Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, i'm having a bit of a dilemma with my car ATM.

My current modifications to my R32 GTS4 (RB20) are:

-HKS GT2530

-gt-r injectors with resistor pack

-FMIC

-Apexi SAFCII

-Electronic Boost controller

-BOSCH Fuel pump

-HKS Exhaust etc.

At the moment my engine management is controlled by some ancient Apexi piggyback type system specifically tuned for my modifications along with an SAFCII I purchased a few months ago to tune and make the car run a bit better than it was.

I was informed by my tuner that i might not be able to just run my SAFCII with my standard ECU because there might be some affects with my piggyback system once out, as it might be controlling more than they thought.

Now i was thinking that i could use my SAFCII with my standard ECU and GT-R injectors as long as as you have a resistor pack (which i do) - I always thought you could run your GT-R injectors with a resistor pack on your standard ECU.

Can my goal of a reliable 200kw be achieved with an SAFCII with these mods over my standard ECU?

Thanks in advance.

Edited by GTS4-32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181527-safcii-with-rb20/
Share on other sites

I know this is an easier way out, but how about getting a GTR Powerfc and running that? You can get rid of the resistor pack, as the Powerfc will work perfectly. Just need a loom adapter ($130) and switch a few wries around (I've done it and can provide a wiring diagram)

Sell all of your other gear, and you should make up half of the costs.

I'm looking into getting the D Jetro RB26 powerfc to work with the RB20 and RB25, then you could throw away your AFM too.

I know this is an easier way out, but how about getting a GTR Powerfc and running that? You can get rid of the resistor pack, as the Powerfc will work perfectly. Just need a loom adapter ($130) and switch a few wries around (I've done it and can provide a wiring diagram)

Sell all of your other gear, and you should make up half of the costs.

I'm looking into getting the D Jetro RB26 powerfc to work with the RB20 and RB25, then you could throw away your AFM too.

I read about the GTR PFC running on RB20/25 but didn't stay up to date with the thread.

Where are the looms available from?

Sorry to go off topic :laugh:

Thanks,

Abu

With the above modifications you can make 200rwkw, even on standard injectors.

Your issue now is working out if you can remove the piggy back ECU, and use the SAFC II.

As far as I am aware you cannot run after market injectors on a SAFC II, as it cant be calibrated, thats what I have always been told and have always read, but that could be different for GTR injectors with the resistor pack.

But as far as I am aware the resistor pack for the GTR injectors only changes the injectors from high impedance to low impedance, or vise versa? Don't quote me on that, thats just what I remember off the top of my head.

But if that is the case, that means they wont run on standard ECU as the injectors have a higher flow rating to standard RB20 ones, so it will be hard, if not impossible to tune it with an SAFC?

BUT if you can run the standard injectors on the STD ECU, then there is no problem tuning the GTR injectors through an SAFC II.

I'm just trying to work this out in my head, and I am not sure on the specific details, but I am just addressing some of the points you need to consider, and maybe someone who knows specifically, can clarify for you.

What I think you should do is scrap the piggy back computer that is in there, and put it standard RB20 injectors, if you don't have them in there already and get the SAFC II installed and tuned.

With the right boost/tune you will get to 200rwkw on STD injectors, but probably not recommended that you go any higher then that as they will close to maxing out.. The harder you push them the more prone they will be to give in.

Hope some of that brain storming helps. Good luck! :laugh:

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

Hey Abu, thanks for your input.

Although, when I thought about it, and what i've sort of gathered reading around the forum is that the only reason you would use resistor packs for the gt-r injectors was for the ECU to think that they're the standard high-impedency injector, that way not needing to scrap the std ECU, and how using an PowerFC won't need you to retain the resistor pack (hope i'm making sense and havn't been misguided).

If my assumptions are correct, then i wouldn't think it would be a problem using as SAFCII on top to work with.

Thanks,

Steve.

Yea that was the plan before i purchased the safcII, the only reason i didnt stick with it is because i spoke to a couple tuners and they told me its a big risk, because they could get your car running great, with good results and running well or they can completely screw up the whole setup where you wouldn't be able to get your car running out of there, they said its a risk people take. Thats the only reason i sort of backed off. Is what people telling true or you haven't heard of this before?

Unless they (Dr. Drift, CEF11E) can give me re-assurance that my car will be fine and they'll get it running better than before without these extra junk, then i may consider it.

Yea that was the plan before i purchased the safcII, the only reason i didnt stick with it is because i spoke to a couple tuners and they told me its a big risk, because they could get your car running great, with good results and running well or they can completely screw up the whole setup where you wouldn't be able to get your car running out of there, they said its a risk people take. Thats the only reason i sort of backed off. Is what people telling true or you haven't heard of this before?

Unless they (Dr. Drift, CEF11E) can give me re-assurance that my car will be fine and they'll get it running better than before without these extra junk, then i may consider it.

Dr Drift does a fairly good job and has for a lot of people on here and on NS.com

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=181157

^Bit of feedback from members.

It just depends how much you want to spend, I mean if you want to push it to 200rwkw why use a REMAP when a SAFC would do the same thing or you.

SAFC cost about $250, thats what I paid for an almost brand new one, then installation - yourself, and tune $150, as appose to $600 - $1000 for a remap, and you will make similar if not the same power.

There is nothing wrong with the REMAP, if anythere its better than a SAFC fuel only computer.

I am still thinking you cant run GTR injectors with the SAFC, I suggest you get that clarified by someone, but the REMAP can support anything, Z32, after market injectors etc..

