Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey mates, my car has just been totalled. some girl pulled out in front of me and my car went crunch. Motor is fine, radiator was like a cushion, only really hit p/s pump. motor cradle is a little bent on left.

anyway I was wondering whats involved in a typical rebuild. All new gaskets, piston rings, hone? Motor has close to 130k I'm sure.

Looking to stick with stock turbo, up the boost to 12, cooler, intake, etc.

thanks fellas :)

Edited by sky_2.0T
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/
Share on other sites

Hot tank block

Hone

Deck

Linished/balance Crank

Pistons & rings

Bearings

Head bolts/studs

Balance/crack test rods

Rod bearings

Head gasket

Rear main & main seal

Water pump

Machine head

Timing belt

Maybe new rod bolts

Oil pump depending on how yours is, but you would probably want one as its a new motor.

Then assembly and you would probably want the whole thing balanced as well.

Full gasket kit would be the easiet way.

Add all that up and you got your self a rebuild, but there is probably a few things I have missed..

Probably best/cheaper to just buy a 2nd hand RB25 motor, unless you really really really want to keep the RB20.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3299780
Share on other sites

from what I've read, there is noting wrong with your motor except radiator and power steering pump?

so are you buying a rolling shell to put your stock motor in to?

Why not buy a new R32 gtst and strip your old smashed one for parts like motor, interior etc..

People are always looking for R32 bits as they're all falling apart.

sell off everything from the old car and just use that money to modify the new car with 12psi, cooler and intake.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3299900
Share on other sites

Looks tough as!

Thanks,

Abu

Thanks for the input, especially abu. I think I'll compression test it, and if numbers look good just keep it the way it is. Exhaust was just smelly! Too rich on low rpms, should these motors need a tune with JUST intake and exhaust? I'll post up a dyno sheet soon... thanks all :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302226
Share on other sites

any turbo nissan motor will benifit from a tune even if it just has intake and exhaust...they run so damn rich from factory.

we tuned my friends car for 550cc injectors and 14psi on the stock turbo, goes like hell compared to a std 20 at 14...in the end removed a ton of fuel.

Edited by carl h
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302293
Share on other sites

any turbo nissan motor will benifit from a tune even if it just has intake and exhaust...they run so damn rich from factory.

we tuned my friends car for 550cc injectors and 14psi on the stock turbo, goes like hell compared to a std 20 at 14...in the end removed a ton of fuel.

would it benefit the motor to run rich at any level of rpm?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302301
Share on other sites

would it benefit the motor to run rich at any level of rpm?

Its best to get it tuned so it only uses what it needs. When you say rich, it usually means its using in excess of fuel that it should be, therefore its a waste.

That being said, rich is better than lean any day! You would rather it be running rich with a little extra fuel, then running lean and do some damage.

The best posssible thing you could do is get it tuned, that will give you the most gains/improvement in performance and also fuel economy.

Bit of extra information in regards to tuning, for your own use:

For R32 ECU you can get a REMAP, which they re-tune the standard ECU, or just got a full stand-alone ECU (Apexi PFC, WOLF, Microtech, Autronia etc..).

Most use a REMAP, and some use a SAFC II, there both fairly cost effective.

Personally, I will be using an SAFC II, which is a piggy back fuel only computer. That will serve my purpose, and has the compacity to run 2x fuel maps.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302385
Share on other sites

Its best to get it tuned so it only uses what it needs. When you say rich, it usually means its using in excess of fuel that it should be, therefore its a waste.

That being said, rich is better than lean any day! You would rather it be running rich with a little extra fuel, then running lean and do some damage.

The best posssible thing you could do is get it tuned, that will give you the most gains/improvement in performance and also fuel economy.

Bit of extra information in regards to tuning, for your own use:

For R32 ECU you can get a REMAP, which they re-tune the standard ECU, or just got a full stand-alone ECU (Apexi PFC, WOLF, Microtech, Autronia etc..).

Most use a REMAP, and some use a SAFC II, there both fairly cost effective.

Personally, I will be using an SAFC II, which is a piggy back fuel only computer. That will serve my purpose, and has the compacity to run 2x fuel maps.

