Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey mates, my car has just been totalled. some girl pulled out in front of me and my car went crunch. Motor is fine, radiator was like a cushion, only really hit p/s pump. motor cradle is a little bent on left.

anyway I was wondering whats involved in a typical rebuild. All new gaskets, piston rings, hone? Motor has close to 130k I'm sure.

Looking to stick with stock turbo, up the boost to 12, cooler, intake, etc.

thanks fellas :)

Edited by sky_2.0T
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/
Share on other sites

Hot tank block

Hone

Deck

Linished/balance Crank

Pistons & rings

Bearings

Head bolts/studs

Balance/crack test rods

Rod bearings

Head gasket

Rear main & main seal

Water pump

Machine head

Timing belt

Maybe new rod bolts

Oil pump depending on how yours is, but you would probably want one as its a new motor.

Then assembly and you would probably want the whole thing balanced as well.

Full gasket kit would be the easiet way.

Add all that up and you got your self a rebuild, but there is probably a few things I have missed..

Probably best/cheaper to just buy a 2nd hand RB25 motor, unless you really really really want to keep the RB20.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3299780
Share on other sites

from what I've read, there is noting wrong with your motor except radiator and power steering pump?

so are you buying a rolling shell to put your stock motor in to?

Why not buy a new R32 gtst and strip your old smashed one for parts like motor, interior etc..

People are always looking for R32 bits as they're all falling apart.

sell off everything from the old car and just use that money to modify the new car with 12psi, cooler and intake.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3299900
Share on other sites

Looks tough as!

Thanks,

Abu

Thanks for the input, especially abu. I think I'll compression test it, and if numbers look good just keep it the way it is. Exhaust was just smelly! Too rich on low rpms, should these motors need a tune with JUST intake and exhaust? I'll post up a dyno sheet soon... thanks all :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302226
Share on other sites

any turbo nissan motor will benifit from a tune even if it just has intake and exhaust...they run so damn rich from factory.

we tuned my friends car for 550cc injectors and 14psi on the stock turbo, goes like hell compared to a std 20 at 14...in the end removed a ton of fuel.

Edited by carl h
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302293
Share on other sites

any turbo nissan motor will benifit from a tune even if it just has intake and exhaust...they run so damn rich from factory.

we tuned my friends car for 550cc injectors and 14psi on the stock turbo, goes like hell compared to a std 20 at 14...in the end removed a ton of fuel.

would it benefit the motor to run rich at any level of rpm?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302301
Share on other sites

would it benefit the motor to run rich at any level of rpm?

Its best to get it tuned so it only uses what it needs. When you say rich, it usually means its using in excess of fuel that it should be, therefore its a waste.

That being said, rich is better than lean any day! You would rather it be running rich with a little extra fuel, then running lean and do some damage.

The best posssible thing you could do is get it tuned, that will give you the most gains/improvement in performance and also fuel economy.

Bit of extra information in regards to tuning, for your own use:

For R32 ECU you can get a REMAP, which they re-tune the standard ECU, or just got a full stand-alone ECU (Apexi PFC, WOLF, Microtech, Autronia etc..).

Most use a REMAP, and some use a SAFC II, there both fairly cost effective.

Personally, I will be using an SAFC II, which is a piggy back fuel only computer. That will serve my purpose, and has the compacity to run 2x fuel maps.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302385
Share on other sites

Its best to get it tuned so it only uses what it needs. When you say rich, it usually means its using in excess of fuel that it should be, therefore its a waste.

That being said, rich is better than lean any day! You would rather it be running rich with a little extra fuel, then running lean and do some damage.

The best posssible thing you could do is get it tuned, that will give you the most gains/improvement in performance and also fuel economy.

Bit of extra information in regards to tuning, for your own use:

For R32 ECU you can get a REMAP, which they re-tune the standard ECU, or just got a full stand-alone ECU (Apexi PFC, WOLF, Microtech, Autronia etc..).

Most use a REMAP, and some use a SAFC II, there both fairly cost effective.

Personally, I will be using an SAFC II, which is a piggy back fuel only computer. That will serve my purpose, and has the compacity to run 2x fuel maps.