Another upside is SAFCII can be switched off to run standard fuel map, so if you dont want to run say 20psi, put it back to 10 and switch the SAFCII to standard fuel map.

At any stage if you want to put the car back to stock, say standard fuel pump, turbo, stock cooler, you can always just take the SAFC II out and run the standard ECU tune as its only a piggy back computer.

SAFC II can also support 2x fuel maps, so high boost/low boost, or an economy map and a high boost map etc..

REMAP, your stuck with the tune on there, if you want to get it changed, take it back to the tuner. thats the down side.

If you put the car back to stock, you will need to get the REMAP taken out, and I am not sure if thats possible.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=251404

Heaps of information about running GTR injectors on a RB20.

I havent had time to read through it yet, but I will have a read of it once I get back from my lunch break.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

Abu; dude, you need to think about what you want to type before you type. You just seem to go around in circles.

gts4-32; A real time re map of your stock ecu will give excellent results. I suspect the tuners you have talked to thought you were talking about a generic chip swap, which are generally a best guess based on the information you give, as opposed to a proper real time tune.

And just clarifying what some of the other guys have posted, you definately need to keep the resistor pack. Your safc can run bigger injectors, though it is not ideal. Thats why it needs switchable maps for high and low boost settings, particularly if your stock afm runs out of resolution.

You really need to get rid of one of the piggy backs. Can you post pics of the old apexi unit so we can figure out what it is?

Abu - I already have a safcII and got it tuned with no difference to what i began with. Except its not controlling the fuel, the other piggyback is. Thats why i was asking if the safcII can run gtr injectors so i can rip the other junk out. But then the tuners told me it may be controlling more than they thought, because they seen more wires going in all directions, they told me it was best to keep it in there just in case. But i really dont want it in there. I wanna have 1 computer controlling air and fuel.

Btw how do you switch the maps for high-low boost settings on the safcII?

BHDave - This is what the other computer looks like:

post-10027-1187585911_thumb.jpg post-10027-1187585930_thumb.jpg post-10027-1187585949_thumb.jpg

Sorry about the poor photos, my phones all i got on me atm. But this is what they read;

-F-MANAGE - AID (AUTO INJECTOR DRIVER)

-F-MANAGE - Q/N DC Engine Management

Some old apexi computer that nobodies seen before.

What do you think?

i think you should pull it all out n sell it along with the safc to fund a remap :( , piggy back chips like them are like putting a bandaid over a gaping wound, sure it will soak up the blood and hold it together for a minute, but its not fixing the problem :)

I had a quick search and yeah, there's bugger all info out there.

I found an old post on performance forums where the guy reckoned xspeed could tune them. That doesn't really help but atleast gives you a lead to find out what they are. From the look of it they are the ancestors of the safc and sitc. Are there any trim pots on there that can be adjusted with a little screwdriver or anything like that? can you open them?

Anyway, http://www.xspeed.com.au/index.php if you want to follow that up

If it's running badly and you want to sort it out properly then it's worth talking to dr drift about a remap and removal of the piggy backs i think.

Abu - I already have a safcII and got it tuned with no difference to what i began with. Except its not controlling the fuel, the other piggyback is. Thats why i was asking if the safcII can run gtr injectors so i can rip the other junk out. But then the tuners told me it may be controlling more than they thought, because they seen more wires going in all directions, they told me it was best to keep it in there just in case. But i really dont want it in there. I wanna have 1 computer controlling air and fuel.

Btw how do you switch the maps for high-low boost settings on the safcII?

BHDave - This is what the other computer looks like:

post-10027-1187585911_thumb.jpg post-10027-1187585930_thumb.jpg post-10027-1187585949_thumb.jpg

Sorry about the poor photos, my phones all i got on me atm. But this is what they read;

-F-MANAGE - AID (AUTO INJECTOR DRIVER)

-F-MANAGE - Q/N DC Engine Management

Some old apexi computer that nobodies seen before.

What do you think?

Okay maybe I am slightly confused..

But APEXi SAFC II is a FUEL only computer so what did they tune, and what exactly is it controlling if its not controling the fuel!?

Its displayed as like TYPE A & B, that is the 2 maps that the SAFC II has to interchange between..

Get that other thing ripped out and get the SAFC II tuned to run the fuel side of things.. thats what needs to be done in simple terms.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

i dont think they tuned anything, they wouldve just installed it. Im gonna have to get another tuner to have a look and see what they can do with it.

Thanks for your inputs guys, its been much appreciated.

Cheers,

Steve.

the safc only changes the afm signal voltage so the ecu is tricked into think it is getting less/more air flow. so if you tune the safc to trick the ecu that its getting more airflow then it really is it will compensate and inject more fuel. thats how you can tune the a/f maps with it.

i cant see any reason why the gtr injectors cant be used. you need the resistor pack so they will work with the high impedance signal from the standard ecu and the safc to tune the amount of fuel going in. bigger injectors = more fuel. you would then need the safc to reduce the amount of fuel being injected so that you aren't running rich on say light throttle. and visa versa on full throttle, more fuel may be needed.

^ yeah you can do that, but it's a fart.

Any changes you make to the a/f signal effects the timing output from the ecu. Generally, if you drop the voltage at high revs to lean an enigine out, it increases timing, which can cause detonation.

I haven't heard of any issues with remapping the stock ecu. Find a good tuner....

Unless they (Dr. Drift, CEF11E) can give me re-assurance that my car will be fine and they'll get it running better than before without these extra junk, then i may consider it.

Consider it DONE!

Reassured?

0425818755 if you would like to talk about it, or to book it in.

Sam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...