Thanks,

Abu

so with SAFC-II you could have a low boost and high boost setting eh?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302705
Share on other sites

so with SAFC-II you could have a low boost and high boost setting eh?

Yep, sure can.

Doesn't controll boost obviously, just the fuel side of things. :action-smiley-069:

But yes, 2x fuel map, high boost & low boost.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302712
Share on other sites

safc II is not a boost controller.

it can't set boost.

it is a piggy back air:Fuel adjuster.

it basically "modifies" the signal the AFM sends to the ECU to adjust the amount of Fuel the ecu puts in to the mixture.

the ability to have 2 maps to me seems like a waste of time..

why would you want 2?

a good one and a bad one?

a good one and a better one?

why wouldn't you just have the best tune you can and leave it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302717
Share on other sites

safc II is not a boost controller.

it can't set boost.

it is a piggy back air:Fuel adjuster.

it basically "modifies" the signal the AFM sends to the ECU to adjust the amount of Fuel the ecu puts in to the mixture.

the ability to have 2 maps to me seems like a waste of time..

why would you want 2?

a good one and a bad one?

a good one and a better one?

why wouldn't you just have the best tune you can and leave it?

A waste of time?

Maybe you want to have a high boost, 18psi fuel map, and a low boost, 10psi fuel map, or even a high boost 18psi fuel map, and a stock boost economy fuel map for long trips?

You would want your 18psi tune to be reasonably rich so that it is safe, but if your just daily driving it to work and back, you would probably want it to be slightly more economical, so you'd put the boost down, and drive it normal. So it would make sense to have a more lean map, for better fuel economy..

Makes sense to me, and is definately useful in the above context.

Its not like its hard to change between two maps, its just a click of a few buttons.

I think what he was asking is, can you have a high boost fuel map and a low boost fuel map, he just didnt word it in such a way.

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302723
Share on other sites

hmmm..

someone clarify this then.

Are the SAFC settings static?

I mean, if you tune a car with 18psi boost.

it will have say 300CFM of air at 5000rpm and the ECU will add X amount of fuel to it. you can tune the amount of AIR flow the ecu sees via the safc so the ecu adjust the amount of fuel it dumps at that particular RPM.

if you then lower the boost to 10psi, give it a hit, at 5000rpm, it will be sucking in say 200CFM of air.

the setting you made at 5000rpm before via the SAFC (lets say you made it so it removed fuel by 3 points to get the A:F ratio at 5000rpm to 12.0:1), does it still remove the 3 points of fuel?

All this may be confusing...

18psi boost @ 5000rpm = 300CFM of air

10psi boost @ 5000rpm = 200CFM of air

you make a setting on the SAFC at 5000rpm point to make the ECU remove 3 points of fuel when tuning the 18psi run.

what happens at 5000rpm when you run 10 psi?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302747
Share on other sites

hmmm..

someone clarify this then.

Are the SAFC settings static?

I mean, if you tune a car with 18psi boost.

it will have say 300CFM of air at 5000rpm and the ECU will add X amount of fuel to it. you can tune the amount of AIR flow the ecu sees via the safc so the ecu adjust the amount of fuel it dumps at that particular RPM.

if you then lower the boost to 10psi, give it a hit, at 5000rpm, it will be sucking in say 200CFM of air.

the setting you made at 5000rpm before via the SAFC (lets say you made it so it removed fuel by 3 points to get the A:F ratio at 5000rpm to 12.0:1), does it still remove the 3 points of fuel?

All this may be confusing...

18psi boost @ 5000rpm = 300CFM of air

10psi boost @ 5000rpm = 200CFM of air

you make a setting on the SAFC at 5000rpm point to make the ECU remove 3 points of fuel when tuning the 18psi run.

what happens at 5000rpm when you run 10 psi?

Hmm.. little bit confusing and a bit over my head I think. :action-smiley-069:

I will let someone else comment.

Basically its 2 seperate fuel maps though, so fuel map 1 may have extra fuel added through out the REV range, where as fuel map 2 maybe remove fuel through out the REV range.

Dont know if that is relavent, but thats basically how it works.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302761
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
×
×
  • Create New...