Thanks,

Abu

so with SAFC-II you could have a low boost and high boost setting eh?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302705
Share on other sites

so with SAFC-II you could have a low boost and high boost setting eh?

Yep, sure can.

Doesn't controll boost obviously, just the fuel side of things. :action-smiley-069:

But yes, 2x fuel map, high boost & low boost.

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302712
Share on other sites

safc II is not a boost controller.

it can't set boost.

it is a piggy back air:Fuel adjuster.

it basically "modifies" the signal the AFM sends to the ECU to adjust the amount of Fuel the ecu puts in to the mixture.

the ability to have 2 maps to me seems like a waste of time..

why would you want 2?

a good one and a bad one?

a good one and a better one?

why wouldn't you just have the best tune you can and leave it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302717
Share on other sites

safc II is not a boost controller.

it can't set boost.

it is a piggy back air:Fuel adjuster.

it basically "modifies" the signal the AFM sends to the ECU to adjust the amount of Fuel the ecu puts in to the mixture.

the ability to have 2 maps to me seems like a waste of time..

why would you want 2?

a good one and a bad one?

a good one and a better one?

why wouldn't you just have the best tune you can and leave it?

A waste of time?

Maybe you want to have a high boost, 18psi fuel map, and a low boost, 10psi fuel map, or even a high boost 18psi fuel map, and a stock boost economy fuel map for long trips?

You would want your 18psi tune to be reasonably rich so that it is safe, but if your just daily driving it to work and back, you would probably want it to be slightly more economical, so you'd put the boost down, and drive it normal. So it would make sense to have a more lean map, for better fuel economy..

Makes sense to me, and is definately useful in the above context.

Its not like its hard to change between two maps, its just a click of a few buttons.

I think what he was asking is, can you have a high boost fuel map and a low boost fuel map, he just didnt word it in such a way.

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302723
Share on other sites

hmmm..

someone clarify this then.

Are the SAFC settings static?

I mean, if you tune a car with 18psi boost.

it will have say 300CFM of air at 5000rpm and the ECU will add X amount of fuel to it. you can tune the amount of AIR flow the ecu sees via the safc so the ecu adjust the amount of fuel it dumps at that particular RPM.

if you then lower the boost to 10psi, give it a hit, at 5000rpm, it will be sucking in say 200CFM of air.

the setting you made at 5000rpm before via the SAFC (lets say you made it so it removed fuel by 3 points to get the A:F ratio at 5000rpm to 12.0:1), does it still remove the 3 points of fuel?

All this may be confusing...

18psi boost @ 5000rpm = 300CFM of air

10psi boost @ 5000rpm = 200CFM of air

you make a setting on the SAFC at 5000rpm point to make the ECU remove 3 points of fuel when tuning the 18psi run.

what happens at 5000rpm when you run 10 psi?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302747
Share on other sites

hmmm..

someone clarify this then.

Are the SAFC settings static?

I mean, if you tune a car with 18psi boost.

it will have say 300CFM of air at 5000rpm and the ECU will add X amount of fuel to it. you can tune the amount of AIR flow the ecu sees via the safc so the ecu adjust the amount of fuel it dumps at that particular RPM.

if you then lower the boost to 10psi, give it a hit, at 5000rpm, it will be sucking in say 200CFM of air.

the setting you made at 5000rpm before via the SAFC (lets say you made it so it removed fuel by 3 points to get the A:F ratio at 5000rpm to 12.0:1), does it still remove the 3 points of fuel?

All this may be confusing...

18psi boost @ 5000rpm = 300CFM of air

10psi boost @ 5000rpm = 200CFM of air

you make a setting on the SAFC at 5000rpm point to make the ECU remove 3 points of fuel when tuning the 18psi run.

what happens at 5000rpm when you run 10 psi?

Hmm.. little bit confusing and a bit over my head I think. :action-smiley-069:

I will let someone else comment.

Basically its 2 seperate fuel maps though, so fuel map 1 may have extra fuel added through out the REV range, where as fuel map 2 maybe remove fuel through out the REV range.

Dont know if that is relavent, but thats basically how it works.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181700-rb20det-rebuild/#findComment-3302761
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...