Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Just want to know, what are peoples thoughts on the advantages of a flywheel? Do you guys believe there are any power gains to be made on a dyno? From what I've read there is no dyno difference however on the street, it is like having 101lbs less weight on the street???

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180880-flywheel-advantages/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

also depends what you want the car for. Some like the lightweight one that will rev good... but it does lose some power from revving so easily as there is no momentum behind the flywheel, if you have a dogbox or a very heavy clutch might also be better to get a chromolly flywheel that is heavier for the added strengh

ALSO... if you are replacing the clutch too might be best to get a flywheel clutch combo cause different compound clutches n flywheels will make it slip or chatter. Big writeup a few issues ago in HPI

Edited by choku_dori

Yeh, i gotta replace the clutch now its slipping a fair bit. I'm looking at getting the nismo sports clutch kit, and the flywheel works out to be $350 extra. I heard the other way around, that because the flywheel is lighter, makes it easier for the power to be transmitted through the drivetrain and to the rear wheels, in the end leading to better power to weight ratios. On the dyno figures would be minimal but on the street was told acceleration changes significantly??? Is this true?

a big rock takes longer to gain speed when rolling, but harder to stop once rolling than a smaller rock.

rough example. When a car is in 1st gear engine sees maybe 200kg in 2nd 500kg 3rd900 and so on. If you can remove weight before the gearbox and diff (torque multiplers) you engine sees less weight and can accelerate faster for the same power.

So you won't gain power on a dyno but you will gain response on the road.

You will find that it will rev faster and will be great for the street / track/ and drags, butyou loose torque because it's lighter and doesn't have the momentum to keep spinning which is what you want then drifting and rallying.

I lightened mine when getting a new clutch. I believe this is how it works, tell me if I'm wrong. While you don't get any extra power, if you have 230rwkw (and let's say that's 280atf), then with a lightened flywheel, you'll still have 280atf, but you might have 234-235kw actually reaching the tyres because less energy is lost in the drivetrain. When I got mine installed, I accidentally redlined it in second the first time I planted from a dead holt to 100kph, cos I was used to changing by feel and timing, but because the engine went through the rev range quickly, she bounced lol. I like the feel of it, in fact so much that I'm interested in lightening other parts of the drivetrain to get more of the power I'm already making to the ground. Seems like a relatively cheap way to maximise use of the powr you're making and I plan to go nuts later RE power, so I will want to do it sooner or later.

no power gains as such but the less weight your engine has to turn eg flywheel and clutch assembly, gearbox, tail shaft, diff, wheels the quicker it can accelerate.

Remember gran turismo you could get a racing flywheel and carbon fibre tail shaft and you drop .3-.4 off your 1/4 mile time on a stock s13 or similar!

no power gains as such but the less weight your engine has to turn eg flywheel and clutch assembly, gearbox, tail shaft, diff, wheels the quicker it can accelerate.

Remember gran turismo you could get a racing flywheel and carbon fibre tail shaft and you drop .3-.4 off your 1/4 mile time on a stock s13 or similar!

Well if it is in gran tourismo it must be true.

In reality a kilo or so in amongst 1500kg of car is undetectable. In no way is a lightened flywheel either a significant gain (as some would have you believe) or a loss (As other argue).

The only time you will ever motice it is when the clutch is in. The reduction in inertia allows the motor to pick up and/or drop revs more quickly. You may also notice the lesser amount of inertia when you drop the clutch.

Edited by djr81
In reality a kilo or so in amongst 1500kg of car is undetectable. In no way is a lightened flywheel either a significant gain (as some would have you believe) or a loss (As other argue).

The only time you will ever motice it is when the clutch is in. The reduction in inertia allows the motor to pick up and/or drop revs more quickly. You may also notice the lesser amount of inertia when you drop the clutch.

Yes, it's more noticeable in neutral and just free revving it, but I've got a buttload of sound deadening and a big sub box, and I could PLAINLY tell the difference during normal driving. I could accelerate faster - It was night and day, hence why I redlined well before I was expecting to (after having driven the car in the same configuration for 2 years, I had a good feel for when I had to change, and I usually change about 2k BEFORE redline. That's gotta say something! And because of my sound deadening, I'm sure it's not having as big effect as it does on a car that's been lightened in other ways!

I would agree with others though, it's not worth doing unless the clutch is being opened up anyway, otherwise there are definitely cheaper ways to (initially) go faster.

Yes, it's more noticeable in neutral and just free revving it, but I've got a buttload of sound deadening and a big sub box, and I could PLAINLY tell the difference during normal driving. I could accelerate faster - It was night and day, hence why I redlined well before I was expecting to (after having driven the car in the same configuration for 2 years, I had a good feel for when I had to change, and I usually change about 2k BEFORE redline. That's gotta say something! And because of my sound deadening, I'm sure it's not having as big effect as it does on a car that's been lightened in other ways!

I would agree with others though, it's not worth doing unless the clutch is being opened up anyway, otherwise there are definitely cheaper ways to (initially) go faster.

Well, not to be rude, but I am sure you couldn't. Plainly or otherwise. The difference in hp or weight you need to be able to detect a change is quite marked & most people only think they can feel something simply because they already know it is there. In any case you get used to changes that quickly it is not funny.

The difference in rotational mass compared to static mass is substantial. Taking 2 kg off the flywheel makes far more of a difference than taking 2 kg of the car body for acceleration purposes.

Be prepared for decreaced fuel economy, not that this really maters on a performance car.

This goes for drive shafts and tyre/rims. You will definitley feel the difference with heavier rims..!!

I'd change to lighter flywheel if I had my g/box out.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
The difference in rotational mass compared to static mass is substantial. Taking 2 kg off the flywheel makes far more of a difference than taking 2 kg of the car body for acceleration purposes.

Be prepared for decreaced fuel economy, not that this really maters on a performance car.

This goes for drive shafts and tyre/rims. You will definitley feel the difference with heavier rims..!!

I'd change to lighter flywheel if I had my g/box out.

Cheers,

Well I can't be arsed doing the calculation, but please feel free to do it for the rest of us. In a linear state kinetic energy is equal to half the mass times the square of the velocity.

In a rotational circumstance the equation is similar, but obviously uses the polar moment of inertia instead of the mass & the velocity is measured in radians per second rather than meters per second.

Whilst removing the weight from the flywheel is more effective than just removing sound deadener or whatever it is still not significant. You will find it is << 1% of the total energy which is basically undetectable unless you are either psychic or have a shed load of data logging & alot of time on your hands.

Edited by djr81
Well I can't be arsed doing the calculation, but please feel free to do it for the rest of us. In a linear state kinetic energy is equal to half the mass times the square of the velocity.

In a rotational circumstance the equation is similar, but obviously uses the polar moment of inertia instead of the mass & the velocity is measured in radians per second rather than meters per second.

Whilst removing the weight from the flywheel is more effective than just removing sound deadener or whatever it is still not significant. You will find it is << 1% of the total energy which is basically undetectable unless you are either psychic or have a shed load of data logging & alot of time on your hands.

Mate, comparing the effectiveness of a lightened flywheel is far more complicated than the equations you have pointed out. There are many factors such as gear/diff ratio which amplify the load reduction on the engine during acceleration. Highest improvements in acceleration is in the lower gears and less effective within the higher ones. Depending on the engine, g/box, diff etc, you can reduce the effective weight of your car significantly (in first-second gear). Without going into the details which requires some serious calcs, let me assure you that you will definitely notice the difference of a lightweight flywheel. :P

Mind you it does have draw-backs.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...