Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest INASNT

I need some help on how to read the comp flow map for this T04 60-1 Trim i might be buying.

to4-60-1.JPG

It has 0.60 A/R comp and either 0.84 or 0.63 A/R exhaust housing.

How Good will this run on a internally stock RB25DET with adj cam gears. Dont worry about injectors and fuel pump etc coz they r getting done 2.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18063-reading-comp-flow-maps/
Share on other sites

Hi INASNT, very quickly .........

At 1.1 bar of boost, it is going to be doing 96,400 shaft rpm and producing 55 lbs of air per minute. I can't tell you the efficiency as it has no calibrations on the islands, but it looks to be around 65% to 70 %, which is good. That's enough air for around 550 bhp.

It has good efficient airflow of 25 lbs per minute using 69,600 rpm at 0.5 bar. Efficiency drops off sharply over 105,500 rpm and using more than 1.5 bar of boost would be waste of time. It is going to need careful tuning and matching of the exhaust turbine and housing to stay above the surge limit.

In summary, a pretty good compressor to use with an RB25DET provided it has at least forged pistons and preferably forged rods as well.

Hope that helps

INASNT - compressor maps arent too difficult to read - airflow along the bottom and bar up the side. thing to remeber is that at sea level you already have 1 bar - so subtract 1.0 from the vertical axis and you will have boost pressure.

With turbine housing size, one theory (the one I am trying:)) is to use a smaller housing with large wastegate - this will build the boost earlier, and keep you away from the surge limit. I am using a 0.61 A/R ratio turbine housing on the 3037 I am fitting - I hope it will be done and tuned in about 2-3 weeks (the wait is killing me) so I will let you know how it goes.

That turbo should be sweet with 0.8 to 1.0 bar on stock internals (and a good tune) - after that start thinking about a head gasket to drop the compression ratio

***ducks for cover waiting for sydneykid to throw something***

Guest INASNT

More info on the turbo.

Exhaust housing has a T03 flange, although A/R .84 housing is to suit an external wastegate. The A/R .63 housing is internally gated which is also available if required.

It is a bush-bearing Garrett T03 turbo which actually has a 360 degree competition (screwed-down) thrust bearing also (forgot to mention).

But it is a design from the 70's and a twin ball bearing would be more efficient and spool up quicker wouldnt it??

damn i dont know what to do!!!

If the bearing was from the 70s, I would definately replace it with a new one before fitting it:p But seriously, bush bearings today are catching up with ball bearings. Subaru use them on the WRX.

If you are not sure - go with what you really want, not what is cheapest - remeber, the glow of a cheaper unit will wear off quickly - the added cost of a better unit will be forgotten when you are driving. I would definately go the smaller A/R ratio as it will make boost quicker, just make sure the internal gate is a good size, which it should be if its designed for use with that turbo. If you are buying it from a shop, ask if they have fitted them to anybody elses car, and if you can get in contact with them to find out how it went?

sidewaymambo - any details on joe's turbo, performance wise and what turbine AR did he use? - that map is just so nice and fat!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...