguishable by not having rb20 printed on the engine cover...

u know how the rb series have rb20, rb25 etc on the front of the engine, well this one is just blank...

i think it also came with bigger brakes..

can anyone confirm this???

ive searched everywhere and cant find much at all....

thanks..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180619-r32-engine-spec/
Share on other sites

When the R32 V-Spec II came out in 1994 there were no R32 GTS-t's only R33 GTS, GTS-25 and so on.

Series 2 R32 GTS-t and GTS-4 did come with a RB20DET that no longer had RB20 on the cam cover, also the coil packs were different, other then that the engine is nearly identical to Series 1.

All non GTR R32's were discontinued after 1993 when the R33 chassis replaced it.

The only M-Spec I know of is the R34 GTR named for the LeMans cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180619-r32-engine-spec/#findComment-3287125
Share on other sites

There is a series 1 and 2 in r32 gts-t.

There is also a thing called a Type-M.

So you are referring to a series 2 Type-M. The engine is pretty much exactly the same (if not identical)

The biggest difference between Type-M and non-Type-M is that they have the bigger 4 piston brakes, leather gear know, gear boot and steering wheel.

All of the "other" Type-M things (sunroof, bodykit, upgrade interior, front lip) are options available on both Type-M and non-Type-M skylines.

The biggest difference between series 1 and series 2 is that series 1 has blue dials and series 2 has grey dials.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180619-r32-engine-spec/#findComment-3294609
Share on other sites

There is a series 1 and 2 in r32 gts-t.

There is also a thing called a Type-M.

So you are referring to a series 2 Type-M. The engine is pretty much exactly the same (if not identical)

The biggest difference between Type-M and non-Type-M is that they have the bigger 4 piston brakes, leather gear know, gear boot and steering wheel.

All of the "other" Type-M things (sunroof, bodykit, upgrade interior, front lip) are options available on both Type-M and non-Type-M skylines.

The biggest difference between series 1 and series 2 is that series 1 has blue dials and series 2 has grey dials.

All Series II GTS-t's are type-M, All GTS-4's series I and II are type-M. All of them have the bigger brakes, alloy wheels.

I can't recall which ones have which, but series I and series II coils differ in the fact that the contact point is a spring on one and a solid piece on the other.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180619-r32-engine-spec/#findComment-3302296
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...